Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Comparsion of R2 and RMSE values between XGBoost-MIC conbined model and single model_
| Method | R2 | RMSE |
|---|---|---|
| composite pattern | 0.759 | 8.705 |
| XGBoost model | 0.723 | 9.453 |
| MIC model | 0.689 | 8.994 |




| Method | R2 | RMSE |
|---|---|---|
| composite pattern | 0.759 | 8.705 |
| XGBoost model | 0.723 | 9.453 |
| MIC model | 0.689 | 8.994 |
© 2023 Gao Xiang, Yu Jun, Hu Zhiyi, Hu Yuzhe, published by Xi’an Technological University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.