Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The contingent effect of work roles on brokerage in professional organizations Cover

The contingent effect of work roles on brokerage in professional organizations

By: Anssi Smedlund and  Emily W. Choi  
Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. Adler, P. and Kwon, S.-W. 2000. “Social capital: the good, the bad, and the ugly”, In Lesser, E. (Ed.), Knowledge and Social Capital. Foundations and Applications. Butterworth-Heineman, Boston, MA, pp. 89–119.
  2. Adler, P. S. and Kwon, S.-W. W. 2002. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27: 17–40.
  3. Ahuja, M. K., Galletta, D. F. and Carley, K. M. 2003. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: an empirical study. Management Science 49: 21–38.
  4. Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in Context, vol. xviii Boulder, CO, 317 pp.
  5. Antonakis, J. and Dietz, J. 2011. Looking for validity or testing it? The perils of stepwise regression, extreme-scores analysis, heteroscedasticity, and measurement error. Personality and Individual Differences 50: 409–415.
  6. Aral, S. and Van Alstyne, M. 2011. The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. American Journal of Sociology 117: 90–171.
  7. Bachrach, D. G., Powell, B. C., Collins, B. J. and Richey, R. G. 2006. Effects of task interdependence on the relationship between helping behavior and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 91: 1396–1405.
  8. Barnes, M., Kalberg, K., Pan, M. and Leung, P. 2016. When is brokerage negatively associated with economic benefits? Ethnic diversity, competition, and common-pool resources. Social Networks 45: 55–65.
  9. Biancani, S., McFarland, D. A. and Dahlander, L. 2014. The Semiformal Organization. Organization Science 25: 1306–1324.
  10. Biddle, B. 1986. Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology 12: 67–92.
  11. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. and Johnson, J. C. 2018. Analyzing Social Networks, Sage, London.
  12. Brass, D. J. 1981. Structural relationships, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 331–348.
  13. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, vol. 58, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, available at: http://books.google.com/books?id=E6v0cVy8hVIC
  14. Burt, R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 339–365.
  15. Burt, R. S. 1998. The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society 10: 5–46.
  16. Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110: 349–399.
  17. Burt, R. S. and Merluzzi, J. 2014. Embedded brokerage: hubs versus locals. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 40: 161–177.
  18. Carboni, I. and Ehrlich, K. 2013. The effect of relational and team characteristics on individual performance: a social network perspective. Human Resource Management 52: 511–535.
  19. Carnabuci, G. and Oszegi, D. I. 2015. Social networks, cognitive style, and innovative performance: a contingency perspective. Academy of Management Journal 58: 881–905.
  20. Cross, R. and Cummings, J. N. 2004. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal 47: 928–937.
  21. Cummings, T. G. 1978. Self-regulating work groups: a socio-technical synthesis. Academy of Management Review 3: 625–634.
  22. Dawson, J. F. 2014. Moderation in management research: what, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology 29: 1–19.
  23. Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J. 1994. Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology 99: 1411–1454.
  24. Etzioni, A. 1964. Modern Organizations Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  25. Fang, R., Landis, B., Zhang, Z., Anderson, M. H., Shaw, J. D. and Kilduff, M. 2015. Outcomes in organizations integrating personality and social networks: a meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science 26: 1243–1260.
  26. Fleming, L., Mingo, S. and Chen, D. 2007. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly 52: 443–475.
  27. Freeman, L. C. 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40: 35–40.
  28. Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.
  29. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A. and Parker, S. K. 2007. A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal 50: 327–347.
  30. Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 82–111.
  31. Hansen, M. T. and Haas, M. R. 2001. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 1–28.
  32. Ibarra, H. and Andrews, S. B. 1993. Power, social influence, and sense making: effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 277–303.
  33. Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L. 1978. The Social Psychology of Organizations 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, NY.
  34. Kleinbaum, A. M., Stuart, T. E. and Tushman, M. L. 2013. Discretion within constraint: homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organization Science 24: 1316–1357.
  35. Krackhardt, D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 342–369.
  36. Krackhardt, D. J. 1994. “Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations”, In Carley, K. M. and Prietula, M. J. (Eds), Computational Organization Theory, L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. xvii, 318 pp.
  37. Landis, B. 2016. Personality and social networks in organizations: a review and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior 37: S107–S121.
  38. Langfred, C. W. 2000. Work-group design and autonomy: a field study of the interaction between task interdependence and group autonomy. Small Group Research 31: 54–70.
  39. Langfred, C. W. 2005. Autonomy and performance in teams: the multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. Journal of Management 31: 513–529.
  40. Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W. L. and Sels, L. 2015. Authentic leadership, authentic followership, basic need satisfaction, and work role performance: a cross-level study. Journal of Management 41: 1677–1697.
  41. Lincoln, J. R. 1990. Social structures: a network approach. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 748–752.
  42. Lincoln, J. R. and Miller, J. 1979. Work and friendship ties in organizations: a comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 181–199.
  43. March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2: 71–87.
  44. Marsden, P. (2011), “Survey methods for network data”, In Scott, J. and Carrington, P. J. (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, Sage Publications, London, pp. 370–388.
  45. Mayhew, B. H. 1980. Structuralism Versus Individualism: part 1, Shadowboxing in the Dark. Social Forces 59: 335–375.
  46. McEvily, B., Soda, G. and Tortoriello, M. 2014. More formally: rediscovering the missing link between formal organization and informal social structure. The Academy of Management Annals 8: 299–345.
  47. Mehra, A., Kilduff, M. and Brass, D. J. 2001. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 121–146.
  48. Merton, R. 1939. Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces 18: 560–568.
  49. Obstfeld, D. 2005. Social Networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 50: 100–130.
  50. Padgett, J. F. and Ansell, C. K. 1993. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1259–1319.
  51. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. 1975. Determinants of supervisory behavior: a role set analysis. Human Relations 28: 139–154.
  52. Reagans, R. and McEvily, B. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 240–267.
  53. Reagans, R. and McEvily, B. 2008. Contradictory or compatible? Reconsidering the “Trade-Off” between brokerage and closure on knowledge sharing. Network Strategy 25: 275–313.
  54. Reagans, R. and Zuckerman, E. W. 2001. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science 12: 502–517.
  55. Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C. and Van Dyne, L. 1993. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 78: 61–72.
  56. Scott, J. 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook 2nd ed, Sage Publications, London.
  57. Soda, G. and Zaheer, A. 2012. A network perspective on organizational architecture: performance effects of the interplay of formal and informal organization. Strategic Management Journal 33: 751–771.
  58. Soda, G., Stea, D. and Pedersen, T. 2019. Network structure, collaborative context, and individual creativity. Journal of Management 45: 1739–1765.
  59. Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J. and Kraimer, M. L. 2001. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal 44: 316–325.
  60. Srivastava, S. B. 2015. Intraorganizational network dynamics in times of ambiguity. Organization Science 26: 1365–1380.
  61. Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D. and Nyberg, A. J. 2009. Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology 94: 814–828.
  62. Teigland, R. and Wasko, M. 2009. Knowledge transfer in MNCs: examining how intrinsic motivations and knowledge sourcing impact individual centrality and performance. Journal of International Management 15: 15–31.
  63. Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in Action McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  64. Tuominen, T. 2013. Innovation and development activities in professional service firms – a role structure perspective, Aalto University publication series DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS.
  65. Wang, J., Cheng, G. H., Chen, T. and Leung, K. 2019. Team creativity/innovation in culturally diverse teams: a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior 40: 693–708.
  66. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. New York, NY.
  67. Weber, M. 1982. “Bureaucracy”, in Grusky, O. and Miller, G. (Eds), Complex Organizations, Free Press, New York, NY, pp. 7–36.
  68. Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E. and Erez, A. 1998. The role-based performance scale: validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal 41: 540–555.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2019.012 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 59
Published on: Apr 27, 2020
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Anssi Smedlund, Emily W. Choi, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.