Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Who Dunnit: The Party Mystery Game for Analyzing Network Structure and Information Flow Cover

Who Dunnit: The Party Mystery Game for Analyzing Network Structure and Information Flow

Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. Bonacich, P. 2007. Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks 29(4): 555–64.
  2. Borgatti, S. P. 2005. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 27(1): 55–71.
  3. Borgatti, S. P. and Halgin, D. S. 2011. On network theory. Organization Science 22(5): 1168–81.
  4. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. and Freeman, L. C. 2002. UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
  5. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J. and Labianca, G. 2009. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916): 892–95.
  6. Brashears, M. E. and Gladstone, E. 2016. Error correction mechanisms in social networks can reduce accuracy and encourage innovation. Social Networks 44: 22–35.
  7. Burt, R. S. 2000. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior 22: 345–423.
  8. Csardi, G. and Nepusz, T. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695, pp. 1–9, available at: http://igraph.org
  9. Flynn, F. J. 2003. How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal 46(5): 539–53.
  10. Freeman, L. C. 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1): 35–41.
  11. Girvan, M. and Newman, M. E. 2002. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(12): 7821–6.
  12. Hanneman, R. A. and Riddle, M. 2005. Introduction to social network methods, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, available at: http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/
  13. Haythornthwaite, C. 1996. Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & Information Science Research 18(4): 323–42.
  14. Krackhardt, D. and Hanson, J. R. 1993. Informal networks. Harvard Business Review 71(4): 104–11.
  15. Lee, S. and Lee, C. 2015. Creative interaction and multiplexity in intraorganizational networks. Management Communication Quarterly 29(1): 56–83.
  16. Monge, P. R. and Contractor, N. S. 2003. Theories of communication networks, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  17. Rank, O. N., Robins, G. L. and Pattison, P. E. 2010. Structural logic of intraorganizational networks. Organization Science 21(3): 745–64.
  18. Trefalt, Š. 2014. How network properties affect one’s ability to obtain benefits: a network simulation. Journal of Management Education 38(5): 672–700.
  19. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  20. Yamaguchi, K. 1994. The flow of information through social networks: diagonal-free measures of inefficiency and the structural determinants of inefficiency. Social Networks 16(1): 57–86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2019-005 | Journal eISSN: 2816-4245 | Journal ISSN: 0226-1766
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 18
Published on: Oct 23, 2019
Published by: International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Seungyoon Lee, Zachary Wittrock, Bailey C. Benedict, published by International Network for Social Network Analysis (INSNA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.