Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure A1
Figure A2
G-transitivity decomposition command line instruction and output in UCINET_
->dsp gtrans(women)
| ||||
1
| 2
| 3
| 4
| |
Level
| Trans
| Intrans
| Possible
| Prop Trans
|
n
| ||||
--------
| --------
| --------
| --------
| |
7
| 0
| 0
| 0
| |
6
| 26
| 0
| 26
| 1
|
5
| 30
| 0
| 30
| 1
|
4
| 160
| 0
| 160
| 1
|
3
| 526
| 4
| 530
| 0.992
|
2
| 2,032
| 44
| 2,076
| 0.979
|
1
| 3,786
| 292
| 4,078
| 0.928
|
0
| 4,448
| 448
| 4,896
| 0.908
|
One mode DGG Women by Women network projection_
| EV | LA | TH | BR | CH | FR | EL | PE | RU | VE | MY | KA | SY | NO | HE | DO | OL | FL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVELYN | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| LAURA | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| THERESA | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| BRENDA | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| CHARLOTTE | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FRANCES | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| ELEANOR | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| PEARL | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| RUTH | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| VERNE | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| MYRNA | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| KATHERINE | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| SYLVIA | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| NORA | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| HELEN | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DOROTHY | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| OLIVIA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| FLORA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
R-square of models predicting performance using betweenness centrality at different levels of dichotomization_
| Dichot. level | R2 |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0.05 |
| 2 | 0.09 |
| 3 | 0.12 |
| 4 | 0.23 |
| 5 | 0.31 |
| 6 | 0.27 |
| 7 | 0.22 |
| 8 | 0.15 |
| 9 | 0.07 |
Number of g-transitive and intransitive triples in the DGG dataset at different dichotomization levels_
| Value | Trans | Intrans |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 26 | 0 |
| 5 | 30 | 0 |
| 4 | 160 | 0 |
| 3 | 526 | 4 |
| 2 | 2,032 | 44 |
| 1 | 3,786 | 292 |
| 0 | 4,448 | 448 |
Z-score, correlation, number of ties and density of the DGG dataset at different dichotomization levels_
| Value | Z-score | Correlation | Ties | Density |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 3.352 | 0.271887 | 2 | 0.006536 |
| 6 | 2.667 | 0.646625 | 16 | 0.052288 |
| 5 | 1.983 | 0.666829 | 18 | 0.058824 |
| 4 | 1.298 | 0.781314 | 48 | 0.156863 |
| 3 | 0.613 | 0.811928 | 92 | 0.300654 |
| 2 | −0.072 | 0.720115 | 190 | 0.620915 |
| 1 | −0.756 | 0.457341 | 278 | 0.908497 |
| 0 | −1.441 | 306 | 1.000000 |