References
- Abu-Lughod, L. & Lutz, C., (eds) 1990. Language and the politics of emotion. Cambridge: University Press.
- Ahmed, S., (2006) ‘Orientations: toward a queer phenomenology’, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 543-574.
- Aull Davies, C., (2007) Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Ball, S., (1990) ‘Self-doubt and soft data: social and technical trajectories in ethnographic fieldwork’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(2), pp. 157–171.
- Bateson, G., (1972). Pasos hacia una ecología de la mente: colección de ensayos en antropología, psiquiatría, evolución y epistemología. Ballantine Books.
- Berná, D., (2018) ‘Públicas, Brujas y Sumisas. La mujer gitana en los discursos de alterización identitaria europea hasta mediados del S.XX’. Rev. Historial Social 93 (93), pp. 33-50.
- Berná, D., (2016) ‘Subjetividad y resistencia desde los márgenes: procesos de articulación identitaria entre los gitanos y gitanas LGTB’. Doctoral Phd. UCM
- Berna, D y Cabezas, A., (2013) ‘Building Process of ‘The Feminine’ as a Gender Base Violence Artefact en Amodeo and Valerio’. Sesso, genere e cultura. Naples: ED. Liguori, pp. 25-53.
- Britzman, D. 2000. ‘The question of belief: writing poststructural ethnography’. In Working the ruins, Edited by: St Pierre, E. and Pillow, W. New York: Routledge.
- Caduff C., (2011) ‘Anthropology’s ethics: moral positionalism, cultural relativism and critical analysis’, Anthropological Theory, 11(4), pp. 465-480.
- Callaway, H., (1992) ‘Ethnography and experience: Gender implications in fieldwork and texts’. Anthropology and autobiography, vol, 29, pp. 29-49.
- Carroll, K.,(2012) ‘Infertile? The emotional labour of sensitive and feminist research methodologies’, Qualitative Research, vol. 13, pp. 546-561.
- Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J., (2003) ‘Ethnography on an awkward scale: Postcolonial anthropology and the violence of abstraction’. Ethnography 4(2), pp. 147–179.
- Csordas, T.J., (2002) ‘Embodiment as a Paradigm for Anthropology.’ Body/meaning/healing. . New York: Palgrave Macmilla, pp. 58-87.
- Csordas, T.J., (1999). ‘Embodiment and Cultural Phenomenology’. In : Gail Weiss y Honi Fern Haber. (1999) Perspectives on embodiment. The intersections of nature and culture. Nueva York, Londres: Routledge, pp. 143-162.
- Davies, J. & Spencer, D., (2010) Emotions in the Field: The Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork Experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Du Preez, J., (2008) ‘Locating the researcher in the research: Personal narrative and reflective practice’. Reflective Practice, 9(4), pp. 509-519.
- Ellis, C.S. & Bochner, A.P., (2006) ‘Analyzing analytic autoethnography an autopsy’. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 429-449.
- Fassin, D., (2011) ‘A contribution to the critique of moral reason’. Anthropological Theory, 11(4), pp.481-491
- Fassin, D., (2008), ‘Beyond good and evil?’. Anthropological Theory, 8(4), pp. 333-344
- Feldman, L. R., & Mandache, L. A., (2019) ‘Emotional overlap and the analytic potential of emotions in anthropology’. Ethnography, 20(2), pp. 227-244.
- García Grinda, J. L., (2002) La arquitectura popular: un camino desde el presente hacia la Edad Media. En Miranda de Ebro en la Edad Media. Ayuntamiento de Miranda de Ebro, pp. 357-434.
- Gaskell, J., (1988) ‘Policy research and politics’. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34(4), pp. 403–417.
- Hawkesworth, M. E., (1989) ‘Knower, knowing, known: feminist theory and claims of truth’. Signs, 14(3), pp. 533–557.
- Haraway, D., (1988) ‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’. Feminist Studies, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 575-599.
- Harding, S.G., (1987) ‘Introduction: Is there feminist method?’, in: S. Harding (Ed.) Feminism and methodologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Harding, S.G., (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women’s Lives. New York: Cornell University Press.
- Harding, S.G., (2002) ‘Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is – strong objectivity?’, inAlcoff, L. and Potter, E. (Eds), Feminist Epistemology. New York, NY: Routledge., pp. 49-82.
- Hammers, C., & Brown, A. D., (2004) ‘Towards a feminist–queer alliance: a paradigmatic shift in the research process’. Social epistemology, 18(1), pp. 85-101.
- Hertz, R., 1997. Reflexivity and Voice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Hymes, D., (1993) ‘¿Qué es la etnografía?’, en H. Velasco; F. G. García y A. Díaz de Rada (ed.). Lecturas de antropología para educadores. Madrid: Trotta, pp. 175-192.
- Jaggar, A.M., (1989) ‘Love and knowledge: emotion in feminist epistemology’. Inquiry, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 151-176.
- Jociles, M I., (2006) ‘La imposición de los pontos de vista durante la entrevista etnográfica’. Antropología portuguesa, vol. 22.
- Jociles, M I., (1999) ‘Observación participante y distancia antropológica’, R.D.T.P. 54 (2), pp. 5-58
- Kleinman, S., & Copp, M. A., (1993). Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publications.
- Kondo, D., (1986) ‘Dissolution and reconstitution of self: Implications for anthropological epistemology’. Cultural anthropology 1.1., pp. 74-88.
- Lather, P., (1991) Getting smart: feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
- Lather, P., (1993) ‘Fertile obsession: validity after poststructuralism’. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), pp. 673–693.
- Lee-Treweek, G., (2000) ‘The insight of emotional danger: research experiences in a home for older people’ in Lee-Treweek, G and Linkogle, S(edt)(. 2000) Danger in the Field: Ethics and Risk in Social Research. Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 114-136.
- Levy, N., (2016) ‘Emotional landscapes; discomfort in the field’. Qualitative Research Journal, 16(1), pp. 39–50.
- Lynch, M., (2000) ‘Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge’. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(3), pp. 26-54.
- Lutz, C.A., (1988) Unnatural emotions: everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to Western theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Mead, M., (1983) ‘Cartas de una antropóloga’. Bruguera; Emecé.
- Merleau-Ponty, M., [1956-1960] (1995) La nature. Notes cours du Collège de France. París: Seuil.
- Pillow, W., (2003) ‘Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), pp. 175–196.
- Pritchard, E., (1973) ‘Some Recollections on Fieldwork in the Twenties’. Anthropological Quarterly, 46:4 (Oct.),pp. 235-242.
- Punch, M., (1986) The politics and ethics of fieldwork. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
- Pollard, A., (2009) ‘Field of screams: difficulty and ethnographic fieldwork’. Anthropology Matters, Vol. 11 No. 2.
- Rosaldo, M., (1980) Knowledge and passion: Ilongot notions of self and social life. Cambridge: University Press.
- Rosaldo, R., (1989). Culture and truth: Renewing the anthropologist’s search for meaning. Beacon Press.
- Sedgwick, E. K., (2008[1990]). Epistemology of the Closet. California: Univ of California Press.
- Smith, D. E., (1987) The everyday world as problematic. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
- Stengers, I., (2000) ‘The invention of modern science’. (Vol. 19). U of Minnesota Press.
- Wolf, D.L., (1996) ‘Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork’, in Wolf, D.L. (Ed.), Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. Westview: Boulder, CO, pp. 1-55.