Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The implied border mechanisms of Antarctica: Arguing the case for an Antarctic borderscape

Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. Antarctica New Zealand 2015, ‘Waste Management 2015-2016’, Antarctica New Zealand, viewed 3 January 2020, https://www.antarcticanz.govt.nz/uploads/images/151020-FINAL-Waste-Management-2015-16.pdf
  2. Antarctica New Zealand 2019a, Antarctica New Zealand Annual Report 2018-2019 Annual, Christchurch, New Zealand: Antarctica New Zealand, viewed 9 January 2020, https://www.antarcticanz.govt.nz/uploads/images/001490_ANZ_annual-report_2018-19_final.pdf
  3. Antarctica New Zealand 2019b, ‘Statement of intent 2019-2023’, New Zealand Government, 7 January 2020, https://www.antarcticanz.govt.nz/uploads/images/Antarctica-New-Zealaand-SOI-2019-2023.pdf
  4. Antarctica New Zealand n.d.-a, ‘Community Engagement Programme’, Antarctica New Zealand, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.antarcticanz.govt.nz/media/community-engagement
  5. Antarctica New Zealand n.d.-b, ‘History’, Antarctica New Zealand, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.antarcticanz.govt.nz/scott-base/history?token=hsz24l1nbesnfwrzu0wbk-zgiymyisxh%2525252527
  6. Antarctica New Zealand n.d.-c, ‘Protecting Special Areas’, Antarctica New Zealand, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.antarcticanz.govt.nz/environment/protecting-special-areas
  7. Antarctica New Zealand n.d.-d, ‘Travelling to Antarctica’, Antarctica New Zealand, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.antarcticanz.govt.nz/education/travelling-to-antarctica.
  8. Argentine Republic 2018, Gateways to Antarctica: facilitation of access to Antarctica for purposes of scientific and technical activities in the framework of the Antarctic Treaty Information paper No. IP65, Buenos Aires: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, viewed 7 January, 2020, https://www.ats.aq/devAS/Meetings/Documents/85.
  9. ATCM 1991, ‘The Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty’, Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty, viewed 7 January 2020, https://documents.ats.aq/cep/handbook/Protocol_e.pdf
  10. ATCM 2017, Compilation of key documents of the Antarctic Treaty System, Buenos Aires: Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty, viewed 7 January 2020, https://documents.ats.aq/atcm40/ww/ATCM40_ww014_e.pdf
  11. ATCM XXXIX 2016, ‘Information Exchange Requirements’, Antarctic Treaty Secretariat, viewed 15 March 2020, https://www.ats.aq/devAS/info_measures_listitem.aspx?lang=e&id=635
  12. Brady, A-M 2017, China’s expanding Antarctic interests: Implications for Australia, Special Report, Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.aspi.org.au/report/chinas-expanding-interests-antarctica
  13. Brambilla, C 2015, ‘Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept’ Geopolitics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 14–34, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2014.884561
  14. Brambilla, C, Laine, J, Bocchi, G, Laine, J, & Bocchi, G 2016, April 15, ‘Introduction: Thinking, Mapping, Acting and Living Borders under Contemporary Globalisation’, doi: 10.4324/9781315569765-6
  15. Bray, D 2016, ‘The geopolitics of Antarctic governance: sovereignty and strategic denial in Australia’s Antarctic policy’ Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 256–274, doi: 10.1080/10357718.2015.1135871
  16. Brunet-Jailly, E (ed.) 2007, Borderlands: Comparing Border Security in North America and Europe, University of Ottawa, Ottawa.
  17. Cassidy, K, Yuval-Davis, N, & Wemyss, G 2018, ‘Debordering and everyday (re)bordering in and of Dover: Post-borderland borderscapes’ Political Geography, vol. 66, pp. 171–179, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.04.005.
  18. CCAMLR 2018, December 7, ‘Secretariat’, CCAMLR Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.ccamlr.org/en/organisation/secretariat.
  19. CCAMLR 2019, December 10, ‘Map of the CAMLR Convention Area’, CCAMLR Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, viewed 2 January, 2020, https://www.ccamlr.org/en/document/organisation/map-ccamlr-convention-area.
  20. ChristchurchNZ 2017, ‘Christchurch—The Gateway to Antarctica’, ChristchurchNZ, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.christchurchnz.com/christchurch-the-gateway-to-antarctica/.
  21. Collis, C 2017, ‘Territories beyond possession? Antarctica and Outer Space’ The Polar Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 287–302, doi: 10.1080/2154896X.2017.1373912.
  22. COMNAP n.d., ‘Contact’, COMNAP Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.comnap.aq/Contact/SitePages/Home.aspx.
  23. Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs 1993, ‘COMNAP Visitors’ Guide to the Antarctic’, Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.comnap.aq/Publications/Comnap%20Publications/comnap_guidelines_visitguide_1995.pdf.
  24. Dodds, K. 2017, ‘Antarctic Geopolitics’ in K. Dodds, A. D. Hemmings, & P. Roberts (eds.), Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica, pp. 199–214, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK, viewed 3 January 2020, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/massey/reader.action?docID=4800103&ppg=219.
  25. European Office of the United Nations 1947, Adoption and Signature of the Final Act, Press Release No. 469, Geneva: Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment, viewed 3 January, 2020, http://sul-derivatives.stanford.edu/derivative?CSNID=90260240&mediaType=application/pdf.
  26. Ferrada, LV 2018, ‘Five factors that will decide the future of Antarctica’ The Polar Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 84–109, doi: 10.1080/2154896X.2018.1468623.
  27. GlobalSecurity.org 2020, ‘T-AK 2050 Green Wave’, GlobalSecurity.org, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/tak-2050.htm.
  28. Goff, PM 2000, ‘Invisible Borders: Economic Liberalization and National Identity’ International Studies Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 533–562, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3014032.
  29. Hall, CM 2015, ‘Polar gateways: approaches, issues and review’ The Polar Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 257–277, doi: 10.1080/2154896X.2015.1080511.
  30. Haward, M & Cooper, N 2014, ‘Australian interests, bifocalism, bipartisanship, and the Antarctic Treaty System’ Polar Record, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 60–71, doi: 10.1017/S0032247412000459.
  31. Heininen, L & Zebich-Knos, M 2012, ‘Polar Regions – Comparing Arctic and Antarctic Border Debates’ in The Routledge research companion to border studies, pp. 195–218, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Surrey, England, viewed 2 March 2020, https://www-taylorfrancis-com.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/books/e/9781315612782
  32. Hemmings, AD 2017, ‘Antarctic politics in a transforming geopolitics’ in K. Dodds, A. D. Hemmings, & P. Roberts (eds.), Handbook of Politics in Antarctica, pp. 507–522, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK, viewed 4 January 2020, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/massey/reader.action?docID=4800103&ppg=219.
  33. Hyvärinen, M, Hatavara, M, & Hydén, L-C (eds.) 2013, The Travelling Concepts of Narrative, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, viewed 7 January 2020, http://ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=595648&site=eds-live&scope=site.
  34. Immigration New Zealand n.d., ‘Information about: Antarctic Traveller Visitor Visa’, Immigration New Zealand, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.immigration.govt.nz/new-zealand-visas/apply-for-a-visa/visa-factsheet/antarctic-travellers-visitor-visa
  35. International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators 2019, IAATO Overview of Antarctic Tourism: 2018-19 Season and Preliminary Estimates for 2019-20 Season, Information paper No. IP 140 Rev.1, pp. 1–30, Prague: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, viewed 4 January 2020, https://www.ats.aq/devAS/Meetings/DocDatabase?cx=000635445009649447825:6k022emqbmy&cof=FORID:11&ie=UTF-8&q=tourism&sa=FullTextSearch&qvalue=tourism&fromValue=0&toValue=0&langValue=en&lr=lang_en
  36. Johnson, C, Jones, R, Paasi, A, Amoore, L, Mountz, A, Salter, M, & Rumford, C 2011, ‘Interventions on rethinking “the border” in border studies’ Political Geography, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 61–69, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.002.
  37. Keane, J n.d., ‘Antarctica: Notes on the Fate of Sovereignty’, The Conversation, viewed 7 January 2020, http://theconversation.com/antarctica-notes-on-the-fate-of-sovereignty-28292
  38. Konrad, V, Laine, JP, Liikanen, I, Scott, JW, & Widdis, R 2018, ‘The Language of Borders’ in S. D. Brunn & R. Kehrein (eds.), Handbook of the Changing World Language Map, pp. 1–17, Springer International Publishing, Cham, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_52-1
  39. Kramer, M 2013, August 14, ‘The Physics Behind Schrödinger’s Cat Paradox’, National Geographic, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/8/130812-physics-schrodinger-erwin-google-doodle-cat-paradox-science/
  40. Law, J 2002, Aircraft stories: decentering the object in technoscience, Duke University Press, Durham [N.C.]: London.
  41. Massey, D 2009, ‘Concepts of space and power in theory and in political practice’ Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, no. 55, pp. 15–26, doi: 10.1234/no.disponible.a.RACO.171747
  42. Mezzadra, S & Neilson, B 2013, Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor, Duke University Press, Durham and London, viewed 8 November 2019, http://books.google.com/books/about/Border_as_Method_or_the_Multiplication_o.html?id=-ji2AgAAQBAJ
  43. Ministry of Defence 2019, ‘Defence Capability Plan 2019’, New Zealand Government, viewed 24 November 2019, https://www.defence.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/03acb8c6aa/Defence-Capability-Plan-2019.pdf
  44. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade 2005, ‘New Zealand Procedures for Non-Governmental Visitors to Antarctica’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, New Zealand, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.mfat.govt.nz/assets/Environment/Antarctica-and-the-Southern-Ocean/EIA-form.pdf
  45. Murray, C 2005, ‘Mapping Terra Incognita’ Polar Record, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 103–112, doi: 10.1017/S0032247405004249
  46. New Zealand Customs Service 2015, ‘Customs’ information framework and goals’, New Zealand Customs Service, viewed 8 January 2020, https://www.customs.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/corporate-documents/c-and-e-act-1996-review-discussion-paper-information-2015.pdf
  47. New Zealand Customs Service 2017a, ‘Statement of Intent 2017-2021’, New Zealand Customs Service, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.customs.govt.nz/globalassets/documents/corporate-documents/statement-of-intent-2017-2021.pdf
  48. New Zealand Customs Service 2017b, September 26, ‘Border sector’, New Zealand Customs Service, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.customs.govt.nz/about-us/border-sector/
  49. New Zealand Defence Force n.d., ‘Antarctica’, New Zealand Defence Force, viewed 7 January 2020, http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/operations/antarctica.htm.
  50. New Zealand Government 2017, May 2, ‘Territorial Sea, Contiguous Zone, and Exclusive Economic Zone Act 1977’, Parliamentary Counsel Office, viewed 7 January 2020, http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1977/0028/latest/DLM442587.html
  51. New Zealand Government 2018, July, ‘Strategic Defence Policy Statement 2018’, Ministry of Defence, New Zealand, viewed 24 November 2019 www.nzdf.mil.nz/downloads/pdf/public-docs/2018/strategic-defence-policy-statement-2018.pdf
  52. New Zealand Government & United States Government 1958, Memorandum of Understanding, New Zealand Government & United States Government.
  53. New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade n.d., ‘Antarctica and the Southern Ocean’, New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/environment/antarctica/
  54. Newman, D 2006, ‘Borders and bordering: Towards an interdisciplinary dialogue’ European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 171, doi: 10.1177/1368431006063331
  55. Newman, D & Paasi, A 1998, ‘Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography’ Progress in Human Geography, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 186, doi: 10.1191/030913298666039113
  56. Nicklin, G 2015, August 23, Trans-Tasman Border Stories: Actor-Network Theory and Policy Narrative in Action, Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, N.Z, viewed 3 January 2020, http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/4704?show=full.
  57. Nicklin, G 2019a, ‘Dynamic narrative: a new framework for policy success’ International Review of Public Policy, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 171–191, doi: 10.4000/IRPP.310.
  58. Nicklin, G 2019b, ‘Turning attention to the layered and dispersed access management system of the Antarctic Treaty System’ The Polar Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–21, doi: 10.1080/2154896X.2019.1685170.
  59. Paasi, A 2011, ‘A “Border theory”: an unattainable dream or a realistic aim for border scholars?’ in D. Wastl-Walter (ed.), The Routledge Research Companion to Border Studies, Ashgate, Aldershot, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www-taylorfrancis-com.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/books/e/9781315612782
  60. Paasi, A 2013, ‘Borders’ in Klaus Dodds, M. Kuus, & J. Sharp (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Critical Geopolitics, Ashgate, London, https://www-taylorfrancis-com.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/books/e/9781315612874
  61. Prescott, JRV & Triggs, GD 2008, International frontiers and boundaries., [electronic resource], Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden; Boston, viewed 4 January 2020, http://ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/login?url=https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=312555&site=eds-live&scope=site.
  62. Reissman, CK 1993, Narrative analysis, qualitative research methods series (Vol. 30), London: Sage Publications Inc.
  63. Rumford, C 2014, ‘’Seeing Like a Border’: Towards Multiperspectivalism’ in Cosmopolitan Borders, pp. 39–54, Springer, doi:10.1057/9781137351401_3
  64. Rumley, D & Minghi, J 2015, ‘Introduction: the Border Landscape Concept’ in The Geography of Border Landscapes, pp. 1–309, viewed 4 November 2019, https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/8498
  65. Russian Federation 2016, On “openness” of the gateway to the Antarctic, Working Paper No. WP039 rev.1, Santiago, Chile: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.ats.aq/devAS/ats_meetings_doc_database.aspx?lang=e&menu=2
  66. Sack, RD 1983, ‘Human Territoriality: A Theory’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 55–74, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1983.tb01396.x
  67. Salter, MB 2012, ‘Theory of the / : The Suture and Critical Border Studies’ Geopolitics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 734–755, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2012.660580
  68. Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty 2017, Final Report of the Fortieth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, No. XL, Beijing, China: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, viewed 7 January 2020, https://documents.ats.aq/ATCM40/fr/ATCM40_fr001_e.pdf
  69. Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty 2020a, ‘ATCM and Other Meetings’, Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.ats.aq/e/atcm.html
  70. Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty 2020b, ‘Parties’, Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.ats.aq/devAS/Parties?lang=e
  71. Sohn, C 2016, ‘Navigating borders’ multiplicity: the critical potential of assemblage’ Area, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 183–189, doi: 10.1111/area.12248.
  72. South Africa 2017, Gateway Access: Transit Visa Developments in South Africa, Information paper No. IP33, China: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, viewed 7 January 2020, https://www.ats.aq/devAS/Meetings/Documents/82.
  73. Swanson, JR, Liggett, D, & Roldan, G 2015, ‘Conceptualizing and enhancing the argument for port state control in the Antarctic gateway states’ The Polar Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 361–385, doi: 10.1080/2154896X.2015.1082785
  74. Szary, A-LA & Giraut, F 2015, ‘Borderities: The politics of contemporary mobile borders’ in Borderities and the politics of contemporary mobile borders, pp. 1–19, Springer, viewed 8 March 2020, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2195/ba94dea320430d395e76bb8f598b856ab505.pdf
  75. UNSCR 2001, Security Council Resolution 1373—UNSCR: Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts. Resolution, United Nations Security Council, viewed 15 March 2020, http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/doc/1373
  76. Walters, W 2004, ‘The Frontiers of the European Union: A Geostrategic Perspective’ Geopolitics, vol. 9, pp. 674–698, doi: 10.1080/14650040490478738
  77. Wastl-Walter, D (ed.) 2016, The Routledge research companion to border studies, Ashgate, viewed 3 January 2020, https://www-taylorfrancis-com.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/books/e/9781315612782
  78. Wilson, TM & Donnan, H (eds.) 2012, ‘Borders and Border Studies’ in A Companion to Border Studies, pp. 1–25, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, doi: 10.1002/9781118255223.ch1
  79. World Bank, McLinden, G, Fanta, E, Widdowson, D, & Doyle, T 2010, Border Management Modernization, World Bank Publications, Herndon, United States, viewed 15 March 2020, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/massey/detail.action?docID=660570.
  80. World Customs Organization 2008, Customs in the 21st Century—Enhancing Growth and Development through Trade Facilitation and Border Security, Meeting No. Annex II to Doc. SC0090E1a, Brussels: World Customs Organization, viewed 3 January 2020, http://www.wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/key-issues/customs-in-the-21st-century/annexes/annex_ii_en.pdf?db=web
  81. World Customs Organization n.d., ‘WCO Customs Risk Management Compendium Volume 1’, World Customs Organization, viewed 3 January 2020, http://www.wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/enforcement-and-compliance/activities-and-programmes/risk-management-and-intelligence/risk-management-compendium-volume-1.pdf?db=web
  82. World Economic Forum 2007, The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2007: Furthering the Process of Economic Development, Geneva, viewed 8 March 2020, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3367&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  83. Yanow, D 2000, Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks California, viewed 8 March 2020, http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/conducting-interpretive-policy-analysis/n6.xml
Language: English
Page range: 27 - 62
Published on: Apr 27, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Germana Nicklin, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.