References
- 1. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Kaczynski R, Shunock M. Early treatment outcome assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:544-50.10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70277-5
- 2. Summers CJ. The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. Am J Orthod 1971;59:552-67.10.1016/0002-9416(71)90002-9
- 3. Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:589-99.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70179-9
- 4. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180-7.10.1093/ejo/14.3.180
- 5. DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KW, Vig PS, Weyant RJ, O’Brien K. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:172-6.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70133-8
- 6. Hamdan AM, Rock WP. An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:181-92.10.1093/ejo/21.2.181
- 7. O’Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod 1993;20:25-35.10.1179/bjo.20.1.25
- 8. O’Brien KD, Robbins R, Vig KW, Vig PS, Shnorhokian H, Weyant R. The effectiveness of Class II, division 1 treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:329-34.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70149-4
- 9. Richmond S, Andrews M. Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:7-15.10.1093/ejo/15.1.78436199
- 10. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD et al. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:125-39.10.1093/ejo/14.2.1251582457
- 11. Firestone AR, Beck FM, Beglin FM, Vig KW. Evaluation of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an index of orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:463-9.10.1067/mod.2002.128465
- 12. McKnight MM, Daniels CP, Johnston LE Jr. A retrospective study of two-stage treatment outcomes assessed with two modified PAR indices. Angle Orthod 1998;68:521-4; discussion 525-6.
- 13. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications, 1940.
- 14. Richmond S. Personal audit in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1993;20:135-44.10.1179/bjo.20.2.135
- 15. Dyken RA, Sadowsky PL, Hurst D. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the peer assessment rating index. Angle Orthod 2001;71:164-9.
- 16. al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van ‘t Hof MA. Occlusal outcome of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1998;68:439-44.
- 17. Buchanan IB, Russell JI, Clark JD. Practical application of the PAR index: an illustrative comparison of the outcome of treatment using two fixed appliance techniques. Br J Orthod 1996;23:351-7.10.1179/bjo.23.4.351
- 18. Fox NA. The first 100 cases: a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (peer assessment rating) index. Br Dent J 1993;174:290-7.10.1038/sj.bdj.4808157
- 19. Kerr WJ, Buchanan IB, McColl JH. Use of the PAR index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances. Br J Orthod 1993;20:351-7.10.1179/bjo.20.4.351
- 20. Shaw WC, Richmond S, O’Brien KD, Brook P, Stephens CD. Quality control in orthodontics: indices of treatment need and treatment standards. Br Dent J 1991;170:107-12.10.1038/sj.bdj.4807429
- 21. Yang-Powers LC, Sadowsky C, Rosenstein S, BeGole EA. Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:451-5.10.1067/mod.2002.128464
- 22. Pickering EA, Vig P. The occlusal index used to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1975;2:47-51.10.1179/bjo.2.1.47
- 23. Tahir E, Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ. An assessment of treatment outcome in American Board of Orthodontics cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:335-42.10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70193-8
- 24. Ngan P, Yiu C. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:414-20.10.1067/mod.2000.10825311029737
- 25. Birkeland K, Furevik J, Bøe OE, Wisth PJ. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:279-88.10.1093/ejo/19.3.2799239958
- 26. Taylor PJ, Kerr WJ, McColl JH. Factors associated with the standard and duration of orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1996;23:335-41.10.1179/bjo.23.4.3358985571