Innovation in prediction planning for anterior open bite correction

Almuzian, Mohammed; Almukhtar, Anas; O’Neil, Michael; Benington, Philip; Al Anezi, Thamer; Ayoub, Ashraf

doi:10.21307/aoj-2020-143

Abstract

This study applies recent advances in 3D virtual imaging for application in the prediction planning of dentofacial deformities. Stereo-photogrammetry has been used to create virtual and physical models, which are creatively combined in planning the surgical correction of anterior open bite. The application of these novel methods is demonstrated through the surgical correction of a case.

References

1. Kim YH. Anterior openbite and its treatment with multiloop edgewise archwire. Angle Orthod 1987;57:290-321.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Enacar A, Ugur T, Toroglu S. A method for correction of open bite. J clin orthod 1996:30:43-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Kiliaridis S, Egermark I, Thilander B. Anterior open bite treatment with magnets. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:447-57.10.1093/ejo/12.4.447
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Park YC, Lee HA, Choi NC, Kim DH. Open bite correction by intrusion of posterior teeth with miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2008;78:699-710.10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0699:OBCBIO]2.0.CO;2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Sugawara J, Baik UB, Umemori M, Takahashi I, Nagasaka H, Kawamura H et al. Treatment and posttreatment dentoalveolar changes following intrusion of mandibular molars with application of a skeletal anchorage system (SAS) for open bite correction. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2002;17:243-53.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Bailey LJ, Collie FM, White RP Jr. Long-term soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1996;11:7-18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Konstiantos KA, O’Reilly MT, Close J. The validity of the prediction of soft tissue profile changes after LeFort I osteotomy using the dentofacial planner (computer software). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:241-9.10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70117-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Eckhardt CE, Cunningham SJ. How predictable is orthognathic surgery? Eur J Orthod 2004;26:303-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Smith JD, Thomas PM, Proffit WR. A comparison of current prediction imaging programs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:527-36.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Pospisil OA. Reliability and feasibility of prediction tracing in orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1987;15:79-83.10.1016/S1010-5182(87)80023-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Kolokitha OE, Topouzelis N. Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2011;10:236-45.10.1007/s12663-011-0228-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Swennen GR, Mollemans W, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2080-92.10.1016/j.joms.2009.06.007
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Swennen GR, Mollemans W, De Clercq C, Abeloos J, Lamoral P, Lippens F et al. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:297-307.10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181996803
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Walker F, Ayoub AF, Moos KF, Barbenel J. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow. B J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;46:567-72.10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.02.015
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. O’Malley AM, Milosevic A. Comparison of three facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems for planning orthognathic surgery. B J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;38:185-90.10.1054/bjom.1999.0182
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. O’Neil M, Khambay B, Bowman A, Moos KF, Barbenel J, Walker F et al. Validation of a new method for building a three-dimensional physical model of the skull and dentition. B J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50:49-54.10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.11.00921194815
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Lundström A, Lundström F, Lebret LM, Moorrees CF. Natural head position and natural head orientation: basic considerations in cephalometric analysis and research. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:111-20.10.1093/ejo/17.2.1117781719
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:609-25.10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.02819464146
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bergé SJ. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:341-52.10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.01321095103
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Innovation in prediction planning for anterior open bite correction

Abstract

Paradigm

My account