Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of validity, repeatability and reproducibility of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) between digital and conventional study models Cover

Comparison of validity, repeatability and reproducibility of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) between digital and conventional study models

Open Access
|Jul 2021

Authors

Sridhar Pasapula

spasapula5@gmail.com

Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Martyn Sherriff

martyn.Sherriff@bristol.ac.uk

King’s College London, London, UK

Jeremy Breckon

jeremy.breckon@kcl.ac.uk

Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Dirk Bister

dirk.bister@kcl.ac.uk

Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Stefan Abela

abelastefan@gmail.com

Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-126 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 184 - 192
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2015
|
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2016
|
Published on: Jul 30, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Sridhar Pasapula, Martyn Sherriff, Jeremy Breckon, Dirk Bister, Stefan Abela, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.