The Herbst appliance and the Activator: influence of the vertical facial pattern
References
- 1. Woods MG. Sagittal mandibular changes with overbite correction in subjects with different mandibular growth directions: late mixed-dentition treatment effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:388-94.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.037
- 2. McNamara JA Jr. Components of Class II malocclusions in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981;51:177-202.
- 3. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Class II Division 2 malocclusion: genetics or environment? A case report of monozygotic twins. Angle Orthod 1999;69:321-4.
- 4. Moss ML, Salentijn L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod 1969;55:566-77.10.1016/0002-9416(69)90034-7
- 5. Phan KL, Bendeus M, Hägg U, Hansen K, Rabie AB. Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance – effects and posttreatment changes. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:594-604.10.1093/ejo/cjl05217142260
- 6. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:599.e1-12.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.01016679196
- 7. Bock N, Pancherz H. Herbst treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types – A cephalometric long-term retrospective study. Angle Orthod 2006;76:930-41.10.2319/100605-35217090166
- 8. Björk A. Variations in the growth patterns of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 1963;42:400-11.10.1177/0022034563042001470113971295
- 9. Pepicelli AJ, Woods MG, Briggs C. The mandibular muscles and their importance in contemporary orthodontics: a contemporary review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:774-80.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.02316360920
- 10. Chan HJ, Woods MG, Stella D. Three-dimensional computed craniofacial tomography (3D-CT): potential uses and limitations. Aust Orthod J 2007;23:55-64.
- 11. Chan HJ, Woods MG, Stella D. Mandibular muscle morphology in children with different vertical facial patterns: A 3-dimensional computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:10.e1-13.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.01318174063
- 12. Wong A, Woods MG, Stella D. Three-dimensional computed tomographic assessment of mandibular muscles in growing subjects with different vertical facial patterns. Aust Orthod J 2016;32:2-17.10.21307/aoj-2020-107
- 13. Baltromejus S, Ruf S, Pancherz H. Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:627-37.10.1093/ejo/24.6.62712512780
- 14. Woods MG. The use of a simple functional appliance as an adjunct to fixed appliance orthodontic treatment. Case reports. Aust Dent J 1996;41:221-34.10.1111/j.1834-7819.1996.tb04864.x
- 15. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 2005;11:119-29.10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005
- 16. Franchi L and Baccetti T. Prediction of individual mandibular changes induced by functional jaw orthopedics followed by fixed appliances in Class II patients. Angle Orthod 2006;76:950-4.10.2319/110205-385
- 17. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA, Hunter WS. An atlas of craniofacial growth: cephalometric standards from the University School Growth Study, Centre for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1974.
- 18. Hägg U, Rabie AB, Bendeus M, Wong RW, Wey MC, Du X et al. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:525-3610.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.064
- 19. Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopedics or orthognathic surgery: is it a matter of age? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:571-4.
- 20. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:607-18.10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70285-4
- 21. Ruf S, Pancherz H. The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: A cephalometric roentgenographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:225-9.10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70113-0
- 22. Pancherz H, Michailidou C. Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:153-61.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.07.01515316469
- 23. Shell TL, Woods MG. Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 2003;73:365-73.
- 24. Shell TL, Woods MG. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical Class II treatment. Aust Orthod J 2004;20:51-63.
- 25. Deen E, Woods MG. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns. Aust Orthod J 2015;31:59-68.10.21307/aoj-2020-141
- 26. Brodie AG. Facial patterns: a theme on variation. Angle Orthod 1946;16:75-87.
Language: English
Page range: 130 - 138
Submitted on: May 1, 2016
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2016
Published on: Jul 30, 2021
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Related subjects:
© 2021 Christopher Turnock, Michael G. Woods, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.