Comparison of traditional orthodontic polishing systems with novel non-orthodontic methods for residual adhesive removal
References
- 1. Kim K, Heimisdottir K, Gebauer U, Persson GR. Clinical and microbiological findings at sites treated with orthodontic fixed appliances in adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:223-8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.027
- 2. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dent Orthop 1998;114:80-7.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70242-2
- 3. Velo S, Carano A, Carano A. Self-etching vs. traditional bonding systems in orthodontics: and in vitro study. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2002;5:166-9.10.1034/j.1600-0544.2002.02193.x
- 4. Vieira AC, Pinto RA, Chevitarese O, Almeida MA. Polishing after debracketing: its influence upon enamel surface. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1993;18:7-11.
- 5. Campbell PM. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 1995;65:103-10.
- 6. Franklin E. Enamel damage during adhesive removal leads to big malpractice claims. The AAO Bulletin. February 2015;33:24-5.
- 7. Webb BJ, Koch J, Hagan JL, Ballard RW, Armbruster PC. Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols. J Orthod [Internet]. 2015 Aug 18.10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000009
- 8. Caspersen I. Residual acrylic adhesive after removal of plastic orthodontic brackets: a scanning electron microscopic study. Am J Orthod 1997;71:637-50.10.1016/0002-9416(77)90280-9
- 9. Zachrisson BU, Arthun J. Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1979;75:121-7.10.1016/0002-9416(79)90181-7
- 10. Rouleau BD Jr, Marshall GW Jr, Cooley RO. Enamel surface evaluations after clinical treatment and removal of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1982;81:423-6.10.1016/0002-9416(82)90081-1
- 11. Ulusoy C. Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:209-15.10.1590/S1678-77572009000300015
- 12. Price RB, Sutow EJ. Micrographic and profilometric evaluation of the finish produced by diamond and tungsten carbide finishing burs on enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:311-610.1016/0022-3913(88)90275-2
- 13. Reliance Orthodontic Products. Viewed 12 February 2016,
- 14. Zarrinnia K, Eid NM, Kehoe MJ. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:284-9310.1016/S0889-5406(95)70023-4
- 15. Thomas BW, Hook CR, Draughn RA. Laser-aided degradation of composite resin. Angle Orthod 1996;66:281-6.
- 16. Radlanski RJ. A new carbide finishing bur for bracket debonding. J Orofac Orthop 2001;62:296-304.10.1007/PL00001937
- 17. Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/Polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004;29:275-9.
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 47
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2015
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2016
Published on: Jul 30, 2021
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2021 John Andrews, Joseph L. Hagan, Paul C. Armbruster, Richard W. Ballard, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.