Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Reducing iatrogenic complications in the treatment of cleft lip and palate

Australasian Orthodontic Journal
Volume 35 (2019): Issue 2 (January 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2021

References

  1. 1. Bell JC, Raynes-Greenow C, Bower C, Turner RM, Roberts CL, Nassar N. Descriptive epidemiology of cleft lip and cleft palate in Western Australia. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2013;97:101-8.10.1002/bdra.23110
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Ranta R. A review of tooth formation in children with cleft lip/ palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90:11-8.10.1016/0889-5406(86)90022-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Allam E, Ghoneima A, Eckert G, Tholpady S, Klene C, Kula K. Molar incisor hypomineralization in the permanent dentition of patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate versus controls. Dent Oral Craniofac Res 2015;1.10.15761/DOCR.1000122
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Malanczuk T, Opitz C, Retzlaff R. Structural changes of dental enamel in both dentitions of cleft lip and palate patients. J Orofac Orthop 1999;60:259-68. [English and German]10.1007/BF0129978410450638
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Saldias-Vargas VP, Tovani-Palone MR, Moura-Martins AP, da Silva-Dalben G, Ribeiro-Gomide M. Enamel defects in permanent first molars and incisors in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina 2014;62:515-9.10.15446/revfacmed.v62n4.45598
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Heitmüller D, Thiering E, Hoffmann U, Heinrich J, Manton D, Kühnisch J et al. Is there a positive relationship between molar incisor hypomineralisations and the presence of dental caries? Int J Paediatr Dent 2013;23:116-24.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Al-Dajani M. Comparison of dental caries prevalence in patients with cleft lip and/or palate and their sibling controls. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009;46:529-31.10.1597/08-003.120050376
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Chapple JR, Nunn JH. The oral health of children with clefts of the lip, palate, or both. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:525-8.10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0525_tohocw_2.0.co_211522175
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Wolff MS, Schenkel AB. The anticaries efficacy of a 1.5% arginine and fluoride toothpaste. Adv Dent Res 2018;29:93-7.10.1177/002203451773529829355420
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. Chang HS, Walsh LJ, Freer TJ. Enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment. Aetiology and prevention. Aust Dent J 1997;42:322-7.10.1111/j.1834-7819.1997.tb00138.x9409049
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Widmer RP, Mekertichian K. Paediatric dentistry--what’s new. A contemporary approach to the art and science of caries risk assessment. Ann Roy Australas Coll Dent Surg 1996;13:119-26.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Derks A, Katsaros C, Frencken JE, van’t Hof MA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Caries-inhibiting effect of preventive measures during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. A systematic review. Caries Res 2004;38:413-20.10.1159/00007962115316184
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. Noble J, Cassolato S, Karaikos N, Wiltshire WA. Point of care. Preventive and interceptive measures for improving and maintaining good oral hygiene and cariogenic control in orthodontic patients. J Can Dent Assoc 2009;75:441-3.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. Ogaard B, Rølla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:68-73.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Sudjalim TR, Woods MG, Manton DJ, Reynolds EC. Prevention of demineralization around orthodontic brackets in vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:705.e1-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.04317561043
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. Hadler-Olsen S, Sandvik K, El-Agroudi MA, Øgaard B. The incidence of caries and white spot lesions in orthodontically treated adolescents with a comprehensive caries prophylactic regimen--a prospective study. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:633-9.10.1093/ejo/cjr06821750245
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. Craig GC. How to handle white spot lesions associated with orthodontic treatment. Dental Outlook 2013:1-5.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Manton DJ. Diagnosis of the early carious lesion. Aust Dent J 2013;58 Suppl 1:35-9.10.1111/adj.1204823721336
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Yeoh ES, Le T, Maravilla J, O’Rourke V, He Y, Ye Q. Clinical evidence in the treatment of white spot lesions following fixed orthodontic therapy: a meta analysis. Aust Orthod J 2018;34:45-60.10.21307/aoj-2020-058
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Maxfield BJ, Hamdan AM, Tüfekçi E, Shroff B, Best AM, Lindauer SJ. Development of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: perceptions of patients, parents, orthodontists, and general dentists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:337-44.10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.02422381494
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. Jälevik B. Enamel hypomineralization in permanent first molars. A clinical, histo-morphological and biochemical study. Swed Dent J Suppl 2001;149:1-86.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Garot E, Rouas P, D’Incau E, Lenoir N, Manton D, Couture-Veschambre C. Mineral density of hypomineralised and sound enamel. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 2016;53:e33.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Farah RA, Swain MV, Drummond BK, Cook R, Atieh M. Mineral density of hypomineralised enamel. J Dent 2010;38:50-8.10.1016/j.jdent.2009.09.00219737596
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. Mast P, Rodrigueztapia MT, Daeniker L, Krejci I. Understanding MIH: definition, epidemiology, differential diagnosis and new treatment guidelines. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2013;14:204-8.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. Gambetta-Tessini K, Mariño R, Ghanim A, Calache H, Manton DJ. Knowledge, experience and perceptions regarding Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation (MIH) amongst Australian and Chilean public oral health care practitioners. BMC Oral Health 2016;16:75.10.1186/s12903-016-0279-8499109927539252
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Shubha AB, Hegde S. Molar-incisor hypomineralization: review of its prevalence, etiology, clinical appearance and management. Int J Oral Maxillofac Path 2013;4:26-33.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. 27. Weerheijm KL, Jälevik B, Alaluusua S. Molar-incisor hypomineralisation. Caries Res 2001;35:390-1.10.1159/00004747911641576
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. 28. Noble J, Karaiskos NE, Wiltshire WA. What additional precautions should I take when bonding to severely fluorotic teeth? J Can Dent Assoc 2008;74:891-2.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. 29. Gambetta-Tessini K, Mariño R, Ghanim A, Calache H, Manton DJ. Carious lesion severity and demarcated hypomineralised lesions of tooth enamel in schoolchildren from Melbourne, Australia. Aust Dent J 2018. [Epub ahead of print]10.1111/adj.1262629876927
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. 30. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53.10.1177/0022034555034006080113271655
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. 31. Schneider PM, Silva M. Endemic molar incisor hypomineralization: a pandemic problem that requires monitoring by the entire health care community. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2018;16:283-8.10.1007/s11914-018-0444-x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. 32. Diedrich P. Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: a study with the scanning electron microscope. Am J Orthod 1981;79:500-22.10.1016/S0002-9416(81)90462-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. 33. Yassaei S, Davari A, Goldani Moghadam M, Kamaei A. Comparison of shear bond strength of RMGI and composite resin for orthodontic bracket bonding. J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11:282-9.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. 34. Fowler PV. A twelve-month clinical trial comparing the bracket failure rates of light-cured resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive and acid-etch chemical-cured composite. Aust Orthod J 1998;15:186-90.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. 35. Fricker JP. A new self-curing resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:384-6.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70112-X
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. 36. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Retention of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified GIC versus composite resin adhesives—a quantitative systematic review of clinical trials. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1-14.10.1007/s00784-011-0626-822006128
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. 37. Summers A, Kao E, Gilmore J, Gunel E, Ngan P. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:200-6.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.01315316475
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. 38. Reynolds I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8.10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. 39. Gjorgievska E, Nicholson JW, Grcev AT. Ion migration from fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials into dental hard tissues. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012;23:1811-2110.1007/s10856-012-4653-z22532098
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. 40. Mount GJ. An atlas of glass-ionomer cements: a clinician’s guide. London: Martin Dunitz, 1990.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. 41. Ngo H. Glass-ionomer cements as restorative and preventive materials. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54:551-63.10.1016/j.cden.2010.04.00120630196
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. 42. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater 2016;7:16.10.3390/jfb7030016504098927367737
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. 43. Mount GJ, Patel C, Makinson OF. Resin modified glass-ionomers: strength, cure depth and translucency. Aust Dent J 2002;47:339-43.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00548.x12587771
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. 44. Hengtrakool C, Pearson GJ, Wilson M. Interaction between GIC and S. sanguis biofilms: antibacterial properties and changes of surface hardness. J Dent 2006;34:588-97.10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. 45. Mickenautsch S, Mount G, Yengopal V. Therapeutic effect of glassionomers: an overview of evidence. Aust Dent J 2011;56:10-5; quiz 103.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01304.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. 46. Pascotto RC, de Lima Navarro MF, Capelozza Filho L, Cury JA. In vivo effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:36-41.10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00571-7
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. 47. Justus R. Deproteinization of tooth enamel surfaces to prevent white spot lesions and bracket bond failure: A revolution in orthodontic bonding. APOS Trends in Orthodontics 2016;6:179-84.10.4103/2321-1407.186431
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. 48. McLean JW, Wilson AD. Glass ionomer cements. Br Dent J 2004;196:514-5.10.1038/sj.bdj.4811254
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. 49. Nicholson JW. Adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to teeth: A review. Int J of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2016;69:33.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. 50. Fjeld M, Øgaard B. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel surfaces exposed to 3 orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:575-81.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. 51. Ryf S, Flury S, Palaniappan S, Lussi A, van Meerbeek B, Zimmerli B. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:25-32.10.1093/ejo/cjq128
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. 52. Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. Am J Orthod 1980;77:269-83.10.1016/0002-9416(80)90082-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. 53. Thompson RE, Way DC. Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. Am J Orthod 1981;79:282-95.10.1016/0002-9416(81)90076-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. 54. Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 993;103:258-66.10.1016/0889-5406(93)70007-B
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. 55. Claudino D, Kuga MC, Belizário L, Pereira JR. Enamel evaluation by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets and removal of adhesive remnants. J Clin Exp Dent 2018;10:e248-51.10.4317/jced.54553592388529721226
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. 56. Cochrane NJ, Lo TW, Adams GG, Schneider PM. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:312-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.01.02028863911
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. 57. Tüfekçi E, Merrill TE, Pintado MR, Beyer JP, Brantley WA. Enamel loss associated with orthodontic adhesive removal on teeth with white spot lesions: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:733-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.07.00915179398
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. 58. Ireland A, Hosein I, Sherriff M. Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:413-9.10.1093/ejo/cji03116043478
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. 59. Al Shamsi AH, Cunningham JL, Lamey PJ, Lynch E. Threedimensional measurement of residual adhesive and enamel loss on teeth after debonding of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:301.e9-15.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.02617346580
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-039 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 110 - 118
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2018
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2019
Published on: Jul 20, 2021
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Basic medical science,
Basic medical science, other

© 2021 Andrew Savundra, John Fricker, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 35 (2019): Issue 2 (January 2019)Next article