Developmental stage specific ANB reference values based on a longitudinal sample of untreated Caucasian subjects
By:
References
- 1. Downs WB. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1952;38:162-82.10.1016/0002-9416(52)90106-1
- 2. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953;39:729-55.10.1016/0002-9416(53)90082-7
- 3. Tweed CH. The frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954;24:121-69.
- 4. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1952;22:142-5.
- 5. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod 2002;72:316-23.
- 6.Casko JS, Shepherd WB. Dental and skeletal variation within range of normal. Angle Orthod 1984;54:5-17.
- 7. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby Elsevier, 2007.
- 8. Lux CJ, Burden D, Conradt C, Komposch G. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:568-78.10.1093/ejo/cji061
- 9. Huang WJ, Taylor RW, Dasanayake AP. Determining cephalometric norms for Caucasian and African Americans in Birmingham. Angle Orthod 1998;68:503-11.
- 10. Hurmerinta K, Rahkamo A, Haavikko K. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:221-7.10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00204.x
- 11. Tiwari R, Shyagali TR, Gupta A, Joshi R, Tiwari A, Sen P. Predictability and reliability of different anterio-posterior skeletal discrepancy indicators in different age groups - A cephalometric study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZC80-4.10.7860/JCDR/2016/19195.8560
- 12. Walker GF, Kowalski CJ. The distribution of the ANB angle in “normal” individuals. Angle Orthod 1971;41:332-5.
- 13. Stahl F, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:125-37. doi: 10.1016/j. ajodo.2006.06.028.
- 14. Bishara SE. Class II malocclusions: diagnostic and clinical considerations with and without treatment. Semin Orthod 2006;12:11-24.10.1053/j.sodo.2005.10.005
- 15. Ochoa BK, Nanda RS. Comparison of maxillary and mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:148-59.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.03.008
- 16. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009;41:1149-60.10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- 17. Lamparski DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod 1975;67:458-9.10.1016/0002-9416(75)90038-X
- 18. Jacobson A. The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod 1975;67:125-38.10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-2
Language: English
Page range: 69 - 74
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2019
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2020
Published on: Jul 20, 2021
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Related subjects:
© 2021 Margaret Hostage, Mathew T. Silver, Stephanie C. Finn, Benjamin Canary, Alpdogan Kantarci, Veerasathpurush Allareddy, Negin Katebi, Mohamed I. Masoud, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.