Have a personal or library account? Click to login
NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RESPONSE OF PILE-RAFT SYSTEMS CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION OF CEMENT AND POLYPROPYLENE FIBER TREATMENT Cover

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RESPONSE OF PILE-RAFT SYSTEMS CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION OF CEMENT AND POLYPROPYLENE FIBER TREATMENT

By: Ali HASANZADEH  
Open Access
|Oct 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Stabilized soil blocks division
Stabilized soil blocks division

Figure 2.

Typical 3D FE mesh of the one-quarter model
Typical 3D FE mesh of the one-quarter model

Figure 3.

Soil, pile-raft material properties and load configuration for validation [30]
Soil, pile-raft material properties and load configuration for validation [30]

Figure 4.

Comparison of the load-settlement curves from different analysis methods
Comparison of the load-settlement curves from different analysis methods

Figure 5.

The variation of maximum settlement of pile-raft with the width of reinforced block
The variation of maximum settlement of pile-raft with the width of reinforced block

Figure 6.

The variation of maximum settlement of pile-raft with the width of stabilized block
The variation of maximum settlement of pile-raft with the width of stabilized block

Figure 7.

The variation of maximum settlement of pile-raft with the depth of reinforced block
The variation of maximum settlement of pile-raft with the depth of reinforced block

Figure 8.

The effect of pile spacing on the differential settlement (between the corner and center of raft) of pile-raft system
The effect of pile spacing on the differential settlement (between the corner and center of raft) of pile-raft system

Figure 9.

The effect of the number of piles on the maximum bending moment of the foundation for various amounts of cement content
The effect of the number of piles on the maximum bending moment of the foundation for various amounts of cement content

Figure 10.

The influence of pile length and reinforced soil block dimensions on the resulting maximum bending moment at the center of raft surface
The influence of pile length and reinforced soil block dimensions on the resulting maximum bending moment at the center of raft surface

Figure 11.

The variation of pile-raft maximum settlement with cement content for various pile lengths and block sizes
The variation of pile-raft maximum settlement with cement content for various pile lengths and block sizes

Figure 12.

The relationship between the (a) maximum (b) differential settlement (between the corner and center of the raft) of pile-raft and fiber content
The relationship between the (a) maximum (b) differential settlement (between the corner and center of the raft) of pile-raft and fiber content

Figure 13.

The combined effect of adding fibers and cement on the maximum and differential settlement (between the corner and center of the raft) of the foundation for (a) 5% cement and (b) 8% cement
The combined effect of adding fibers and cement on the maximum and differential settlement (between the corner and center of the raft) of the foundation for (a) 5% cement and (b) 8% cement

Material properties of different cases considered in this study [18]

Sample no.Cement content (%)Fiber content (%)Modulus of elasticity E (MPa)Poisson’s ratioUnit weight (kN/m3)Cohesion c (kPa)Angle of internal friction ϕ (degrees)
1005.80.216.775.127.3
200.055.60.216.795.328.2
300.155.50.216.7102.530.1
400.255.30.216.7114.331.6
55039.50.316.7152.134.2
68050.70.316.7171.835.3
750.0539.20.316.7169.435.1
850.1538.80.316.7186.736.3
950.2538.50.316.7193.436.7
1080.0550.40.316.7181.437.0
1180.1549.90.316.7193.337.5
1280.2549.30.316.7229.839.3

Comparison of the settlement from centrifuge test [33] and present study

ModelAverage settlement (mm)Load taken by piles (%)
Horikoshi and Randolph [33]2219
Present study2120

Index and strength parameters of PP-fiber [18]

Behavior parametersValues
Fiber typeSingle fiber
Unit weight0.91 g/cm3
Average diameter0.034 mm
Average length12 mm
Breaking tensile strength350 MPa
Modulus of elasticity3500 MPa
Fusion point165°C
Burning point590°C
Acid and alkali resistanceVery good
DispersibilityExcellent

Material properties of Nanjing soil [18]

Soil propertiesValues
USCS ClassificationCL
Specific gravity2.7
Liquid limit36.4%
Plasticity index17.8%
Optimum moisture content16.5%
Maximum dry density1.7 g/cm3
D60 0.0117 mm
D30 0.0048 mm
D10 0.0011 mm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2019-038 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 81 - 92
Submitted on: Feb 20, 2018
|
Accepted on: May 22, 2019
|
Published on: Oct 18, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Ali HASANZADEH, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.