Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Health and Safety Perception of Construction Workers in Saudi Arabia

Open Access
|Apr 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Percentile scores for organizational safety climate components
Percentile scores for organizational safety climate components

Figure 2.

Percentile scores for safety support climate components
Percentile scores for safety support climate components

Figure 3.

Percentile scores for safety support activities components
Percentile scores for safety support activities components

Figure 4.

Percentile scores for management involvement components
Percentile scores for management involvement components

Figure 5.

Percentile scores for employees and supervisors participation
Percentile scores for employees and supervisors participation

Figure 6.

Percentile scores by program category
Percentile scores by program category

Safety support activities

ComponentsLevel of AgreementPercentile Score (%)Rate of Performance
SAANDSD
1.Management has provided adequate staff to manage and support its safety program.52114246082High
2.Awards and recognition programs used in this company are not good for promoting safe employee behavior.29333993259Above Average
3.Job performance standards are higher for production than for safety.27416860064Above Average
4.My supervisor understands the job safety problems I face.61106209082High
5.Employees are familiar with and follow regular lockout/tag out procedures.38806511274Above Average
6.Safety training is part of every new employee’s orientation.8093164385High
7.I believe management is sincere in its efforts to ensure employee safety.8078352184High
8.My supervisor seldom acts on employee safety suggestions.105532113485High
9.Emergency response procedures are almost never tested to ensure that they are working.332545751858Above Average
10.The work of the employee and management safety committee improves safety conditions.6989288282High

Safety support climate

ComponentsLevel of AgreementPercentile Score (%)Rate of Performance
SAANDSD
1.I can protect myself and coworkers through my actions while on the job.65105178183High
2.My supervisor’s behavior often goes against safe job procedures.8662887758Above Average
3.Designated employees are well trained in emergency practices, including evacuation.431191713479High
4.Management has published a written policy that expresses their attitude about employee safety.8378249284High
5.Near miss accidents/incidents are thoroughly investigated.69684513179High
6.Employee morale is poor.322131694353Above Average
7.Management does no more than the law requires to keep employees safe.157756331564Above Average
8.I understand the safety and health regulations relating to my job.106621612087High
9.My supervisor enforces safe job procedures.9870216186High
10.Standardized precautions are used by employees who deal with hazardous materials.55882231077High

Management involvement

ComponentsLevel of AgreementPercentile Score (%)Rate of Performance
SAANDSD
1.Management sets a positive safety example through their words and actions.6492289381High
2.My supervisor has successfully fit safety into the production process.106522413185High
3.The system of preventive maintenance for facilities, tools, and machinery operates poorly.18613878162Above Average
4.Management regularly participates in safety program activities.71862215281High
5.The safety coordinator has high status in this organization.74683816080High
6.Hazards that are not fixed right away by supervisors are often ignored.93577334253Above Average
7.Employees take part when accident or incident investigations occur.27606338866Above Average
8.The training provided by my supervisor helps me to do my job safely.3810525181075Above Average
9.Medical facilities are sufficient for treating the injuries that occur.5410116141178High
10.It is well known that management ignores a person’s safety performance when determining raises and promotions.75703316280High

Organizational safety climate

ComponentsLevel of AgreementPercentile Score (%)Rate of Performance
SAANDSD
1.It is common for employees to take part in identifying and eliminating worksite hazards.879685087High
2.There are frequent contact and communication between employees and management.8546577181High
3.Safety takes a back seat to production.24482298459Above Average
4.Employees often get involved in developing or revising worksite safety and health practices.6986328182High
5.My supervisor maintains a high standard of job safety performance.84633513182High
6.Detailed inspections of the facilities are made at regular, frequent intervals.60101267281High
7.Management’s views on the importance of safety are seldom stressed in employee communications.31448534267Above Average
8.Safety meetings are held less often than they should be.42962825575Above Average
9.Good teamwork exists among departments.8291193186High
10.Management shows that it cares about employee safety.96652111384High

Employees and supervisors participation

ComponentsLevel of AgreementPercentile Score (%)Rate of Performance
SAANDSD
1.The safety coordinator is readily available to provide advice and assistance.63962411281High
2.This organization has a stable workforce.9552349683High
3.Employees are afraid to report safety problems to their supervisors.273666501761Above Average
4.My supervisor always investigates lost workday cases.421141524178High
5.Ventilation, lighting, noise, and other environmental conditions are kept at a good level.55884111179High
6.Many employees do not use the PPE necessary to do their jobs safely.94821744450Above Average
7.There are job stress problems from my coworkers.196960371165Above Average
8.Management insists that supervisors think about safety when doing their jobs.101602011485High
9.Management annually sets safety goals for which all employees are held accountable.55883019477High
10.Employees rarely takepart in the development of safety requirements for their jobs.69744112080High
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2018-043 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 107 - 118
Submitted on: Sep 27, 2017
Accepted on: Mar 22, 2018
Published on: Apr 4, 2019
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2019 Muizz O. SANNI-ANIBIRE, Abubakar S. MAHMOUD, Mohammad A. HASSANAIN, Faleh ALMUTAIRI, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.