Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Determination of Mechanical Properties of Methyl Methacrylate Adhesive (MMA)

Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment
Volume 11 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

The geometry of specimens according to [18]
The geometry of specimens according to [18]

Figure 2.

Test set-up – determination of tensile strength and stiffness
Test set-up – determination of tensile strength and stiffness

Figure 3.

Test set-up – determination of Poisson’s ratio
Test set-up – determination of Poisson’s ratio

Figure 4.

Characteristic points on the narrow part of the specimen
Characteristic points on the narrow part of the specimen

Figure 5.

Characteristic points of the material model
Characteristic points of the material model

Figure 6.

A numerical model with boundary conditions [18]
A numerical model with boundary conditions [18]

Figure 7.

Stress-strain relationships for all samples
Stress-strain relationships for all samples

Figure 8.

Variation of Poisson's ratio with longitudinal strain
Variation of Poisson's ratio with longitudinal strain

Figure 9.

Base lengths for calculation of strains
Base lengths for calculation of strains

Figure 10.

Distribution of longitudinal engineer stress at the beginning of plasticization process
Distribution of longitudinal engineer stress at the beginning of plasticization process

Figure 11.

Longitudinal deformation distribution at the beginning of plasticization process
Longitudinal deformation distribution at the beginning of plasticization process

Figure 12.

Comparison of stress-strain plots obtained from numerical analyses and experiments
Comparison of stress-strain plots obtained from numerical analyses and experiments

Summary of material parameters of the analyzed adhesive

Speed of testing mm/minNo.Tensile strength, σp MPaStrain related to tensile strength, εp %Strain at failure, εf %Modulus of elasticity, E MPaPoisson’s ratio, μ
Technical Data Sheet [19]
Unknown 18.6÷20.7-30÷50517÷6890.41
Current tests data
11----0.363
2----0.344
3----0.387
415.243.905.711125-
515.064.6910.011077-
613.513.739.50938-
714.854.0710.361074-
814.854.156.171075-
Average14.704.118.3510580.365
Stand. Deviation0.610.321.9962.90.018
Coeff. of variation4.15%7.79%23.83%5.95%4.93%
10916.583.259.831141-
1016.663.115.791137-
1116.643.225.351161-
1215.423.084.801128-
1315.733.378.281090-
Average16.213.216.811131-
Stand. Deviation0.530.101.9223.3-
Coeff. of variation3.27%3.12%28.19%2.06%-

Material parameters used in numerical analyses

Speed of testing mm/minσe MPaεe %σp MPaεp %εf %
18.000.8314.653.808.30
1011.001.1516.203.107.10
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2018-041 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 96
Submitted on: Dec 15, 2017
Accepted on: Apr 15, 2018
Published on: Apr 4, 2019
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Methacrylate,
MMA,
Mechanical properties,
Influence of test speed
Related subjects:
Architecture and design,
Architecture,
Architects, buildings

© 2019 Marcin KOZŁOWSKI, Arkadiusz BULA, Jacek HULIMKA, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 11 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)Next article