Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Non-Metallic Reinforcements with Different Moduli of Elasticity and Surfaces for Concrete Structures Cover

Non-Metallic Reinforcements with Different Moduli of Elasticity and Surfaces for Concrete Structures

Open Access
|Apr 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Mechanical characteristics of concrete mixes (MPa)

SymbolCompressive str.Splitting tensile str.
Avg.St.D.Avg.St.D.
C139.141.262.910.36
C248.801.103.400.33
C354.211.503.720.19
S167.163.574.130.08
Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the pull-out specimen

Figure 2.

Left: CFRP and GFRP sand coated bars prepared with 5Ø (Ø – bar diameter) embedment length. Right: pull-out test setup

Table 2.

Pull-out test results, CFRP sand coated #3 (9.52 mm diameter) bars

SymbolBond strengthLoaded end slipFree end slipBond stiffness
τb,max Avg.St.D.C.O.V.Slip a Avg.St.D.C.O.V.Slip a Avg.St.D.C.O.V.Avg.
(MPa)(MPa)(MPa)(%)(mm)(mm)(mm)(%)(mm)(mm)(mm)(%)(N/mm3)
C1119.8219.311.276.50.2610.2340.03414.50.1300.1000.03838.282.61
220.250.1960.112
317.860.2450.057
C2114.3015.571.549.90.1630.2590.12548.10.0380.0510.01122.560.18
217.290.2130.054
315.140.4000.060
C3112.6015.954.7429.70.2910.2450.06526.50.0670.0650.0045.565.15
219.300.1990.062
S1116.4716.300.976.00.3580.2600.09536.40.0360.0380.0025.462.58
215.250.2540.039
317.180.1690.040

1 Notes:

2a Slip corresponding to bond strength

Table 3.

Pull-out test results, GFRP sand coated #3 (9.52 mm diameter) bars

SymbolBond strengthLoaded end slipFree end slipBond stiffness
τb,maxAvg.St.D.C.O.V.Slip a Avg.St.D.C.O.V.Slip a Avg.St.D.C.O.V.Avg.
(MPa)(MPa)(MPa)(%)(mm)(mm)(mm)(%)(mm)(mm)(mm)(%)(N/mm3)
C1112.8714.114.2630.20.3970.4060.15638.30.0380.0750.05269.534.76
218.850.5660.134
310.600.2550.052
C219.549.160.748.10.2550.2560.06927.00.0400.0260.01248.035.74
28.300.1880.022
39.630.3260.016
C318.2113.036.8252.30.2380.3740.19251.40.0340.0540.02852.434.87
217.860.5090.074
S119.2410.972.4422.30.2970.2970.0010.20.0440.0570.01832.336.98
212.700.2960.070

3 Notes:

4a Slip corresponding to bond strength

Table 5.

Pull-out test results for Series 2

SymbolBond strengthLoaded end slipFree end slipBond stiffness
τb,max Avg.St.D.C.O.V.Slip a Avg.St.D.C.O.V.Slip a Avg.St.D.C.O.V.Avg.
(MPa)(MPa)(MPa)(%)(mm)(mm)(mm)(%)(mm)(mm)(mm)(%)(N/mm3)
Sand coated123.2423.010.572.50.7180.6380.08813.70.2660.2470.0249.836.05
222.360.5450.256
323.430.6520.220
Indented type120.0218.911.176.20.5810.6060.14824.40.3170.3190.06821.331.19
217.690.4730.252
319.030.7650.388
Indented type 2111.2112.251.2910.51.1381.1980.1038.60.9570.9170.0697.510.23
211.841.1380.957
313.691.3160.838

5 Notes:

6a Slip corresponding to bond strength

Figure 3.

Effect of modulus of elasticity of FRP bars on bond strength in concrete

Table 4.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) between bond strength results of CFRP and GFRP bars

Concrete mixSignificance level (%)
C111.2
C23.9
C329.7
S18.3
Figure 4.

Bond stress-slip relationships of GFRP bars with different surface profiles

Figure 5.

Effect of surface profile of GFRP bars on bond strength. Eccentricity (left) and centric (right) pull-out test

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2018-025 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 (formerly 1899-0142) | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 88
Submitted on: Jun 25, 2017
Accepted on: Mar 16, 2018
Published on: Apr 4, 2019
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Sandor SOLYOM, Matteo DI BENEDETTI, Anna SZIJÁRTÓ, György L. BALÁZS, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.