Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Application of Pressure-Driven Membrane Processes in Treatment of Swimming Pool Water System

Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment
Volume 11 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Hydraulic performance of the MW and V5 ultrafiltration membranes (ΔP=0.5 MPa) during filtration of washings from SP and RP swimming pool systems
Hydraulic performance of the MW and V5 ultrafiltration membranes (ΔP=0.5 MPa) during filtration of washings from SP and RP swimming pool systems

Figure 2.

Hydraulic performance of the V5 ultrafiltration membrane at ΔP = 0.2 and 0.5 MPa during filtration of washings from the JB system
Hydraulic performance of the V5 ultrafiltration membrane at ΔP = 0.2 and 0.5 MPa during filtration of washings from the JB system

Figure 3.

Hydraulic performance of nanofiltration membranes (DK and HL) at ΔP=3 MPa for washings from the SP and RP systems
Hydraulic performance of nanofiltration membranes (DK and HL) at ΔP=3 MPa for washings from the SP and RP systems

Figure 4.

Separation properties of ultrafiltration membranes MW and V5 (ΔP=0.5 MPa) in relation to reduction of a) absorbance RUV254 b) turbidity Rturbidity of washings from the SP and RP systems
Separation properties of ultrafiltration membranes MW and V5 (ΔP=0.5 MPa) in relation to reduction of a) absorbance RUV254 b) turbidity Rturbidity of washings from the SP and RP systems

Figure 5.

Separation properties of the V5 membrane at different transmembrane pressure values (0.2 MPa and 0.5 MPa) defined by the values of the average retention coefficients a) absorbance RUV254 and b) turbidity Rturbidity of washings from the JB system
Separation properties of the V5 membrane at different transmembrane pressure values (0.2 MPa and 0.5 MPa) defined by the values of the average retention coefficients a) absorbance RUV254 and b) turbidity Rturbidity of washings from the JB system

Figure 6.

Separation properties of nanofiltration membranes (DK and HL) defined by the retention average ratio for a) absorbance RUV254 b) turbidity Rturbidity of the washings from the SP and RP systems
Separation properties of nanofiltration membranes (DK and HL) defined by the retention average ratio for a) absorbance RUV254 b) turbidity Rturbidity of the washings from the SP and RP systems

Figure 7.

Changes in the value of inhibition of bioluminescence of samples of washings before and after a) ultrafiltration for the V5 and MW membranes (ΔP=0.5 MPa) and b) nanofiltration for the HL and DK membranes (ΔP=3 MPa)
Changes in the value of inhibition of bioluminescence of samples of washings before and after a) ultrafiltration for the V5 and MW membranes (ΔP=0.5 MPa) and b) nanofiltration for the HL and DK membranes (ΔP=3 MPa)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2018-014 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 141 - 148
Submitted on: Aug 28, 2017
Accepted on: Oct 13, 2017
Published on: Apr 1, 2019
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Swimming pools waters,
Washings,
Ultrafiltration,
Nanofiltration
Related subjects:
Architecture and design,
Architecture,
Architects, buildings

© 2019 Edyta ŁASKAWIEC, Mariusz DUDZIAK, Joanna WYCZARSKA-KOKOT, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 11 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)Next article