Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Stiffness Module and Compression Strength of Polymer-Treated Sand

By:
Open Access
|Apr 2019

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Grain Size Distribution of Sand
Grain Size Distribution of Sand

Figure 2.

The cylindrical specimens a) sand mixed with each of 10%, 20%, 30% of cement b) sand mixed with 50% of cement
The cylindrical specimens a) sand mixed with each of 10%, 20%, 30% of cement b) sand mixed with 50% of cement

Figure 3.

The prism specimen (sand + epoxy) a) in the wooden mold b) after extrusion
The prism specimen (sand + epoxy) a) in the wooden mold b) after extrusion

Figure 4.

c) cylindrical specimen connected to software d) flexural frequency for prism specimen with 3% epoxy
c) cylindrical specimen connected to software d) flexural frequency for prism specimen with 3% epoxy

Figure 5.

Young Modulus (E) vs the aspect ratio for treated cylindrical specimens with additives from 1% up to 5%
Young Modulus (E) vs the aspect ratio for treated cylindrical specimens with additives from 1% up to 5%

Figure 6.

Young Modulus (E) vs the additives percentage for all sizes of cylindrical specimens
Young Modulus (E) vs the additives percentage for all sizes of cylindrical specimens

Figure 7.

Poisson ratio vs the aspect ratio for treated cylindrical specimens with additives from 1% up to 5%
Poisson ratio vs the aspect ratio for treated cylindrical specimens with additives from 1% up to 5%

Figure 8.

Poisson ratio vs the additives percentage for all sizes of cylindrical specimens
Poisson ratio vs the additives percentage for all sizes of cylindrical specimens

Figure 9.

Young modulus (E) & Poisson ratio vs the additives percentage for cylindrical specimens a) aspect ratio 0.4, b) aspect ratio 0.48, c) aspect ratio 0.6
Young modulus (E) & Poisson ratio vs the additives percentage for cylindrical specimens a) aspect ratio 0.4, b) aspect ratio 0.48, c) aspect ratio 0.6

Figure 10.

Strength (MPa) of cylindrical specimens versus the additives’ percentage
Strength (MPa) of cylindrical specimens versus the additives’ percentage

Figure 11.

Maximum load (N) vs the aspect ratio for treated specimens with additives from 1% up to 5%
Maximum load (N) vs the aspect ratio for treated specimens with additives from 1% up to 5%

Figure 12.

Strength (MPa) of cylindrical specimens vs the aspect ratio
Strength (MPa) of cylindrical specimens vs the aspect ratio

Properties of epoxy

PropertyComponent AComponent BComponent A+B (A:B is 2:1)
Density 11.7kN/m3 10kN/m3 11.4 kN/m3
Viscosity at 25°C ca. 600 mPa.s (milli Pascal. second)ca. 400 mPa.s (milli Pascal. second)ca. 550 mPa.s (milli Pascal. second)
Compression Strength 100 MPa
Temperature Resistance Max 50 °C
E-modulus 300 MPa
Hardness shore A 95

Dimensions of specimens

Specimen No.1(small)2(medium)3(large)
Cylindrical
Height of specimen (L) mm7086105
Diameter of specimen(D)mm424242
Aspect ratio D/L0.60.4880.4
Prism12
Length of Specimen mm150.27150.71
Width of specimen mm101.39113.12
Thickness of specimen mm11.8212.01

Poisson ratio for cylindrical treated specimens

Additive’s PercentageAspect Ratio of Cylindrical SpecimensPoisson Ratio (proposal)Poisson Ratio (calculated)
1%0.60.30.301343101
0.480.290.292045291
0.40.290.291639096
2%0.60.260.259105869
0.480.240.241980416
0.40.240.241586634
3%0.60.220.221253169
0.480.20.20559029
0.40.180.181458296
4%0.60.1650.162515082
0.480.160.162010583
0.40.170.170111179
5%0.60.150.150715709
0.480.140.142043808
0.40.140.140292754
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2018-010 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 104
Submitted on: Jun 15, 2017
Accepted on: Feb 19, 2018
Published on: Apr 1, 2019
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Maiasa MLHEM, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.