Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Preventing Irregularity Effects of Infills Through Modifying Architectural Drawings

Open Access
|Aug 2018

References

  1. Kaushik H.B., Rai D.C., Jain S.K.; Code Approaches to Seismic Design of Masonry -Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frames: A State-of-the-Art Review. Earthquake Spectra, Vol.22, No.4, 2006; p.961-98310.1193/1.2360907
  2. Mondal G., Jain S.K.; Lateral stiffness of masonry infilled reinforced concrete (RC) frames with central opening. Earthquake Spectra, Vol.24, No.3, 2008; p.701-72310.1193/1.2942376
  3. Tsai M., Huang T.; Effect of Interior Brick-infill Partitions on the Progressive Collapse Potential of a RC Building: Linear Static Analysis Results. Engineering and Technology, No.50; 2009; p.883-889
  4. Rodrigues H., Humberto V., Aníbal C.; Simplified Macro-Model for Infill Masonry Panel. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, No.14, 2010; p.390-41610.1080/13632460903086044
  5. Pradhan P.M., Pradhan P.L., Maskey R.K.; A Review on Partial Infilled Frames under Lateral Loads. Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol.8, No.1, 2012; p.142-15210.3126/kuset.v8i1.6054
  6. Noorifard A., Tabeshpour M. R., Vafamehr M., Mehdizadeh Saraj F.; Effective Measures in Design Process of Conventional Medium-Rise Buildings to Prevent Detrimental Seismic Effects of Walls. 2nd Seminar on Structural Investigation of Non-Structural Elements, Tehran, Iran, 2014 (in Farsi)
  7. Noorifard A., Tabeshpour M. R., Mehdizadeh Saraj F.; Effect of Infills on Torsion and Soft Storey in a Conventional Residential Building in Tehran-Iran. 7th International Conference on Seismology & Earthquake Engineering (SEE 7), Tehran, Iran, 2015
  8. Mostafaei H., Kabeyasawa T.; Effect of Infill Masonry Walls on the Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Subjected to the 2003 Bam Earthquake Strong Motion: A Case Study of Bam Telephone Center. Bull. Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, No.79, 2004; p.133-156
  9. Erman E.; A Critical Analysis of EarthquakeResistant Architectural Provisions. Architectural Science Review, Vol.48, No.4, 2005; p.295-30410.3763/asre.2005.4837
  10. Bachmann H.; Seismic Conceptual Design of Buildings – Basic principles for engineers, architects, building owners, and authorities. Office fédéral de l’environnement, SDC, 2003
  11. Tabeshpour M.R.; Masonry Infill Walls in Structural Frames. Fadak Issatis Publisher, Tehran, 2009 (in Farsi)
  12. Mahdi T., Khorami Azar M., Khalili Jahromi K.; Partition Walls Types and Structural Design Issues; Research Report No R-569. Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, 2010 (in Farsi)
  13. Tabeshpour M. R., Azad A., Golafshani A. A.; Seismic Behavior and Retrofit of Infilled Frames. Earthquake-Resistant Structures – Design, Assessment and Rehabilitation, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/earthquake-resis-tantstructures-design-assessment-and-rehabilitation, 2012
  14. Dubey S. K., Sangamnerkar P. D.; Seismic Behaviour of Assymetric RC Buildings, IJAET, Vol.2, No.4, 2011; p.296-301
  15. Moghadam H., Mohammadi M. Gh., Jahromi K. Kh.; Behavior of Single and Multilayer Infill Steel Frame Research Report No. R-555. Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, 2010 (in Farsi)
  16. Charleson A.W.; Seismic Design for Architects Outwitting the Quake. Translated by Golabchi M., Sorooshnia E., 2nd Edition, University of Tehran Press, Tehran, 2011(in Farsi)
  17. Aliaari M., Memari, A.M.; Analysis of Masonry Infilled Steel Frames with Seismic Isolator Subframes. Engineering Structures, No.27, 2005; p.487-50010.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.008
  18. Key D.; Civil Engineering Design – Earthquake Design Practice for Buildings. Thomas Telford, London, 1988
  19. Vicente R. S., Rodrigues H., Varum H., Costa A., da Silva J. A. R. M.; Performance of masonry enclosure walls: lessons learned from recent earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol.11, No.1, 2012; p.23-3410.1007/s11803-012-0095-3
  20. Özmen C., Ünay A.; Commonly encountered seismic design faults due to the architectural design of residential buildings in Turkey. Building and Environment, No.42, 2007; p.1406-141610.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.029
  21. Asteris P.G.; Lateral Stiffness of Brick Masonry Infilled Plane Frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, No.129, 2003; p.1071-107910.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1071)
  22. Zhao B., Taucer F., Rossetto T.; Field Investigation on the Performance of Building Structures during the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake in China. Engineering Structures, Vol.31, No.8, 2009; p.1707-1723 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.039
  23. Arnold Ch.; Seismic Issues in Architectural Design. FEMA 454: Designing for Earthquakes, A manual for Architects, 2003
  24. Mulgund G.V., Kulkarni A.B.; Seismic Assessment of RC Frame Buildings with Brick masonry Infills. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Sciences and Technologies, Vol.2, No.2, 2011; p.140-147
  25. Yatağan S.; Damages and Failures Observed in Infill Walls of Reinforced Concrete Frame after 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake, ITU A|Z, Vol.8, No.1, 2011; p.219-228
  26. Uva G., Porco F., Fiore, A.; Appraisal of masonry infill walls effect in the seismic response of RC framed buildings: a case study. Engineering Structures, No.34, 2012; p.514-52610.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.043
  27. Tabeshpour M.R.; Infilled Frames. Fadak Issatis Publisher, Tehran, 2013 (in Farsi)
  28. Shahnazari M. R.; Study of steel infilled frames behaviour under lateral load in roof level. Doctor of Philosophy in civil engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran, 1998 (in Farsi)
  29. NZSEE (New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering); Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Buildings in Earthquakes. Recommendations of a NZSEE Study Group on Earthquake Risk Buildings, Wellington, New Zealand, 2006
  30. Standard No 2800; Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, 4th Edition. Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran, 2015 (in Farsi)
  31. NBC 201(Nepal National Building code); Mandatory Rules of Thumb Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Masonry Infill. Babar Mahal, Kathmandu, Ministry of Physical Planning and Works, Nepal, 1994
  32. NBC 105 (Nepal National Building code); Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal. Babar Mahal, Kathmandu, Ministry of Physical Planning and Works, Nepal, 1994
  33. ASCE 7-10; Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, United States, 2010
  34. IS 1893 (Indian Standard); Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings, Fifth Revision. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, 2002
  35. Specification for Structures to be Built in Earthquake Areas; Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. Government of the Republic of Turkey, 2007
  36. NZS 1170.5:2004; Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake actions – New Zealand. Published by Standards New Zealand, New Zealand, 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2016-024 | Journal eISSN: 2720-6947 | Journal ISSN: 1899-0142
Language: English
Page range: 77 - 92
Submitted on: Dec 21, 2015
Accepted on: Apr 29, 2016
Published on: Aug 26, 2018
Published by: Silesian University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Azadeh NOORIFARD, Mohammad Reza TABESHPOUR, Fatemeh Mehdizadeh SARADJ, published by Silesian University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.