References
- 1. Amsterdam Call for Action on Open Science (2016). Information from the Government of The Netherlands. Available at: [Link]
- 2. Baack, S. (2015). Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 205395171559463. [ [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.1177/2053951715594634
- 3. Bartling S., Friesike S. (2014). Towards Another Scientific Revolution. Opening Science. Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_1
- 4. Björk, B.-C. (2017). Scholarly journal publishing in transition- from restricted to open access. Electronic Markets, 27(2), 101-109. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.1007/s12525-017-0249-2
- 5. Burgelman, J.-C., Pascu, C., Szkuta, K., Von Schomberg, R., Karalopoulos, A., Repanas, K., & Schouppe, M. (2019). Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century. Frontiers in Big Data, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.3389/fdata.2019.00043
- 6. Cai, L., & Zhu, Y. (2015). The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. Data Science Journal, 14, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.5334/dsj-2015-002
- 7. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Manghi, P., & Tani, A. (2015). Data journals: A survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1747-1762. [CrossRef]10.1002/asi.23358
- 8. CERN (n.d.). The birth of the Web. Available at:https://home.cern/science/computing/birth-web [Link]
- 9. Class, B., de Bruyne, M., Wuillemin, C., Donzé, D., & Claivaz, J.-B. (2021). Towards Open Science for the Qualitative Researcher: From a Positivist to an Open Interpretation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110346. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.1177/16094069211034641
- 10. De Smedt, K., Koureas, D., & Wittenburg, P. (2020). FAIR Digital Objects for Science: From Data Pieces to Actionable Knowledge Units. Publications, 8(2), 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.3390/publications8020021
- 11. Easterbrook, S.M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779-781. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.1038/ngeo2283
- 12. Fecher B., Friesike S. (2014) Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. In: Bartling S., Friesike S. (eds) Opening Science. Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.2139/ssrn.2272036
- 13. Friesike, S., Widenmayer, B., Gassmann, O., & Schildhauer, T. (2014). Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(4), 581-601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10961-014-9375-6
- 14. Hajduk, G.K., Jamieson, N.E., Baker, B.L., Olesen, O.F., & Lang, T. (2019). It is not enough that we require data to be shared; we have to make sharing easy, feasible and accessible too! BMJ Global Health, 4(4), Article e001550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001550
- 15. Hauschke, C., Nazarovets, S., Altemeier, F., & Kaliuzhna, N. (2021). Roadmap to FAIR Research Information in Open Infrastructures. Journal of Library Metadata, 21(1-2), 45-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1080/19386389.2021.1999156
- 16. Hey, T. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science. Science, 308(5723), 817-821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 17. Hey, T., & Payne, M.C. (2015). Open science decoded. Nature Physics, 11(5), 367-369. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.1038/nphys3313
- 18. Horizon Europe (HORIZON): Programme Guide. (2021). European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/programme-guide_horizon_en.pdf [Link]
- 19. Jamali, D., Barkemeyer, R., Leigh, J., & Samara, G. (2020). Open Access, Open Science, and Coronavirus: Mega trends with historical proportions. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(3), 419-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1111/beer.12289
- 20. Kattge, J., Díaz, S., & Wirth, C. (2014). Of carrots and sticks. Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 778-779. [CrossRef]10.1038/ngeo2280
- 21. Koltay, T. (2020). Quality of Open Research Data: Values, Convergences and Governance. Information, 11(4), 175. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.3390/info11040175
- 22. Kovalchuk, A., Khanzhyn, V., & Kudlatskyi, Ya. (2018). Ekonomichnyi potentsial vidkrytykh danykh v Ukraini. [Economic potential of the open data in Ukraine] TAPAS. Available at: https://tapas.org.ua/media/economic-potential-of-open-data-for-ukraine/ [Link]
- 23. Matyushenko, I.Y., Khaustova, V.Y., & Kniaziev, S.I. (2017). Institutional Support of Innovative R&D in the Formation of Single Research Area in the EU and Ukraine. Science and innovation, 13(2), 5-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.15407/scine13.02.005
- 24. McKiernan, E.C., Bourne, P.E., Brown, C.T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., McDougall, D., Nosek, B.A., Ram, K., Soderberg, C.K., Spies, J.R., Thaney, K., Updegrove, A., Woo, K.H., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.7554/eLife.16800.008
- 25. Ministry of economic development and trade of Ukraine. (2017). Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine. Available at: [Link]
- 26. Mueller, S.T., & Piper, B.J. (2014). The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250-259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024
- 27. Murray-Rust P., Neylon Cameron, Pollock Rufus, Wilbanks John (2010). Panton Principles, Principles for open data in science. Available at: http://pantonprinciples.org/ [Link]
- 28. Murray-Rust, P. (2008). Open Data in Science. Nature Precedings. [CrossRef]10.1038/npre.2008.1526.1
- 29. Nosek, B.A., Ebersole, C.R., DeHaven, A.C., & Mellor, D.T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600-2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1073/pnas.1708274114
- 30. OECD (2015). Making Open Science a Reality. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 25, OECD Publishing, Paris. [CrossRef]
- 31. Open Definition (a). Defining open in open data, open content and open knowledge. Open Definition 2.1. (n.d.). The Open Knowledge Foundation. Available at: https://opendefinition.org/od/2.1/en/ [Link]
- 32. Open Definition (b). Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. (n. d.). Open Knowledge Foundation. Available at: https://opendefinition.org/od/2.1/en/ [Link]
- 33. Open innovation, open science, open to the world: a vision for Europe (2016). European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. [CrossRef]
- 34. Peirce, J., Gray, J.R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J.K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195-203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
- 35. Piwowar, H.A., & Vision, T.J. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ, 1, e175. [Google Scholar] G:\BEL\BEL\Issue 4, 2022\doi.org\10.7717\peerj.175\ [CrossRef]10.7717/peerj.175
- 36. Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, Article e4375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.7717/peerj.4375
- 37. Plan S. (2018). Part III: Technical Guidance and Requirements. Available at: https://www.coalition-s.org/technical-guidance_and_requirements/ [Link]
- 38. Pordes, R., Petravick, D., Kramer, B., Olson, D., Livny, M., Roy, A., Avery, P., Blackburn, K., Wenaus, T., Würthwein, F., Foster, I., Gardner, R., Wilde, M., Blatecky, A., McGee, J., & Quick, R. (2007). The open science grid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 78, 012057. [CrossRef]10.1088/1742-6596/78/1/012057
- 39. Price-Whelan, A.M., Sipőcz, B.M., Günther, H.M., Lim, P.L., Crawford, S.M., Conseil, S., Shupe, D. L., Craig, M.W., Dencheva, N., Ginsburg, A., VanderPlas, J.T., Bradley, L.D., Pérez-Suárez, D., de Val-Borro, M., Aldcroft, T.L., Cruz, K.L., Robitaille, T.P., Tollerud, E.J., Ardelean, C., Zabalza, V. (2018). The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. The Astronomical Journal, 156(3), 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 40. Pro naukovu i naukovo-tekhnichnu diialnist, Zakon Ukrainy № 848-VIII (2021). (Ukraine). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/848-19 [Link]
- 41. Pro vykonannia Uhody pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony, Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy № 1106 (2020) (Ukraina). Available at: [Link]
- 42. Pro zatverdzhennia dorozhnoi karty z intehratsii naukovo-innovatsiinoi systemy Ukrainy do yevropeiskoho doslidnytskoho prostoru. (2021). Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy. Available at: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/npa/pro-zatverdzhennya-dorozhnoyi-karti-z-integraciyi-naukovo-innovacijnoyi-sistemi-ukrayini-do-yevropejskogo-doslidnickogo-prostoru [Link]
- 43. Ramjoué, C. (2015). Towards Open Science: The vision of the European Commission. Information Services & Use, 35(3), 167-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.3233/ISU-150777
- 44. Scopus (n.d.). Official site. Available at: [Link]
- 45. Suber, P. (2012). What is open access? In Open access. The MIT Press. Available at:https://repo.iainbatusangkar.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/8315/1509096809528_(MIT Press Essential Knowledge) Peter Suber-Open Access-The MIT Press (2012).pdf?sequence=1 [Link]
- 46. Svystunov, S.Ya., Shevchenko, A.Yu. (2014). Stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku Ukrainskoho natsionalnoho hrid. Analiz ta lohika mozhlyvoho rozvytku. [State and prospects of the development of the Ukrainian National Grid. Analysis and logic of possible development]. Systemni doslidzhennia ta informatsiini tekhnolohii, 2, 40-52. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/sdtit_2014_2_6 [Link]
- 47. UNESDOC Digital Library (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en [Link]
- 48. Van den Eynden, V., Corti, L., Woollard, M., Bishop, L., & Horton, L. (2011). Managing and sharing data. University of Essex. Available at: https://dam.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/622417/managingsharing.pdf [Link]
- 49. Vicente-Saez, R., & Martinez-Fuentes, C. (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428-436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043
- 50. VOSViewer (n.d). Official site. Available at: [Link]
- 51. Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L.B., Bourne, P.E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A.J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C.T., Finkers, R., Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1). [ Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1038/sdata.2016.18