References
- Sieroszewski P. Nieprawidłowy czas trwania ciąży. Ciąża przeterminowana. In: Bręborowicz GH, editor. Położnictwo. Medycyna matczynopłodowa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 2012. p. 41-67.
- Pierce S, Bakker R, Myers D, Edwards RK. Clinical insights for cervical ripening and labor induction using prostaglandins. AJP Rep 2018;8(4):e307-14.
- Bakker R, Pierce S, Myers D. The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;296(2):167-79.
- Lapuente-Ocamica O, Ugarte L, Lopez-Picado A, Sanchez-Refoyo F, Lasa IL, Echevarria O, et al. Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19(1):14.
- Stephenson ML, Hawkins JS, Powers BL, Wing DA. Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a delivery system with accurate dosing and rapid discontinuation. Womens Health (Lond) 2014;10(1):29-36.
- Li Y, He Z, Song L, Zhang J, Wang J, Cheng J. Foley catheter ballon versus prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2016;9(4):7573-84.
- Bomba-Opoń D, Drews K, Huras H, Laudański P, Paszkowski T, Wielgoś M. Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego dotyczące indukcji porodu. Ginekologia Perinatologia Prakt 2017;2(2):58-71.
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, et al. Postterm pregnancy. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, et al., editors. Williams obstetrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018. p. 1-16.
- Conde A, Ben S, Tarigo J, Artucio S, Varela V, Grimaldi P, et al. Comparison between vaginal and sublingual misoprostol 50 μg for cervical ripening prior to induction of labor: randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;295(4):839-44.
- Marsdal KE, Sørbye IK, Gaudernack LC, Lukasse M. A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18(1):11.
- Dorr ML, Pierson RC, Daggy J, Quinney SK, Haas DM. Buccal versus vaginal misoprostol for term induction of labor: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Perinatol 2019;36(7):765-72.
- Morris M, Bolnga JW, Verave O, Aipit J, Rero A, Laman M. Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17(1):298.
- Bolla D, Weissleder SV, Radan AP, Gasparri ML, Raio L, Müller M, et al. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18(1);149.
- Abdel-Aal NK, Saad AS, Abdel-Haleem WY. Oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour in term prelabour rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. J Evidence Based Women’s Health 2020;10(4):291-7.
- Swarnkar KS, Chunjian Y, Rajiv D, Sohan D, Rekma D, Pandey SR. Efficacy and safety uses of misoprostol for induction of labour at term. In-tern J Sci Inventions Today 2018;7(2):211-21.
- Jasim SA, Mahdi WA, Hameed BH. Use of intravenous oxytocin infusion versus misoprostol for induction of delivery in cases of PROM at term. IJRMST 2020;10:95-100.
- Hokkila E, Kruit H, Rahkonen L, Timonen S, Mattila M, Laatio L, et al. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral miso-prostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019;98(8):1032-9.
- Wallstrom T, Jarnbert-Pettersson H, Stenson D, Akerud H, Darj E, Gemzell-Danielsson K, et al. Labor induction with orally administrated misoprostol: a retrospective cohort study. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:6840592.
- Jenkins A, Coumary SA, Ghose S. Comparison of the efficacy of extra amniotic Foley catheter, intravaginal prostaglandin E1 tablet and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for pre induction cervical ripening: a randomized comparative study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2016;5(11):3902-8.
- Pimentel VM, Arabkhazaeli M, Moon JY, Wang A, Kapedani A, Bernstein PS, et al. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218(6):614.e1-8.
- Bręborowicz GH, Dubiel M, Markwitz W, Ropacka M, Spaczyński M. Ocena stanu płodu w czasie ciąży i porodu. In: Bręborowicz GH, editor. Położnictwo. Podręcznik dla położnych i pielęgniarek. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 2011. p. 431-4.
- Janiec W, Trzeciak HI, Folwarczna J. Leki wpływające na czynność skurczową macicy w okresie porodu. In: Janiec W, editor. Kompendium farmakologii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 2015. p. 162-3.
- Helmig RB, Hvidman LE. An audit of oral administration of Angusta® (misoprostol) 25 μg for induction of labor in 976 consecutive women with a singleton pregnancy in a university hospital in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020;99(10):1396-402.
- Draycott T, van der Nelson H, Montouchet C, Ruff L, Andersson F. Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: a model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:49.
- Sharp A, Faluyi D, Alfirevic Z. Misoprostol vaginal insert (Mysodelle) versus Dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin) for induction of labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;240:41-4.
- Kehl S, Weiss C, Dammer U, Raabe E, Burghaus S, Heimrich J, et al. Induction of labour: change of method and its effects. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015;75(3):238-43.
- Young DC, Delaney T, Armson BA, Fanning C. Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2020;15(1):e0227245.
- Hauwa SU, Shittu SO, Umar-Sulayman H, Audu BM. A comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term, at the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2019;36(2):189-95.
- Górnisiewicz T, Jaworowski A, Zembala-Szczerba M, Babczyk D, Huras H. Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor induction at term pregnancies. Ginekol Pol 2017;88(6):320-4.
- Levine LD. Cervical ripening: Why we do what we do. Semin Perinatol 2020;44(2):151216.
- Levine LD, Valencia CM, Tolosa JE. Induction of labor in continuing pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020;67:90-9.
- Solone M, Shaw KA. Induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2020;32(2):107-12.
- Blanc-Petitjean P, Carbonne B, Deneux-Tharaux C, Salomé M, Goffinet F, Ray CL. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: a population-based study using coarsened exact matching. Paediatr Perinatal Epidemiol 2019;33(5):313-22.
- Sharada K, Warrier H, Reddy AK, Thulasi P. Misoprostol and Oxytocin in induction of labor. Intern Arch Integrated Med 2018;5(3):97-105.
- Bhatu JJ, Chaudhari AB, Chauhan NR. Oxytocin versus Misoprostol used as an induction of labour in term in early rupture of Amniotic membranes. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2020;9(3):1023-8.
- Ulan A, Ulan J, Wagner E, Sadowska M. Indukcja porodu. Eur J Med Technol 2015;2(7):16-9.
- Sajjad N, Ali S, Hassan S, Rasheed T. Determine the outcome of labour induction and compare the results between misoprostol and oxyto-cin in post-date pregnancy. J Med Health Studies 2020;14(1):35-7.
- Bell AF, Erickson EN, Carter CS. Beyond labor: the role of natural and synthetic oxytocin in the transition to motherhood. J Midwifery Womens Health 2014;59(1):35-42.
- Acharya T, Devkota R, Bhattarai B, Acharya R. Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour. SAGE Open Med 2017;5:2050312117700809
- Braunthal S, Brateanu A. Hypertension in pregnancy: pathophysiology and treatment. SAGE Open Med 2019;7:2050312119843700.
- Fareed P, Mahajan N, Farhana S. Comparison of the efficacy of intracervical foley’s catheter balloon with PGE2 gel in pre-induction cervical ripening. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2016;5(2):371-4.
- Schmidt M, Neophytou M, Hars O, Freudenberg J, Kühnert M. Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019;299(1):105-12.
- Kashanian M, Eshraghi N, Rahimi M, Sheikhansari N, Javanmanesh F. Efficacy comparison of titrated oral solution of misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin on labour induction in women with full-term pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2020;40(1):20-4.
- Pourali L, Saghafi N, Eslami Hasan Abadi S, Tara F, Vatanchi AM, Motamedi E. Induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes; oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol; a randomised clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;38(2):167-71.
- Nair PP, Jungari ML, Tiwari MR, Butola LK. Study of induction of labour with oral misoprostol and its maternal and perinatal outcome. Int J Cur Res Rev 2020;12(14):77-81.