Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Importance of Community in Fostering Change: A Qualitative Case Study of the Rigorous Research in Engineering Education (RREE) Program Cover

The Importance of Community in Fostering Change: A Qualitative Case Study of the Rigorous Research in Engineering Education (RREE) Program

Open Access
|Oct 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Rank and institution type of RREE participants.

Rank at time of RREEInstitution Type
PublicPrivate not-for-profit
Assistant Professor415
Associate Professor3216
Full Professor2211
Other184
Total11336
Figure 1

Sampling procedure.

Table 2

Study participants summarized by rank and institution type.

PseudonymRank at time of interviewInstitution type
AndyAssociate ProfessorLarge, state university
CathyNon-tenure-trackLarge, state university
DavidAssociate ProfessorLarge, state university
EdwardAssociate ProfessorLarge, state university
JanetAssistant ProfessorSmall, private liberal arts
JoanneAssistant ProfessorEngineering-focused university
MatthewProfessorMid-sized private college
NickAssociate ProfessorLarge, state university
RobertProfessorLarge, state university
Figure 2

Summary of the impacts of the RREE reported by participants.

Table 3

Type of impact, their definitions, and number of participants who mentioned the themes.

ThemesDefinitionNumber of participants
LearningUnderstanding what is (and is not) ‘rigorous’ research in engineering education8 of 9
MeaningCreating and synthesizing knowledge about engineering education methods and theories9 of 9
IdentityBeing part of the RREE community and/or part of the larger EER community9 of 9
CatalystHow participating in the RREE project was instrumental in initiating change in a participant’s perspective about their current research endeavor and subsequent development of careers in engineering education4* of 9
*All those who mentioned lack of support mentioned the RREE as a catalyst. No one who mentioned a supportive environment mentioned this theme.
Table 4

How the design of RREE workshops aligned with CoP recommendations (R. Streveler, Smith, and Miller 2005).

Community of Practice Recommendation from Wenger et al. (2002)Corresponding RREE Workshop Feature
‘old-timers’ welcome and mentor the ‘newcomers’
  • ‘old-timers’ from ASEE, AERA, and POD as workshop facilitators

  • funding provided to attendees as honorarium for mentors

members of community have a variety of informal spaces to meet in ad hoc pairs or small groups for further discussion
  • workshop location allows for small group exercise and reflection

  • time scheduled in the middle of the day for assimilation/reflection and unstructured discussion

  • reception to kick off the event on first evening

  • daily common meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner)

  • workshop room was set up with round tables for (changing) discussion groups

  • workshop features interactive sessions (e.g. interactive and cooperative learning)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.7 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 20 - 37
Submitted on: Aug 22, 2019
Accepted on: Jul 2, 2020
Published on: Oct 9, 2020
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Nicole Pitterson, Cheryl Allendoerfer, Ruth Streveler, Juan Ortega-Alvarez, Karl Smith, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.