Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring Patterns in Engineering Brainstorming Conversations by Combining Discourse Analysis and Statistical Methods Cover

Exploring Patterns in Engineering Brainstorming Conversations by Combining Discourse Analysis and Statistical Methods

By:  and    
Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Anderson, M., Chanthavane, S., Broshkevitch, A., Braden, P., Bassford, C., Kim, M., Fantini, M., Konig, S., Owens, T., & Sorensen, C. (2022). A Survey of Web-Based Tools for Collaborative Engineering Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 144(1), 014001 (8 pages). 10.1115/1.4051768
  2. Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359379. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x
  3. Atman, C. J., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., & Adams, R. S. (2005). Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: an in-depth follow-up study. Design Studies, 26(4), 325357. 10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.005
  4. Badke-Schaub, P., Goldschmidt, G., & Meijer, M. (2010). How does cognitive conflict in design teams support the development of creative ideas? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 119133. 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00553.x
  5. Bonnardel, N., & Didier, J. (2020). Brainstorming variants to favor creative design. Applied Ergonomics, 83, 0102987. 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102987
  6. Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging research methodologies in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186210. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x
  7. Chiem, A. (2023). Discourse Analysis in Engineering: Investigating Patterns in Brainstorming Conversations [Master of Science]. Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/theses/2722
  8. Chindanon, K., & Koretsky, M. D. (2023). Group Practice in Engineering: Productive Interactions during a Realistic, Open-Ended Task. Studies in Engineering Education, 4(2), 144175. 10.21061/see.112
  9. Chulvi, V., Mulet, E., Chakrabarti, A., López-Mesa, B., & González-Cruz, C. (2012). Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 241269. 10.1080/09544828.2011.624501
  10. Cole, C., Marhefka, J., Jablokow, K., Mohammed, S., Ritter, S., & Miller, S. (2022). What Is the Relationship Between Psychological Safety and Team Productivity and Effectiveness During Concept Development? An Exploration in Engineering Design Education. Journal of Mechanical Design, 144(11). 10.1115/1.4054874
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publishing. ISBN: 978-1483344379. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book241842
  12. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427441. 10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
  13. Daly, S. R., McKilligan, S., Murphy, L. R., & Ostrowski, A. (2017). Tracing problem evolution: Factors that impact design problem definition. In B. T. Christensen, L. J. Ball, & K. Halskov (Eds.), Analysing design thinking: Studies of cross-cultural co-creation (pp. 555572). CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. 10.1201/9781315208169-30
  14. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103120. 10.1002/J.2168-9830.2005.TB00832.X
  15. Eggert, R., Joshi, A., Mehrotra, S., Zastavker, Y. V, Olin, F. W., & Darer, V. (2014). Using Discourse Analysis to Understand “Failure Modes” of Undergraduate Engineering Teams. 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044436
  16. Gee, J. P. (2010). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis Theory and Method (Third). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203847886
  17. Gelman, A., Hill, J., & Yajima, M. (2012). Why we (usually) don’t have to worry about multiple comparisons. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5(2), 189211. 10.1080/19345747.2011.618213
  18. Gius, G., Osman, A., Nevrly, M. R., & Lutz, B. D. (2020). Exploring the influence of team gender composition during conceptual brainstorming activities. 2020 ASEE Pacific Southwest Section Conference. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/36028
  19. Johnstone, B., & Andrus, J. (2024). Discourse Analysis (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-1-394-18516-0. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Discourse+Analysis%2C+4th+Edition-p-9781394185160
  20. Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated engineering learning: Bridging engineering education research and the learning sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 151185. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x
  21. Kavadias, S., & Sommer, S. C. (2009). The effects of problem structure and team diversity on brainstorming effectiveness. Management Science, 55(12), 18991913. 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1079
  22. Kittleson, J. M., & Southerland, S. A. (2004). The Role of Discourse in Group Knowledge Construction: A Case Study of Engineering Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267293. 10.1002/tea.20003
  23. Leydens, J. A., & Lucena, J. C. (2018). Engineering justice: Transforming engineering education and practice. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Engineering+Justice%3A+Transforming+Engineering+Education+and+Practice-p-9781118757307
  24. Linsey, J. S., & Becker, B. (2010). Effectiveness of Brainwriting Techniques: Comparing Nominal Groups to Real Teams. In T. Taura & Y. Nagai (Eds.), Design Creativity (pp. 165172). Springer. 10.1007/978-0-85729-224-7_22
  25. Lu, K., Qiao, X., & Hao, N. (2019). Praising or keeping silent on partner’s ideas: Leading brainstorming in particular ways. Neuropsychologia, 124, 1930. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.004
  26. Lutz, B. D., Chiem, A., & Bethel, C. (2022). Using Discourse Analysis to Investigate Conversations during Engineering Brainstorming Activities. 2022 ASEE Zone 4 Annual Conference. 10.18260/1-2-–;44757
  27. McNair, L. D., Paretti, M. C., & Davitt, M. (2010). Towards a pedagogy of relational space and trust: Analyzing distributed collaboration using discourse and speech act analysis. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(3), 233248. 10.1109/TPC.2010.2052857
  28. Mileva, E. (2009). Effects of anonymity: discourse analysis of conversation in electronic brainstorming. Unpublished MS, Department of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323255771
  29. Murphy, L. R., Daly, S. R., & Seifert, C. M. (2023). Idea characteristics arising from individual brainstorming and design heuristics ideation methods. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(2), 337378. 10.1007/s10798-021-09723-0
  30. Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving. Charles Scribner’s Sons. https://archive.org/details/appliedimaginati00osbo
  31. Osman, A., Cuellar, E., Chiem, A. T., Bethel, C., & Lutz, B. D. (2021). Investigating Student Perceptions of Team-based Brainstorming During Conceptual Design: Challenges and Recommendations. 2021 ASEE Pacific Southwest Conference- “Pushing Past Pandemic Pedagogy: Learning from Disruption”. 10.18260/1-2-–;38238
  32. Özyaprak, M. (2016). The effectiveness of SCAMPER technique on creative thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(1), 3140. http://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jegys/issue/37319/430616
  33. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.-H. (2007). Engineering design: a systematic approach (Vol. 157). Springer Science & Business Media. 10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2
  34. Savaria, M. C., & Monteiro, K. A. (2017). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Engineering Course Syllabi and Recommendations for Increasing Engagement among Women in STEM. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 18(1). Retrieved from https://jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/2217
  35. Selart, M., Nordström, T., Kuvaas, B., & Takemura, K. (2008). Effects of reward on self-regulation, intrinsic motivation and creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(5), 439458. 10.1080/00313830802346314
  36. Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111134. 10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0
  37. Shah, J. J., Vargas-Hernandez, N., Summers, J. D., & Kulkarni, S. (2001). Collaborative sketching (C-sketch) – An idea generation technique for engineering design. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(3), 168198. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01045.x
  38. Svihla, V., Peele-Eady, T., & Gallup, A. (2021). Exploring agency in capstone design problem framing. Studies in Engineering Education, 2(2), 96119. 10.21061/see.69
  39. Ulrich, K. T., Eppinger, S. D., & Yang, M. C. (2020). Product design and development (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/product-design-and-development-7-ulrich.html
  40. Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013). Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 626659. 10.1002/jee.20029
  41. Wieselmann, J. R. (2019). Student participation in small group, integrated STEM activities: An investigation of gender differences (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/209027
  42. Wieselmann, J. R., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2020). “I Just Do What the Boys Tell Me”: Exploring Small Group Student Interactions in an Integrated STEM Unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(1), 112144. 10.1002/tea.21587
  43. Wieselmann, J. R., Dare, E. A., Roehrig, G., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2019). Participation in small group engineering design activities at the middle school level: An investigation of gender differences. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. 10.18260/1-2-–;33158
  44. Wieselmann, J. R., Keratithamkul, K., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2021). Discourse Analysis in Integrated STEM Activities: Methods for Examining Power and Positioning in Small Group Interactions. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 113133. 10.1007/s11165-020-09950-w
  45. You, J. W. (2021). Enhancing creativity in team project-based learning amongst science college students : The moderating role of psychological safety. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 135145. 10.1080/14703297.2020.1711796
  46. Zhao, Z., & Hou, J. (2010). The study on influencing factors of team brainstorming effectiveness. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(1), 181. 10.5539/ijbm.v5n1p181
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.192 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 22
Submitted on: Oct 14, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 21, 2025
Published on: Mar 24, 2026
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Aimee Chiem, Ben Lutz, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.