Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Interrogating the Use of Large Language Models in Qualitative Research Using the Qualifying Qualitative Research Quality Framework Cover

Interrogating the Use of Large Language Models in Qualitative Research Using the Qualifying Qualitative Research Quality Framework

Open Access
|Jul 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Mapping of questions for researchers to ask themselves to address the role of the researcher and LLMs in the research process. Built from Walther et al. (2017).

CRITERIONQUESTIONS TO POSE
Ethical Validation
  • What is your purpose for using an LLM in your research, and how does it impact your ability to do justice to the lived realities of the participants?

  • How will you consider participant privacy when handling the data?

  • Will the participants know that an LLM will be used in the research process, and have you obtained their consent?

Theoretical Validation
  • How is the social reality under study reflected in the training data?

  • If the model is proprietary (training data is unavailable), how does the ambiguity in the training data influence the study of the full social reality in your research?

  • How will you determine if the findings generated by an LLM constitute a meaningful contribution to the literature or if findings over-emphasize depth?

  • What expertise do you possess to evaluate the model output’s quality in the research context?

Procedural Validation
  • How can you interrogate the black-box nature of large language models to enhance the trustworthiness of the results?

  • How will you interrogate the biases in the model and manage them while analyzing the data? And how can you do this in combination with interrogating your positionality?

Communicative Validation
  • What robust methods can be used for co-constructing interpretative meanings with the LLM?

  • To what extent can meaning be co-constructed between the participant and an LLM in the absence of the researcher? And how involved does the researcher need to be in making data?

Pragmatic Validation
  • What methods can be used to reconcile the model’s output with practice?

  • How will you assess the meaningfulness of the LLM’s output with respect to the social reality under investigation in other contexts?

Process Reliability
  • Because large language models are probabilistic systems, how will you manage the randomness in the output? What about potential inaccuracies?

  • If the model is commercially hosted and updated (potentially without warning), how can consistency in the findings be achieved?

  • What information can be disclosed about your use of LLMs to document the process of making and handling the data? (e.g., chat logs, prompts, model version, date of conversation).

Table 2

Table generated by ChatGPT in response to prompt.

QUESTIONSTHRESHOLD CONCEPT QUALITY
1. What fundamental ideas or principles in cyber-physical systems were particularly challenging for you to grasp when first learning about the field?Transformational
2. Can you identify any concepts that, once understood, significantly changed your perspective or approach to solving problems in cyber-physical systems?Integrative*
3. Were there any concepts that took a considerable amount of time and effort to fully internalize, but were essential for your professional growth in this field?Irreversible*
4. Describe any concepts that bridge the gap between theory and practical application in cyber-physical systems. Which ones were difficult to bridge?Troublesome*
5. Have you encountered any concepts that, once mastered, allowed you to communicate more effectively with colleagues and experts in cyber-physical systems?Discursive
6. Are there concepts in this discipline that are often misunderstood or misinterpreted by newcomers or even experienced professionals? If so, which ones and why?Liminal*

[i] *Upon review, the group did not agree with the classification made by ChatGPT (GPT 3.5).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.174 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 23
Submitted on: Mar 21, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 4, 2025
Published on: Jul 4, 2025
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 David Reeping, Cynthia Hampton, Desen Özkan, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.