Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Perceptions and Practices of Military Friendly Organizations Cover

Perceptions and Practices of Military Friendly Organizations

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Participant Demographics.

EMPLOYEEYEARS W/ORGANIZATIONINDUSTRYORGANIZATION SIZEMILITARY AFF.YEARS AFF.FAMILIARITY
Person One7Transport100–249V/F0Somewhat
Person Two8Manufacture100–249N8Moderately
Person Three15Oil50–99F15Extremely
Person Four1Waste50–99N1Somewhat
Person Five16Manufacture250–500N16Extremely
Person Six4Manufacture100–249N10Somewhat
Person Seven6Manufacture100–249U6Moderately
Person Eight14Manufacture50–99F5Somewhat
Person Nine3Manufacture250–500N3Somewhat
Person Ten6Distribution500–999F6Extremely

[i] Note: Years w/Organization = Number of years the interview participant has worked for their current organization; Industry = Type of industry the interview participant reported their current organization is in; Organization Size = Number of current employees in the interview participant’s organization; Military Aff. = Represents how the interview participant is affiliated with the military; V = Veteran; F = Family member of veteran or someone currently serving; S = Spouse of a veteran or someone currently serving; N = No immediate affiliation; U = Unknown; Years Aff. = Number of years the interview participant reported being “involved” with military friendly programming; Familiarity = Level of which the interview participant reported being familiar with their current organization’s military friendly programs.

Table 2

Military Friendly Coding Dictionary.

CODESDEFINITIONS
AccommodationsAny reference to the employer’s willingness to accommodate/provide additional assistance to military/veterans.
Desired ImprovementsAny reference to ideas/opportunities for military friendly improvement.
Employee Knowledge DeficitAny reference to employee/co-workers being unaware of military affiliated behaviors/attitudes/characteristics.
Employee ResponsibilitiesAny reference to job duties taking precedence over military friendly programming.
Employer Knowledge DeficitAny reference to employer knowledge deficits related to military service/veteran issues.
Expressed InterestAny reference to employer interest in hiring and/or retaining veterans.
Favorable Veteran PerceptionsAny reference to positives of veterans that does not fit with other veteran benefit codes.
GratitudeAny reference to interviewees’/organizations’ gratitude or appreciation of military members and their service.
Historical PracticesAny reference to military friendly specific strategies/programming/assessments maintained over time.
Interest in LearningAny reference to interest in learning more about military friendly.
JustificationAny reference to the need/lack thereof to justify hiring a veteran.
Military ConnectionAny reference to employee connections to the military.
No Military Friendly AssessmentAny reference to no assessment noted for military friendly specific program(s).
No Military Friendly ProgramAny reference to no military friendly specific program(s) noted.
Prioritize RecruitingAny reference to pointedly targeting/recruiting military/veterans.
Recognition or DesignationAny reference to being designated as a military friendly employer.
Social or Sense of ResponsibilityAny reference to moral or ethical sense of obligation/responsibility to support the military/veterans.
StigmasAny reference to negative stigmas held towards the military/veterans.
TraitsAny reference to veterans having acquired, due to military service, characteristics or traits.
Unchanged PerceptionsAny reference to interviewees’/organizations’ understanding of military friendly remaining consistent over time.
Veteran KnowledgeAny reference to knowledge gained that occurs during military service.
Veteran PerceptionsAny reference to the interviewees’ perceptions of veterans’ perceptions of the employer being military friendly.
Win-WinAny reference to mutual benefits for veterans and the employer.
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 35
Submitted on: Nov 9, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 26, 2020
Published on: Mar 1, 2021
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Michael Kirchner, Faith Stull, Katie Holloway, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.