High-Risk, High-Impact Health Services Research: Developing an Innovation Initiative
References
- Ahmadpoor, M., & Jones, B. F. (2017). The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science, 357(6351), 583–587. DOI: 10.1126/science.aam9527
- Anthony, S. D. (2017). The little black book of innovation, with a new preface: How it works, how to do it. Harvard Business Review Press. ISBN-13: 978-1633693401
- Asch, D. A., & Rosin, R. (2015). Innovation as discipline, not fad. New England Journal of Medicine, 373(7), 592–594. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1506311
- Atkins, D., Tomoyasu, N., & Paolicelli, C. (2018). Innovation initiative program RFA: High risk, high impact health services research. VA HSR&D Cyberseminar, Virtual.
https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/cyber_seminars/archives/3535-notes.pdf - Bindman, A., Pronovost, P., & Asch, D. (2018). Funding innovation in a learning health care System. JAMA, 319(2), 119–120. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.18205
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Creswell, J. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
- Fleming, L., Greene, H., Li, G., Marx, M., & Yao, D. (2019). Government-funded research increasingly fuels innovation. Science, 364(6446), 1139–1141. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw2373
- HSR&D Merit Review Success Rates. (2018, February 5). [Government]. Health Services Research & Development.
https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/merit_review/success_rates.cfm - Lyon, A. R., & Koerner, K. (n.d.). User-centered design for psychosocial intervention development and implementation. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(2), 180–200. DOI: 10.1111/cpsp.12154
- Lyon, A. R., Lewis, C. C., Melvin, A., Boyd, M., Nicodimos, S., Liu, F., & Jungbluth, N. (2015). Health Information Technologies—Academic and Commercial Evaluation (HIT-ACE) methodology: Description and application to clinical feedback systems. Implementation Science, 11(1), 128. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0495-2
- Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. DOI: 10.1177/1609406917733847
- Poirier, V., Schwartz, L. H., Eddy, D., Berman, R., Chacour, S., Wynne, J. J., Cavanaugh, W., Martin, D. F., Byrne, R., & Sanberg, P. R. (2017). Thoughts on improving innovation: What are the characteristics of innovation and how do we cultivate them? Technology & Innovation, 18(4), 319–330. DOI: 10.21300/18.4.2017.319
- Riley, W. T., Glasgow, R. E., Etheredge, L., & Abernethy, A. P. (2013). Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: A call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clinical and Translational Medicine, 2(1), 1. DOI: 10.1186/2001-1326-2-10
- Sensmeier, J. E. (2012). Disruptive innovation and the changing face of healthcare. Nursing Management, 43(11), 13–14. DOI: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000421681.71712.86
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jvs.v6i1.169 | Journal eISSN: 2470-4768
Language: English
Page range: 171 - 177
Submitted on: Jan 13, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 17, 2020
Published on: May 18, 2020
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2020 Jolie N. Haun, Naomi Tomoyasu, Courtney Paolicelli, Christine Melillo, David Atkins, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.