Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale 15 Item Self-Report Version (IGRS-15s): Exploring the Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties in a Sample of American Post 9/11 Active-Duty and Veteran Military Personnel Cover

The Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale 15 Item Self-Report Version (IGRS-15s): Exploring the Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties in a Sample of American Post 9/11 Active-Duty and Veteran Military Personnel

Open Access
|Apr 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Personal and Military Demographic Data of Sample (N = 229) and Normative DoD Demographics.

% TOTAL SAMPLE (n)2020 DoD DATA
Race/Ethnicity
    Asian4.4% (10)4.8%
    Black7.4% (17)17.2%
    Latino9.6% (22)17.2%
    White69.0% (158)68.9%
    Other9.6% (22)9.1%
Gender
    Female16.6% (38)17.2%
    Male83.4% (191)82.8%
Branch
    Air Force12.3% (28)24.7%
    Army38.0% (87)36.1%
    Marines39.3% (90)13.6%
    Navy9.6% (22)25.6%
Duty status
    Active27.5% (63)
    Veteran72.5% (166)

[i] Note. Two respondents did not provide answers regarding their branch of service at the time of their deployment to combat, therefore branch results total to 227 rather than 229. Department of Defense (DoD) race data does not include ethnicity, but a noteworthy portion of the DOD endorsed being ethnically Latino, as a result, the DoD data add up to more than 100%.

Table 2

Item Composition and Factor Structure of the Four-Factor IGRS-15s in a Study of English-Speaking Civilians (Leonardi et al., 2022) and in the Current Sample of US Active Duty and Veteran Military Members (N = 229).

FACTORITEM #TEXTSURVIVOR GUILTSELF-HATEOMNIPOTENCE (D/S)OMNIPOTENCE (R)
Survivor guilt7The idea of being envied makes me uncomfortable.61 (.53).17 (.10).22 (.11).22 (.27)
2I feel uncomfortable feeling better off than other people.64 (.57).37 (.25).27 (.11).21 (.27)
4I feel uncomfortable when I believe I am better than others.67 (.65).37 (.19).26 (.14).36 (.38)
12I conceal or minimize my successes out of concern for making less successful people feel bad.60 (.57).34 (.30).25 (.25).43 (.43)
15I feel uncomfortable when I receive better treatment that others.71 (.66).17 (.27).18 (.32).27 (.35)
Self-hate1I believe that if other people really know me, they would want nothing to do with me.32 (.26).78 (.84).25 (.10).21 (.24)
11I do not deserve to be happy.37 (.33).80 (.69).38 (.13).28 (.33)
6I believe I have tricked others into liking me.21 (.20).70 (.68).32 (.11).38 (.34)
Omnipotence (disloyalty/separation)13I would feel bad if I doubted about the values and beliefs of my family.33 (.16).30 (.08).38 (.61).07 (.23)
8I feel I should visit my parents as often as they wish.22 (.20).21 (.03).89 (.69).27 (.31)
14I think I should not separate from loved ones because this would be hurtful, disloyal, or make them feel abandoned.39 (.29).34 (.15).39 (.62).27 (.31)
10I tend to put aside my interests, needs, and passions to take care of other people.30 (.20).44 (.15).68 (.72).31 (.36)
Omnipotence (responsibility)9I feel overly responsible for other people’s wellbeing.42 (.43).32 (.32).40 (.46).77 (.77)
3I feel it is my responsibility to fix other people’s problems.35 (.37).32 (.27).26 (.27).73 (.70)
5I feel selfish and insensitive if I am not the person who takes care of other people.52 (.51).58 (.39).30 (.26).62 (.59)

[i] Note. Omnipotence (D/S) = Omnipotence (Disloyalty/Separation) subscale of IGRS-15s; Omnipotence I = Omnipotence (Responsibility) subscale of the IGRS-15s. Loadings in bold are loaded highest onto that subscale/factor. Loadings listed first, i.e., .NN, are item loadings found in the current study. Loadings listed second and in parentheses, i.e. (.NN), are item loadings from Leonardi et al., (2022).

Table 3

Internal Consistencies of Four-Factor Solution in Previous Study of Italian Citizens (Gazzillo et al., 2018), English-Speaking Civilians (Leonardi et al., 2022), and Subscale Intercorrelations in Current Sample of US Post 9/11 Veterans.

FACTORαaαbαcSURVIVORO (D/S)O (R)SELF-HATE
Survivor guilt.76.75.781
Omnipotence (disloyalty).57.73.69.401
Omnipotence (responsibility).64.72.72.44.401
Self-hate.68.76.81.44.45.471

[i] Note. O (D/S) = Omnipotence (Disloyalty/Separation); O (R) = Omnipotence (Responsibility). All correlations were significant at the p < .001 level.

αa = Cronbach’s alpha for IGRS-15s in Gazzillo et al., 2018.

αb = Cronbach’s alpha for IGRS-15s in Leonardi et al., 2022.

αc = Cronbach’s alpha for IGRS-15s in the present study.

Table 4

Correlations Between IGRS-15s Total and Factor Scores with Other Measures.

SELF-HATESURVIVOROMNI (D)OMNI (R)IGRSTRGIPCL-5PHQ-9
Self-hate1.00
Survivor.441.00
Omni (D).45.401.00
Omni (R).47.44.401.00
IGRS.79.80.74.691.00
TRGI.61.33.37.21.511.00
PCL-5.59.33.31.26.50.691.00
PHQ-9.56.28.24.21.43.58.851.00

[i] Note. All correlations were significant at the p < .001 level. Omni (D) = Omnipotence (Disloyalty/Separation) subscale of the IGRS-15s; Omni (R) = Omnipotence (Responsibility) subscale of the IGRS-15s; IGRS = IGRS-15s total score; TRGI = Trauma-Related Guilt Inventory (TRGI; Kubany et al., 1996); PCL-5 = PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (Blevins et al., 2015); PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire, 9-Item version (Kroenke et al., 2001).

Table 5

Sample (N = 229) Distribution of PCL-5 and PHQ-9 Scores by Symptom Severity Level.

PCL-5 SCOREN (%)PHQ-9 SCOREN (%)
>6026 (10.9%)Severe (20–27)22 (9.6%)
46–6022 (9.2%)Moderately Severe (15–19)32 (14.0%)
31–4554 (23.7%)Moderate (10–14)53 (28.4%)
16–3045 (19.7%)Mild (5–9)47 (20.5%)
0–1582 (36.2%)None (0–4)75 (32.8%)

[i] Note. PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) Score ranges were derived from the mean (15.42) and standard deviations (14.72) noted in Blevins and colleagues’ (2015) analysis of the PCL-5. PHQ-9 severity categories were generated based on those described by Kroenke (2001).

Language: English
Page range: 125 - 138
Submitted on: Oct 15, 2023
Accepted on: Feb 6, 2024
Published on: Apr 16, 2024
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Matthew L. McCue, Ashlee N. Fisher, Carolyn B. Allard, Constance J. Dalenberg, Alexander O. Hauson, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.