Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mapping Diversity of Publication Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities: An Approach Making Use of Fuzzy Cluster Analysis Cover

Mapping Diversity of Publication Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities: An Approach Making Use of Fuzzy Cluster Analysis

Open Access
|Sep 2017

References

  1. Chi, P.S. (2015). Changing publication and citation patterns in political science in Germany. Scientometrics, 105, 1833–1848.
  2. Dunn, J.C. (1976). Indices of partition fuzziness and the detection of clusters in large data sets. In M. Gupta (Ed.), Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes. New York: Elsevier.
  3. Engels, T.C.E., Ossenblok, T.L.B., & Spruyt, E.H.J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 93(2), 373–390.
  4. Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (pp. 473–496). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  5. Johnson, R.A., & Wichern, D.W. (1992). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (Third ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  6. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P.J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.
  7. Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980–2000. Scientometrics, 58(1), 35–48.
  8. Lin, Y., & Kaid, L.L. (2000). Fragmentation of the intellectual structure of political communication study: Some empirical evidence. Scientometrics, 47(1), 143–164.
  9. Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963–1999. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 213–239.
  10. Nederhof, A.J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100.
  11. Nederhof, A.J. (2011). A bibliometric study of productivity and impact of modern language and literature research. Research in Science Education, 20(2), 117–129.
  12. Ossenblok, T.L.B. (2016). Scientific communication in the social sciences and humanities. Analysis of publication and collaboration in Flanders. Antwerp. (University of Antwerp Ph.D. dissertation)
  13. Persson, O. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of two subdomains in philosophy: Free will and sorites. Scientometrics, 103(1), 47–73.
  14. Puuska, H.M. (2014). Scholarly publishing patterns in Finland—a comparison of disciplinary groups. (doctoral dissertation), University ofTampere, Tampere, Finland.
  15. Sivertsen, G. (2009). Publication patterns in all fields. In F. Aström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. W. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday (pp. 55–60). Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
  16. Vanderstraeten, R. (2010). Scientific communication: Sociology journals and publication practices. Sociology, 44, 559–576.
  17. Verleysen, F.T., & Weeren, A. (2016). Clustering by publication patterns of senior authors in the social sciences and humanities. Journal of Informetrics, 10, 254–272.
  18. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20309/jdis.201624 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 59
Submitted on: Aug 2, 2016
Accepted on: Aug 24, 2016
Published on: Sep 1, 2017
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Frederik T. Verleysen, Arie Weeren, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.