References
- Adie, E., & Roe, W. (2013). Altmetric: Enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics. Learned Publishing, 26(1), 11–17.
- Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Bettencourt, L., Chute, R., Rodriguez, M. A., & Balakireva, L. (2009). Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science. PLOS One, 4(3), e4803.
- Henning, V., & Reichelt, J. (2008). Mendeley-a last.fm for research? In IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience (pp. 327–328). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
- Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015a). An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 309–320.
- Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015b). Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 3: Books and non standard outputs. El Profesional de la Información, 24(6), 724–736.
- Li, X., & Thelwall, M. (2012). F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (Vol. 2, pp. 451–551). Montreal Quebec, Canada.
- Li, Z., Tate, D., Lane, C., & Adams, C. (2012). A framework for automatic TRIZ level of invention estimation of patents using natural language processing, knowledge-transfer and patent citation metrics. Computer-aided Design, 44(10), 987–1010.
- Lin, J., & Fenner, M. (2013). Altmetrics in evolution: Defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics. Information Standards Quarterly, 25(2), 20.
- Liu, J., & Adie, E. (2013). Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker’s perspective. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 31–34.
- Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Moed, H. F. (2006). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., & Larivière, V. (2015). Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1832–1846.
- Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M. & Kousha, K. (2016). Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1198–1209. 10.1002/asi.23477.
- Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627–1638.
- Piwowar, H., & Priem, J. (2013). The power of altmetrics on a CV. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 10–13.
- Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874.
- Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
- Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1131–1143.
- Sugimoto, C.R., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Scholars on soap boxes: Science communication and dissemination via TED videos. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(4), 663–674.
- Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLOS One, 8(5), e64841.
- Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015a). Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web. El Profesional de la Información, 24(5), 587–606.
- Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015b). Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 2: Social media metrics. El Profesional de la Información, 24(5), 607–620.
- Thelwall, M., & Maflahi, N. (2015). Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of Mendeley readers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(6), 1124–1135. 10.1002/asi.23252.
- Thelwall, M., & Wilson, P. (in press). Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 10.1002/asi.23501.
- Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14), 1313–1322.
- Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control: Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century (pp. 847–857). Utrecht: SURF foundation.
- Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491–1513.