Socio-economic determinants of environmental degradation:  Empirical evidence for the Environmental Kuznets Curve

Gültekin, Ömer Faruk; Sayar, Ramazan; Ari, Yılmaz Onur

doi:10.18559/ebr.2023.3.797

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to examine socio-economic determinants of environmental degradation. The empirical study employs quantile regression which enables separate predictions for different levels of the dependent variable to be made. This study investigated 62 countries from low, middle and some high income countries for 1995–2019. The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) is verified for the aforemented countries in analyzing the relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions using quantile regression. The study also revealed that the schooling rate has a pollution-increasing effect. In addition to the reducing effects of trade openness, democracy, and economic freedom variables on environmental degradation, the opposite effect of life expectancy at birth is observed, increasing environmental degradation. In this context, this paper concluded that the EKC hypothesis is not supported. The government should encourage pollution-reducing policies in low and middle income countries.

References

AlKhars, A. M., Alwahaishi, S., Fallatah. M. R., & Kayal, A. (2022). A literature review of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in GCC for 2010–2020. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 14, 100181.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alkhateeb, T. T., Mahmood, H., Altamimi, N. N., & Furqan, M. (2020). Role of education and economic growth on the CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 195–209.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alshehry, A. S., & Belloumi, M. (2016). Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: The case of Saudi Arabia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 237–247.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anwar, A., Siddique, M., Dogan, E., & Sharif, A. (2021). The moderating role of renewable and non-renewable energy in environment-income nexus for ASEAN countries: Evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Renewable Energy, 164, 956–967.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anwar, A., Sinha, A., Sharif, A., Siddique, M., Irshad, S., Anwar, W., & Malik, S. (2021). The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy consumption, financial development, and CO2 emissions: Evidence from selected Asian countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(5), 6556–6576.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Awan, A., Kocoglu, M., Banday, T. P., & Tarazkar, M. H. (2022). Revisiting global energy efficiency and CO2 emission nexus: Fresh evidence from the panel quantile regression model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 47502–47515.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Aye, G. C. (2020). Wealth inequality and CO2 emissions in emerging countries: The case of BRICS. SA-TIED Working Paper, 153.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Aytun, C., & Akın, C. S. (2021). Can education lower the environmental degradation? Bootstrap panel Granger causality analysis for emerging countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 10666–10694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01877-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Azomahou, T., Laisney, F., & Van, P. N. (2006). Economic development and CO2 emissions: A nonparametric panel approach. Journal of Public Economics, 90(6–7), 1347–1363.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bucak, Ç. (2022). Ekonomik özgürlük endeksi, insani gelişme endeksi ve ekolojik ayak izi: E7 ülkeleri için ampirik bir analiz. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(23), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.53092/duiibfd.992572
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buks, A. G., & Sobański, K. (2023). Divest or engage? Effective paths to net zero from the US perspective. Economics and Business Review, 9(1), 65–93.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bunnag, T. (2023). Analyzing short-run and long-run causality relationship among CO2 emission, energy consumption, GDP, square of GDP, and foreign direct investment in Environmental Kuznets Curve for Thailand. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(2), 341–348.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bui, Q., Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Le, P. H., & Vu, K. D. (2021). Revisiting the biomass energy-economic growth linkage of BRICS countries: A panel quantile regression with fixed effects approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128382.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Busse, M., & Hefeker, C. (2007). Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 397–415.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carlsson, F., & Lundström, S. (2001, August). Political and economic freedom and the environment: The case of CO2 emissions. Working Papers in Economics, 29. Department of Economics, Göteborg University.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, W., & Lei, Y. (2018). The impacts of renewable energy and technological innovation on environment-energy-growth nexus: New evidence from a panel quantile regression. Renewable Energy, 123, 1–14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Choi, I. (2006). Nonstationary panels. In: K. Patterson, T. C. Mills (Eds.), Palgrave handbooks of econometrics (vol. 1, pp. 511–539). Palgrave Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49, 431–455.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eren, M. (2022). Different impacts of democracy and income on carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from a panel quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 71439–71459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20805-x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eyuboğlu, K., & Uzar, U. (2021). A new perspective to environmental degradation: The linkages between higher education and CO2 emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 482–493.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fitzgerald, J. A., Jorgenson, A. K., & Clark, B. (2015). Energy consumption and working hours: A longitudinal study of developed and developing nations, 1990–2008. Environmental Sociology, 1(3), 213–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2015.1046584
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fodha, M., & Zaghdoud, O. (2010). Economic growth and pollution emissions in Tunisia: An empirical analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Energy Policy, 38, 1150–1156.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fotourehchi, Z. (2017). Income inequality and environmental degradation: Challenge in the equality hypothesis with emphasis on education level. Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 5(4), 77–84.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Genç, M. C., Ekinci, A., & Sakarya, B. (2021). The impact of output volatility on CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with Fourier stationarity test. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(2), 3008–3021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper, 3914.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gulistan, A., Tariq, Y. B., & Bashir, M. F. (2020). Dynamic relationship among economic growth, energy, trade openness, tourism, and environmental degradation: Fresh global evidence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12), 13477–13487.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Harbaugh, W., Levinson, A., & Wilson, D. M. (2002). Re-examining the empirical evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(3), 541–551.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hassan, S. T., Batool, B., Zhu, B., & Khan, I. (2022). Environmental complexity of globalization, education, and income inequalities: New insights of energy poverty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 340, 130735.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hassan, S. A., Zaman, K., & Gul, S. (2015). The relationship between growth-inequality-poverty triangle and environmental degradation: Unveiling the reality. Arab Economics and Business Journal, 10, 57–71.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holtz-Eakin, D., & Selden, T. (1995). Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 57(1), 85–101.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
IEA (2021). Global annual average change in energy production by fuel, 1971–2019. Paris. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-annual-average-change-in-energy-production-by-fuel-1971-2019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kennedy, P. (1992). A guide to econometrics. Blackwell.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Khan, M. (2020). CO2 emissions and sustainable economic development: New evidence on the role of human capital. Sustainable Development, 28, 1279–1288.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Knight, K., Rosa, E., & Schor, J. (2013). Could working less reduce pressures on the environment? A cross-national panel analysis of OECD countries, 1970–2007. Global Environmental Change, 23(4), 691–700.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koenker, R., & Hallock, K. F.(2001). Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 143–156.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1–28.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Le, T. H., Chang, Y, & Park, D. (2016). Trade openness and environmental quality: International evidence. Energy Policy, 92, 45–55.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. (2006). Democracy and environmental degradation. International Studies Quarterly, 50(4), 935–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00432.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mak Arvin, B., & Lew, B. (2011). Does democracy affect environmental quality in developing countries? Applied Economics, 43(9), 1151–1160.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marquardt, D. W. (1970). Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics, (12), 591–256.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mason, R. L., Gunst, R. F., & Hess, J. L. (1989). Statistical design and analysis of experiments: Applications to engineering and science (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McPherson, M. A., & Nieswiadomy, M. L. (2005). Environmental Kuznets Curve: Threatened species and spatial effects. Ecological Economics, 55(3), 395–407. Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moon, H. R., & Perron, B. (2004). Testing for a unit root in panels with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics, 122(1), 81–126.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O ’ Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Odugbesan, J. A., Rjoub, H., & Ifediora, C. U. (2021). Do financial regulations matters for sustainable green economy: Evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 56642–56657.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ojaghlou, M., Ugurlu, E., Kadłubek, M., & Thalassinos, E. (2023). Economic activities and management issues for the environment: An Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and STIRPAT analysis in Turkey. Resources, 12(5), 57.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O ’ Neill, B. C., Jiang, L., Samir, K. C., Fuchs, R., Pachauri, S., Laidlaw, E. K., Zhang, T., Zhou, W., & Ren, X. (2020). The effect of education on determinants of climate change risks. Nature Sustainability, 3, 520–528.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 3220–3225.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pal, D., & Mitra, S. K. (2017). The Environmental Kuznets Curve for carbon dioxide in India and China: Growth and pollution at crossroad. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(2), 371–385.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pesaran, M. H. (2020). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prasetyanto, P. K., & Sari, F. (2021). Environmental Kuznets Curve: Economic growth with environmental degradation in Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(5), 622–628.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rasli, A. M., Qureshi, M. I, Isah-Chikaji, A., Zaman, K., & Ahmad. M. (2018). New toxics, race to the bottom and revised Environmental Kuznets Curve: The case of local and global pollutants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 3120–3130.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Romuald, S. K. (2010). Does education really matter for environmental quality? Economics Bulletin, 30(4), 2612–2626.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scheidt, N. (2019). Education and CO2 emissions through the macroeconomic lens: Assessing the relationship in developing countries from 1996 to 2014. Master Thesis: Lund University.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schor, J. (1998). The overspent American: Upscaling, downshifting, and the new consumer. Basic Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time series and cross-country evidence. The World Bank Washington DC Background Paper for the World Development Report.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shahbaz, M., Khraief, N., Uddin, G. S., & Ozturk, I. (2014). Environmental Kuznets Curve in an open economy: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 325–336.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sini, S., Abdul-Rahim, A. S., Chin, L., Said, R., & Sulaiman, C. (2022). Natural resources impact on capital flow and conflict relationship in Africa: A novel insight from GMM and quantile regression. Resources Policy, 78, 102791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102791
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sun, Y., Anwar, A., Razzaq, A., Liang, X., & Siddique, M. (2022). Asymmetric role of renewable energy, green innovation, and globalization in deriving environmental sustainability: Evidence from top-10 polluted countries. Renewable Energy, 185, 280–290.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Syed, Q. R., Bhowmik, R., Adedoyin, F. F., Alola, A. A., & Khalid, N. (2022). Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk surge CO2 emissions? New insights from panel quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 27845–27861.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Terrell, T. D. (2020). Carbon flux and N- and M-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curves: Evidence from international land use change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(6), 1–20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Veblen, T. (1934). Theory of the leisure class. Modern Library.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Voumik, L. C., Nafi, S. M., Bekun, F. V., & Haseki, M. İ. (2023). Modeling energy, education, trade, and tourism-induced Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis: Evidence from the Middle East. Sustainability, 15(6), 4919. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064919
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
World Bank. (2021). Total greenhouse gas emissions. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.GHGT.KT.CE
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wu, D., Lin, J. C., Fasoli, B., Oda, T., Ye, X., Lauvaux, T., Yang, E. A., & Kort, E. A. (2018). A Lagrangian approach towards extracting signals of urban CO2 emissions from satellite observations of atmospheric column CO2 (XCO2): X-Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport model(“X-STILT v1”). Geoscientific Model Development, 11(12), 4843–4871.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yin, Z., Jiang, X., Lin, S., & Liu, J. (2022). The impact of online education on carbon emissions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Taking Chinese universities as examples. Applied Energy, 314, 118875.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zafar, M. W., Saleem, M. M., Destek, M. A, & Caglar, A. E. (2022). The dynamic linkage between remittances, export diversification, education, renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in top remittance-receiving countries. Sustainable Development, 30, 165–175.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhu, T. T., Peng, H. R., Zhang, Y. J., & Liu, J. Y. (2021). Does higher education development facilitate carbon emissions reduction in China? Applied Economics, 53(47), 5490–5502.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhu, H., Duan, L., Guo, Y., & Yu, K. (2016). The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: Evidence from panel quantile regression. Economic Modelling, 58, 237–248.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Socio-economic determinants of environmental degradation: Empirical evidence for the Environmental Kuznets Curve

Abstract

Paradigm

My account