Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Artificial intelligence—friend or foe in fake news campaigns Cover

References

  1. Agresti, S. Hashemian, S. A., & Carman, M. J. (2022). PoliMi 2022: GPT FlatEarthers at CheckThat! 3 applied to claim detection. In. G. Faggioli, N. Ferro, A. Harbury & M. Potthast (Eds.), Proceedings of the working notes of CLEF 2022—Conference and labs of the evaluation forum. Bologna, Italy. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3180, pp. 422–427. https://ceurws.org/Vol3180/paper-31.pdf
  2. Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing. Cureus, 15(2), e35179. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35179
  3. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.0473
  4. Bang, Y., Cahyawijaya, S., Lee, N., Dai, W., Su, D., Wilie, B., Lovenia, H., Ji, Z., Yu, T., Chung, W., Do, Q. V., Xu, Y., & Fung, P. (2023). A multitask, multilingual, multimo‐ dal evaluation of ChatGPT on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.04023
  5. Bouie, J. (2023, March 11). Disinformation is not the real problem with democracy. The New York Times.
  6. Buchholz, K. (2023, January 24). ChatGPT sprints to one million users. Statista. https://www.statista.com/chart/29174/time‐to‐one‐million‐users/
  7. Candelon, F., di Carlo, R.C., De Bondt, M.,& Evgeniou, T. (2021, September‐October). AI regulation is coming. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/09/ai‐regulation‐is‐coming
  8. Corfield, G. (2023, February 8). $120bn wiped off google after bard AI chatbot gives wrong answer. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2023/02/08/googles‐bard‐ai‐chatbot‐gives‐wrong‐answer‐launch‐event/
  9. Dale, R. (2021). GPT‐3: What’s it good for? Natural Language Engineering, 27(1), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324920000601
  10. Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre‐training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805
  11. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi M., Al‐Busaidi, A., Balakrishman, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., ..., Carter, L. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on oppor‐ tunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
  12. Faggioli, G., Ferro, N., Hanbury, A., Potthast, M. (2022). Proceedings of the working notes of CLEF 2022—Conference and labs of the evaluation forum. Bologna, Italy. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3180. https://ceur‐ws.org/Vol‐3180/
  13. Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT‐3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30, 681–694.
  14. Frieder, S., Pinchetti, L., Griffiths, R.‐R., Salvatori, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Petersen, P. C., Chevalier, A., & Berner, J. (2023). Mathematical capabilities of ChatGPT. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.13867
  15. George, A. S., & George, A. H. (2023). A review of ChatGPT AI’s impact on several business sectors. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal, 1(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7644359
  16. Gibbs, S. (2017, July 17). Elon Musk: Regulate AI to combat ‘existential threat’ befo‐ re it’s too late. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/17/elon‐musk‐regulation‐ai‐combat‐existential‐threat‐tesla‐spacex‐ceo
  17. Goldstein, J. A., Sastry, G., Musser, M., DiResta, R., Gentzel, M., & Sedova, K. (2023). Generative language models and automated influence operations: Emerging threats and potential mitigations. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04246
  18. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant fu‐ turistic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2(4), 100089.
  19. Hosseini, M., Gao, C. A., Liebovitz, D. M., Carvalho, A. M., Ahmad, F. S., Luo, Y., MacDonald, N., Holmes, K. L., & Kho, A. (2023, April 3). An exploratory survey abo‐ ut using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research. medRxiv, 3.
  20. Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2022). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.03629
  21. King, M. R., ChatGPT (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16(1), 1–2.
  22. Kirmani, A. R. (2022). Artificial intelligence—enabled science poetry. ACS Energy Letters, 8, 574–576.
  23. Launchbury, J. (2016, December 6). A DARPA perspective on artificial intelligence. DARPA. https://www.darpa.mil/attachments/AIFull.pdf
  24. LMSYS. (2023, May 25). Chatbot arena leaderboard updates. https://lmsys.org/blog/2023‐05‐25‐leaderboard/
  25. Lopez‐Lira, A., & Tang, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT forecast stock price movements? Return predictability and large language models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.07619
  26. Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News.
  27. Malone, T. W. (2018). Superminds: The surprising power of people and computers thinking together. Little, Brown Spark.
  28. Mayor, T. (2019). Ethics and automation: What to do when workers are displaced. MIT Management Sloan School. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas‐made‐to‐matter/ethics‐and‐automation‐what‐to‐do‐when‐workers‐are‐displaced
  29. McGee, R. W. (2023, April 8). Using artificial intelligence (AI) to compose a musical score for a taekwondo tournament routine: A ChatGPT experiment. Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11235.22569
  30. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.3781
  31. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.4546
  32. Motoki, F., Pinho Neto, V., & Rodrigues, V. (2023). More human than human: Measuring ChatGPT political bias. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4372349
  33. OpenAI & Pilipiszyn, A. (2021, March 25). GPT‐3 powers the next generation of apps. https://openai.com/blog/gpt‐3‐apps
  34. Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., Schulman, J., Hilton, J., Kelton, F., Miller, L., Simens, M., Askell, A., & Welinder, P. (2022). Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.02155.
  35. Patel, S. B., & Lam, K. (2023). ChatGPT: The future of discharge summaries? The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e107–e108.
  36. Paul, J., Ueno, A., & Dennis, C. (2023). ChatGPT and consumers: Benefits, pitfalls and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47( 4), 1213–1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12928
  37. Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. D. (2014). Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 1532–1543.
  38. Rivas, P., & Zhao, L. (2023). Marketing with ChatGPT: Navigating the ethical terra‐ in of GPT‐based chatbot technology. AI, 4(2), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai4020019
  39. Romero, A. (2021, June 21). Understanding GPT‐3 in 5 minutes. https://towardsdata‐science.com/understanding‐gpt‐3‐in‐5‐minutes‐7fe35c3a1e52
  40. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023, January 24). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
  41. Shen, Y., Heacock, L., Elias, J., Hentel, K. D., Reig, B., Shih, G., & Moy, L. (2023). ChatGPT and other large language models are double‐edged swords. Radiology, 307(2). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230163
  42. Thurzo, A., Strunga, M., Urban, R., Surovková, J., & Afrashtehfar, K. I. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on dental education: A review and guide for curriculum update. Education Sciences, 13(2), 150.
  43. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
  44. Weizenbaum, J. (1966). Eliza—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168
  45. Westerlund, M. (2019, November). The emergence of deepfake technology: A re‐ view. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(11), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1282
  46. Yang, Z., Li, L., Wang, J., Lin, K., Azarnasab, E., Ahmed, F., Liu, Z., Liu, C., Zeng, M., & Wang, L. (2023). MM-react: Prompting ChatGPT for multimodal reasoning and action. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.11381
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.2.736 | Journal eISSN: 2450-0097 | Journal ISSN: 2392-1641
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 70
Submitted on: Apr 26, 2023
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2023
Published on: Jul 26, 2023
Published by: Poznań University of Economics and Business Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Krzysztof Węcel, Marcin Sawiński, Milena Stróżyna, Włodzimierz Lewoniewski, Ewelina Księżniak, Piotr Stolarski, Witold Abramowicz, published by Poznań University of Economics and Business Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.