Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Absurda lex, sed lex? Public value and the decay of the Rule of Law: A conceptual perspective Cover

Absurda lex, sed lex? Public value and the decay of the Rule of Law: A conceptual perspective

Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. Adams, E. S., & Spaak, T. (1995). Fuzzifying the natural law—legal positivist debate. Buffalo Law Review, 43(1), 85–119.
  2. Adatia, N. (2022, June 7). Bees are legally fish in California, court rules. Here’s why and what led to it. The Sacramento Bee. Retrieved from https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/article262045952.html
  3. Agostino, M., Nifo, A., Trivieri, F., & Vecchione, G. (2020). Rule of law and regulatory quality as drivers of entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 54(6), 814–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1648785
  4. Alemán, I. (2009). La jurisdicción constitucional y la acción de tutela como control de constitucionalidad. Justicia Juris, 6(11), 45–64.
  5. Antonov, M. V. (2021). Formalism, decisionism, and conservatism in Russian law (Vol. 68). Koninklijke Brill NV.10.1163/9789004442580
  6. Bastiat, F. (2012). Le very best-of de Frédéric Bastiat. Versailles: Éditions Tulys.
  7. Beard, C. A. (1956). An economic interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. London: Macmillan.
  8. Bedner, A. (2010). An elementary approach to the Rule of Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2(01), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404510100037
  9. Bernstein, W. J. (2004). The birth of plenty: How the prosperity of the modern world was created. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
  10. Bernstein, W. J. (2008). A splendid exchange: How trade shaped the world. New York: Grove Press.
  11. Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Georgetown University Press.
  12. Brown, M. J. F., & Paxton, R. J. (2009). The conservation of bees: A global perspective. Apidologie, 40(3), 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009019
  13. Champeil-Desplats, V. (n.d.). L’idée de formalisme dans la pensée juridique française du XXe siècle. Cahiers de Méthodologie Juridique, 33(5), 1753–1768.
  14. Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1–44.
  15. Cole, M., & Parston, G. (2006). Unlocking Public Value: A new model for achieving high performance in public service organizations. New York: Wiley.
  16. Coumoundouros, A. (2006). Plato’s view of tyranny. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Duquesne University. Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/435
  17. Daly, T. G. (2019). Democratic decay: Conceptualising an emerging research field. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(1), 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00086-2
  18. Fallon, R. H. (1997). “The Rule of Law” as a concept in constitutional discourse. Columbia Law Review, 97(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123446
  19. Ferguson, N. (2012). The Great Degeneration. London: Penguin Books.
  20. Forbes. (2021, June 25). Con tutela Red de Veedurías Ciudadanas pide a Conmebol anular el partido Brasil vs. Colombia. Forbes Colombia. Retrieved from https://forbes.co/2021/06/25/negocios/deportes/con-tutela-red-de-veedurias-ciudadanas-pide-aconmebol-anular-el-partido-brasil-vs-colombia/
  21. Green, L., & Adams, T. (2019). Legal positivism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-positivism/
  22. Hadfield, G., & Weingast, B. R. (2013). Microfoundations of the Rule of Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2342882
  23. Haggard, S., & Tiede, L. (2011). The Rule of Law and economic growth: Where are we?. World Development, 39(5), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.10.007
  24. Hamburger, P. (2014). Is administrative law unlawful?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226116457.001.0001
  25. Hayek, F. A. (1953/2019). The decline of the Rule of Law. Mises Institute. Retrieved from https://mises.org/library/decline-rule-law
  26. Hertwig, R. (2006). Do legal rules rule behavior?. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press—Dahlem University Press.
  27. Holmes, O. W. (1881). The common law. London: Macmillan.
  28. Holmes, O. W. (1899). The theory of legal interpretation. Harvard Law Review, 12(1), 471–420.10.2307/1321531
  29. Horwitz, M. J. (1971). The emergence of and instrumental conception of American law, 1780‒1820. In Perspectives in American history (vol. 5, p. 287). Charles Warren Center for Studies in American History: Harvard University.
  30. Jackson, B. S. (1983). On the tyranny of the law. Israel Law Review, 18(3–4), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700008037
  31. Kantongericht Basel. (2007). Übertriebener Formalismus (Kantongericht Basel i.S. Gegen T.V. 100 07 526/ZWH). Retrieved from https://www.baselland.ch/politik-und-behorden/gerichte/rechtsprechung/kantonsgericht/chronologische-anordnung/2007/22
  32. Katz, D. M., Coupette, C., Beckedorf, J., & Hartung, D. (2020). Complex societies and the growth of the law. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 18737. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73623-x
  33. Kaufman, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. (World Bank—Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430).
  34. Kelsen, H. (1945). General theory of law and state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  35. Kelsen, H. (2008). Reine Rechtslehre: Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik: Studienausg. der 1. Aufl. 1934 (1. Aufl). J.C.B. Mohr.
  36. King, M. L. (1963). Letter from Birmingham jail. Retrieved from https://letterfromjail.com/
  37. Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (2003). The economic structure of intellectual property law. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
  38. Larson, A. (2022, June 10). Bees aren’t fish, but it’s good that a California court thinks they are. NBC News. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/california-court-ruling-bees-are-fish-bad-logic-good-humans-rcna32971
  39. Legal Information Institute. (2022). Chevron deference. Cornell Law School—Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/chevron_deference
  40. Lindgreen, A., Koenig-Lewis, N., Kitchener, M., Brewer, J. D., Moore, M. H., & Meynhardt, T. (Eds.). (2019). Public Value: Deepening, enriching, and broadening the theory and practice. London: Routledge.
  41. Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2003). Communicating statistical DNA evidence. Jurimetrics, 43(1), 147–163.
  42. Locke, J. (n.d.). Concerning civil government, second essay. An essay concerning the true original extent and end of civil government. Writings Home. Retrieved from http://www.writingshome.com/ebook_files/2146.pdf
  43. Lozano Rodríguez, F., Muñoz Muñoz, C. F., & González Martínez, E. (2020). La tutela del derecho a la salud mental en época de pandemia. Opinión Jurídica, 19(40), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v19n40a18
  44. Luhmann, N., Ziegert, K. A., & Kastner, F. (2008). Law as a social system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  45. Luong, T. T. H., Nguyen, T. M., & Nguyen, T. A. N. (2020). Rule of Law, economic growth and shadow economy in transition countries. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(4), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO4.145
  46. Mandralevis, P. (2006, June 19). Αpografes. Kathimerini. Retrieved from https://www.kathimerini.gr/opinion/702887/apografes-37/
  47. Marcus Aurelius. (2017). Meditationes—Selbstbetrachtungen. Suavis.
  48. Mazzucato, M. (2019). The value of everything: Making and taking in the global economy. London: Penguin Books.
  49. Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public Value inside: What is public value creation?. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732632
  50. Meynhardt, T. (2021). Public Value is knowable, Public Value creation is not. Administration & Society, 53(10), 1631–1642. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211053500
  51. Mirkine-Guétzévitch, B. (1949). Les méthodes d’étude du droit constitutionnel comparé. Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, 1(4), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.3406/ridc.1949.18889
  52. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  53. Moore, M. H. (2014). Public Value accounting: Establishing the philosophical basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12198
  54. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  55. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  56. North, D. C. (1992). Transaction costs, institutions, and economic performance. ICS Press.
  57. North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832.10.1017/S0022050700009451
  58. O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to Public Value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366.10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x
  59. Pech, L. (2022). The Rule of Law as a well-established and well-defined principle of EU law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00176-8
  60. Pech, L., & Scheppele, K. L. (2017). Illiberalism within: Rule of Law backsliding in the EU. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19, 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2017.9
  61. Pirie, F. (2022). Rule of Laws: A 4000-year quest to order the world. London: Profile Books.
  62. Pistor, K. (2019). The code of capital: How the law creates wealth and inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  63. Posner, R. A. (1973). Economic analysis of law. Boston: Little Brown.
  64. Posner, R. A. (1986). Legal formalism, legal realism, and the interpretation of statutes and the Constitution. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 37(2), 179–217.
  65. Pozzolo, S. (2018). Neoconstitucionalismo y positivismo jurídico. Palestra Editores.
  66. Prebble, M. (2018). Is “we” singular? The nature of Public Value. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016671427
  67. PRS Group. (2021). The ICRG Methodology.
  68. Quevedo, S. M. (1985). Formalist and instrumentalist legal reasoning and legal theory. California Law Review, 73(1), 119‒157. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480465
  69. Reid, J. P. (2004). Rule of law: The jurisprudence of liberty in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University.
  70. Robinson, M., & McDowell, E. (2020, June 23). The most ridiculous law in every state. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/weird-state-laws-across-america-2018-1?op=1
  71. Rogge, O. J. (1960). The rule of law. American Bar Association Journal, 46(9), 981–986.
  72. Roig, R. de A. (2006). Sobre el concepto de Estado de Derecho. Ius et Veritas, 33, 324–331.
  73. Sancino, A., Rees, J., & Schindele, I. (2018). Cross-sector collaboration for Public Value co-creation: A critical analysis. In M. Stout (Ed.), Critical perspectives on international public sector management (vol. 6, pp. 59–73). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2045-794420180000006003
  74. Scheuerman, W. E. (2020). The end of law: Carl Schmitt in the twenty-first century (2nd ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  75. Schmidt, T. P. (2022). Judicial minimalism in the lower courts. Virginia Law Review, 108(4), 829–913.
  76. Schmitt, C. (1932). Der Begriff des Politischen. Duncker & Humblot.
  77. Simon, H. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.
  78. Simovic, M. (2020). Deficit in the Rule of Law as an institutional phenomenon in the countries of Southeast Europe. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19(2), 171‒181.
  79. Skaaning, S. E. (2010). Measuring the Rule of Law. Political Research Quarterly, 63(2), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909346745
  80. Smith, A., & Stewart, D. (1982). Essays on philosophical subjects. Liberty Classics.
  81. Somin, I. (2022, May 31). California court rules bees qualify as “fish” under the State’s Endangered Species Act. Reason. The Volokh Conspiracy. Retrieved from https://reason.com/volokh/2022/05/31/california-court-rules-bees-qualify-as-fish-under-the-states-endangered-species-act/
  82. Sweeney, R. (2018). Constitutional conflicts in the European Union: Court packing in Poland versus the United States. Economics and Business Review, 4(4), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2018.4.1
  83. Tepedino, V. J. (1979). The importance of bees and other insect pollinators in maintaining floral species composition. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs, 3, 139–150.
  84. Thomas, R. (2022, May 31). Cal app Channels Dickens’ Mr. Bumble: Bumblebees are fish under Cal’s Endangered Species Act. Inverse Condemnation. Retrieved from https://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/2022/05/cal-app-bumblebees-are-fish-under-cals-endangered-species-act.html
  85. Thür, G. (2015). Transaction costs in Athenian law. In D. P. Kehoe, D. M. Ratzan, & U. Yiftach-Firanko (Eds.), Law and transaction costs in the ancient economy (pp. 36–50). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  86. Tsourdi, E. L. (2021). Asylum in the EU: One of the many faces of Rule of law backsliding?. European Constitutional Law Review, 17(3), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000250
  87. Twining, W. (1973). Bad man revisited. Cornell Law Review, 58(1), 275‒301.
  88. Veblen, T. (2003). The theory of the leisure class. Penn State Electronic Classics Series.
  89. Vermeule, A. (2020, March 31). Beyond originalism. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/common-good-constitutionalism/609037/
  90. Vermeule, A. (2022). Common Good Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  91. White, M. (1961). The revolt against formalism (3rd ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.
  92. World Justice Project. (2021). The World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2021. Retrieved from https://worldjusticeproject.org/sites/default/files/documents/WJP-INDEX-21.pdf
  93. Zerbe, R. O. Jr., & Bellas, A. S. (2006). A primer for benefit-cost analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2022.3.2 | Journal eISSN: 2450-0097 | Journal ISSN: 2392-1641
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 26
Submitted on: Jul 22, 2022
Accepted on: Sep 7, 2022
Published on: Oct 29, 2022
Published by: Poznań University of Economics and Business Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Erick Behar-Villegas, published by Poznań University of Economics and Business Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.