Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fostering sustainable development through the European Digital Single Market Cover

Fostering sustainable development through the European Digital Single Market

By: Ewa Latoszek  
Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. Alves, E. E. C., & Biancarelli, A. M. (2020). Financial cooperation initiatives in Latin America: Conditions of origins, subsistence and eventual vanishing. Economics and Business Review, 20(4), 51-71. doi:10.18559/ebr.2020.4.410.18559/ebr.2020.4.4
  2. Azmanova, A., & Pallemaerts, M. (Eds.) (2006). The European Union and sustainable development. Internal and external dimensions. Brussels: Brussels University Press.
  3. Bainbridge, W. S., & Roco, M. C. (2016). Science and technology convergence: With emphasis for nanotechnology-inspired convergence. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(7), 2-19. doi:10.1007/s11051-016-3520-010.1007/s11051-016-3520-0
  4. Barbier, E., Markandya, A., & Pearce, D. W. (1990). Environmental sustainability and cost-benefit analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 22(9), 1259-1266.10.1068/a221259
  5. Barlett, P. F., & Chase, G. W. (Eds.) (2013). Sustainability in higher education: Stories and strategies for transformation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9418.001.0001
  6. Bayer, F., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, Ch., Itúrbide, A., Irribarren-Maestro, I., Reding, S. (2019). Investigating SSH research and publication practices in disciplinary and institutional contexts. A survey-based comparative approach in two universities. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 4, 1-18.10.3389/frma.2019.00001
  7. Bexell, M., & Jönsson, K. (2017). Responsibility and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 13-29.10.1080/08039410.2016.1252424
  8. Boas, I., Biermann, F., & Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: Towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 449-464.10.1007/s10784-016-9321-1
  9. Bolcárová, P., & Kološta, S. (2015). Assessment of sustainable development in the EU 27 using aggregated SD Index. Ecological Indicators, 48, 699-705.10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.001
  10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  11. COM. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions European Data Strategy 66 final/10.03.2020. Brussels.
  12. Council of the European Union. (2020). Council Conclusions of 8 October 2020 on “Access to justice—harnessing the opportunities offered by digitalization”. Brussels.
  13. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advance mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  14. Damioli, G., & Vértesy, D. (2020). The innovation output indicator 2019. JRC Technical Reports. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  15. DEF. (2016). Digital empowerment foundation. Retrieved from http://defindia.org/
  16. Diaconaşu, D. E., Crupenschi, V. M., & Pohoață, I. (2020). The sustainable development theory: A critical approach (vol. 1: The discourse of the founders). New York: Palgrave McMillan.
  17. Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast). Text with EEA relevance.
  18. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2000/31/EC of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce).
  19. Dollar, D., Kleineberg, T., & Kraay, A. (2013). Growth still is good for the poor. (Policy Research Working Paper No. 6568). The Macroeconomics and Growth Team, Development Research Group. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.10.1596/1813-9450-6568
  20. Domorenok, E. (2019). Governing sustainability in the EU. From political discourse to policy practices. Abington & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315315003
  21. Duch-Brown, N., & Martens, B. (2016). The economic impact of removing geo-blocking restrictions in the EU Digital Single Market. (Digital Economy Working Paper No.2016/02). Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre.10.2139/ssrn.2783647
  22. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100.10.2307/41165746
  23. ENISA. (2017). Overview on the implementation and uptake of trust services: One year after the switch over. European Union Agency for Network and Information Security.
  24. European Commission. (2015a). Why we need a Digital Single Market. Retrieved June 20, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/dsm-fact-sheet_en.pdf
  25. European Commission. (2015b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and to the Committee of the Regions. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0192&from=EN
  26. European Commission. (2015c). Europe’s Digital Single Market. Brussels, COM (2015), 192.
  27. European Commission. (2018a). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Digital Europe Programme for the period 2021−2027. Explanatory memorandum 306 final. Brussels.
  28. European Commission. (2018b). Digital Single Market 2018, High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/high-level-expert-group-artificial-intelligence
  29. European Commission. (2020a). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Methodological Note. Retrieved June 6, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi
  30. European Commission. (2020b). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  31. European Parliament. (2017). Civil law rules on robotics. European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.pdf
  32. Giffi, C. (Ed.) (2019, July). Looking ahead. Staying ahead. Organizational transformation. Cyber. Future of mobility. Technology & Society, Deloitte Review, 25.
  33. Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 433-44810.1007/s10784-016-9323-z
  34. Hák, T., Janousková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
  35. Hemmati, H., Dodds, F., & Enayati, J. (2002). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability. Beyond deadlock and conflict. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd London.
  36. Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: Our common future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26(1), 130-139.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006
  37. Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary General. (2019). Global sustainable development report: The future is now—Science for achieving sustainable development. New York: UN. Retrieved September 10, 2020 from https://sustain-abledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/24797GSDR_report_2019.pdf
  38. Jejdling, F. (2019, June). Ericsson mobility report. Retrieved June 18, 2020 from https://www.ericsson.com/assets/local/mobility-report/documents/2019/ericsson-mobility-report-june-2019.pdf
  39. Komiyama, K. H., & Takeuchi, K. (2006). Sustainability science: Building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1.10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4
  40. Krämer, J., Senellart, P., & de Streel, A. (2020). Making data portability more effective for the digital economy. Economic implications and regulatory challenges. Report. Brussels: CERRE.
  41. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433.10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x
  42. Lin, J. Y. (2012). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.10.1596/978-0-8213-8955-3
  43. Mărcuț, M. (2017). Crystalizing the EU digital policy. An exploration into the Digital Single Market. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-69227-2
  44. Mărcuț, M. (2019). Building a stronger Europe—Governing the Digital Single Market. In A. Adamczyk, M. Dziembała, A. Kłos & M. Pachocka (Eds.), EU facing current challenges, opportunities & conflicts (pp. 50-61). Warszawa: Dom Wydawniczy Elipsa.
  45. Matusiak, M., Stancova, K. C., Dosso, M., Daniels, C., & Miedzenski, M. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for SDGs roadmaps. Background paper: Overview of the existing STI for SDGs roadmapping methodologies. New York: UN.
  46. Miedzinski, M., Kanehira, N., Cervantes, M., Mealy, S., Kotani, R., & Bollati E. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for SDGs Roadmaps—Background Paper: International STI collaboration and investment for Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/269391_BP_Roadmaps_IntlCollaberation_final_7_09_20.pdf
  47. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Open Medicine, 3(3), 123-130. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.00510.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
  48. Mulder, P., & van Bergh, J. (2001, winter). Evolutionary economics theories of sustainable development. A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy, 32(1), 101-134.10.1111/0017-4815.00152
  49. OECD. (2015). OECD DSTI/STP/MIN(2015)1, Meeting of the OECD Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy at Ministerial Level: Creating our common future through science, technology and innovation. 20-21 October 2015, Daejeon. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/sti-ministerial-2015.html
  50. Paris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559-586.10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551
  51. Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., … & Duffy S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
  52. Redclift, M. (1993). Sustainable development: Needs, values, rights. Environmental Values, 2(1), 3-20. doi:10.3197/09632719377667998110.3197/096327193776679981
  53. Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G,, & Fuller, G. (2019). Sustainable development report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).
  54. Scholte, J. A., & Söderbaum, F. (2017). A changing global development agenda?. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 1-12. doi:10.1080/08039410.2017.127584310.1080/08039410.2017.1275843
  55. Scott, J. M., Petropoulos, G., & Yeung, T. (2019). Contribution to growth: The European Digital Single Market. Delivering economic benefits for citizens and businesses. Luxembourg: European Parliament.
  56. Stiglitz, J. (2019). People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. London: Penguin UK.
  57. Stone, A. (2017). These 17 goals have a triple bottom line. Retrieved October 14, 2020 from https://ecopreserve.net/sdg/
  58. Streel de, A. (2019). The future of the digital market. Brussels: CERRE.
  59. The World in 2050. (2019). The digital revolution and sustainable development: Opportunities and challenges. Report prepared by The World in 2050 initiative. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
  60. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. (2015). New York: United Nations. Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  61. UN. (2020). The sustainable development goals report 2019. New York: United Nations.
  62. UN Environment. (2020, March 3). Coronavirus outbreak highlights need to address threats to ecosystems and wildlife. Retrieved January 18, 2021 from https://www.unenvironment.org/news-andstories/story/coronavirusoutbreak-highlights-need-address-threats-ecosystemsand-wildlife
  63. Young, O. R. (1997). Global Governance: Drawing insights from the environmental experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2021.1.5 | Journal eISSN: 2450-0097 | Journal ISSN: 2392-1641
Language: English
Page range: 68 - 89
Submitted on: Dec 4, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 18, 2021
Published on: Apr 27, 2021
Published by: Poznań University of Economics and Business Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Ewa Latoszek, published by Poznań University of Economics and Business Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.