Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Germany’s attitude towards the enlargement of the eurozone Cover

Germany’s attitude towards the enlargement of the eurozone

Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. Alami, I., & Dixon, A. D. (2020). State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversies. Competition & Change, 24(1), 70-94. doi:10.1177/102452941988194910.1177/1024529419881949
  2. Amable, B. (2004). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Baldwin, R. (2006). The euro’s trade effects. (ECB Working Paper No. 594).10.2139/ssrn.886260
  4. Belke, A. von Schnurbein. (2012). European monetary policy and the ECB rotation model: Voting power of the core versus the periphery. Public Choice, 1-2(151), 289-323.10.1007/s11127-010-9748-9
  5. Blesse, S., Havlik, A., & Heinemann, F. (2019). Searching for a euro reform consensus: The perspective from Central and Eastern Europe. Mannheim: Leibniz Association.
  6. Bloomberg. (2020). Euro-area governments set out competing plans for virus aid. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-01/european-commission-proposes-state-wage-support-program
  7. BMWi. (2019a). Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 2019. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.
  8. BMWi. (2019b). Perspektiven für ein Wirtschaftlich Starkes Europa. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.
  9. BMWi. (2020). Fakten zum Deutschen Außenhandel 2019. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.
  10. Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery—go. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  11. Böttger, K., & Jopp, M. (2017). Fundamentals of German European policy. German European Policy Series, 1(17).
  12. Brezinski, H. (2019). The euro—a German perspective. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 66. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2019-003410.47743/saeb-2019-0034
  13. Brunnermeier, M. K., James, H., & Landau, J.-P. (2016). The euro and the battle of ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc774qh
  14. Bulmer, S. (2014). Germany and the eurozone crisis: Between hegemony and domestic politics. West European Politics, 37(6), 1244-1263. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.92933310.1080/01402382.2014.929333
  15. Bundesfinanzministerium. (2018). Bewegung ins Europäische Projekt bringen. Interview mit dem Bundesfinanzminister Olaf Scholz. Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, 15.04.2018. Pressearchiv Online. Retrieved March 10, 2021 from https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Interviews/2018/2018-04-15-faz-sonntag.html
  16. Bundesregierung, die. (2011). Regierungserklärung von Kanzlerin Merkel zum Europäischen Rat und zum Eurogipfel 10.11.2011. Bundesregierung-Archiv. Retrieved March 10, 2021 from https://archiv.bundesregierung.de/archiv-de/dokumente/regierungserklaerung-von-kanzlerin-merkel-zum-europaeischen-rat-und-zum-eurogipfel-1007728
  17. Busch, A. (2006). German politics globalisation and national varieties of capitalism: The contested viability of the ‘German model’. German Politics, 125-139. doi:10.1080/0964400050015394810.1080/09644000500153948
  18. Cienski, J. (2016, June 28). Poland mourns Brexit. Politico.
  19. Dabrowski, M., & Rostowski, J. (2006). The eastern enlargement of the eurozone. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/b136026
  20. Dandashly, A., & Verdun, A. (2018). Euro adoption in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland: Laggards by default and Laggards by choice Oa. Comparative European Politics, 16(3), 385-412. doi:10.1057/cep.2015.4610.1057/cep.2015.46
  21. Darvas, Z., & Szapáry, G. (2008). Euro area enlargement and euro adoption strategies. (IEHAS Discussion Papers No. 24).
  22. Dellas, H., & Tavlas, G. S. (2009). An optimum-currency-area odyssey. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(7), 1117-1137. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.06.00110.1016/j.jimonfin.2009.06.001
  23. Destatis. (2020). Außenhandel: Rangfolge der Handelspartner im Außenhandel der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Statistisches Bundesamt.
  24. Dyson, K., & Featherstone, K. (1999). The road to Maastricht: Negotiating economic and monetary union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019829638X.001.0001
  25. Dyson, K., & Sepos, A. (2010). Differentiation as design principle and as tool in the political management of European integration. In K. Dyson, & A. Sepos (Eds.), Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration (pp. 3-23). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  26. EBRD. (2020). Transition report 2020-21: The state strikes back.
  27. Eichengreen, B. (2014, March 3). The eurozone crisis: The theory of optimum currency areas bites back.
  28. Euractiv.de. (2014, June 19). ECB voting rights ‘rotation’ raises fears in Germany. Retrieved March 10, 2020 from https://www.euractiv.com/section/euro-finance/news/ecb-voting-rights-rotation-raises-fears-in-germany
  29. European Commission. (2017). President Jean-Claude Juncker’s state of the Union Address 2017. Retrieved November 23, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_17_3165
  30. European Commission. (2020a, June). Convergence report 2020. (European Economy Institutional Paper No. 129). doi:10.2765/508213
  31. European Commission. (2020b). Introduction of the euro in the Member States that have not yet adopted the common currency: May-June 2020. Brussels.
  32. European Council. (2016). European Council meeting (18 and 19 February 2016)—Conclusions. Brussels.
  33. Eurostat. (2020a). Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at market prices—annual data. Retrieved December 7, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tipsau10/default/table?lang=en
  34. Eurostat. (2020b). Net international investment position: Quarterly data, per cent of GDP. Retrieved December 6, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tipsii40/default/table?lang=en
  35. Fabry, A. (2019). The political economy of Hungary: From state capitalism to authoritarian neoliberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-10594-5
  36. Festoc, F., L’Oeillet, G., & Roudaut, N. (2017). Would CEEC international trade be higher with the euro? Evidence from sectoral data. Revue d’Études Comparatives Est-Ouest, 3-4, 247-275.10.3917/receo.483.0247
  37. Gábor, J. (2020). Impact of Brexit on voting power in Council of the European Union. Open Political Science, 3(1), 192-197. doi:10.1515/openps-2020-001610.1515/openps-2020-0016
  38. Groszkowski, J. (2011). Slovakia: The Eurogroup’s enfant terrible. OSW-Commentary, 18.20.2011.
  39. Halas, M. (2018). A model disagreement: The fall of the Slovak government during the eurozone crisis in 2011. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(9), 1472-1495. doi:10.1080/0 9668136.2018.1515347
  40. Hall, P. A. (2018). Varieties of capitalism in light of the euro crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 7-30. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.131027810.1080/13501763.2017.1310278
  41. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.) (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199247757.001.0001
  42. Hancké, B. (Ed.) (2009). Debating varieties of capitalism: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  43. Heinemann, F., Osterloh, S., & Kalb, A. (2014). Sovereign risk premia: The link between fiscal rules and stability culture. Journal of International Money and Finance, 41, 110-127. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.11.00210.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.11.002
  44. Hillebrand, R. (2015). Germany and its eurozone crisis policy: The impact of the country’s ordoliberal heritage. German Politics and Society, 33(1), 6-24. doi:10.3167/gps.2015.33010210.3167/gps.2015.330102
  45. Hobolt, S. B. (2014). Ever closer or ever wider? Public attitudes towards further enlargement and integration in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(5), 664-680. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.89774610.1080/13501763.2014.897746
  46. Horvath, J. (2011). Optimum currency area theory: A selective review. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.101548010.2139/ssrn.1015480
  47. Howarth, D., & Rommerskirchen, C. (2013). A panacea for all times? The German stability culture as strategic political resource. West European Politics, 36(4), 750-770. doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.78335510.1080/01402382.2013.783355
  48. Howarth, D., & Schild, J. (2021). Nein to ‘Transfer Union’: The German brake on the construction of a European Union fiscal capacity. Journal of European Integration, 43(2), 207-224. doi:10.1080/07036337.2021.187769010.1080/07036337.2021.1877690
  49. Hüttmann, M. G. (2021). Leitbilder Deutscher Europapolitik. In K. Böttger & M. Jopp (Eds.), Handbuch zur deutschen Europapolitik (pp. 31-45). Baden-Baden: Nomos.10.5771/9783748909514-31
  50. IMF. (2015). Central and Eastern Europe: New Member States Policy Forum 2014. (International Monetary Fund Country Report No. 15/98).10.5089/9781484321393.002
  51. Iversen, T., Soskice, D., & Hope, D. (2016). The eurozone and political economic institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 163-185.10.1146/annurev-polisci-022615-113243
  52. Jasiecki, K. (2017). The nature of capitalism in Poland. Controversy over the economy since the end of 2015: The prospects of business elite and employer associations. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 8(3), 171-193.
  53. Johnston, A., & Regan, A. (2016). European monetary integration and the incompatibility of national varieties of capitalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 318-336. doi:10.1111/jcms.1228910.1111/jcms.12289
  54. Juneja, J. (2017). How Germany benefits the most from its eurozone membership. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1074-1088. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.04210.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.042
  55. Kiohos, A., & Stoupos, N. (2018). Re-exploring the enlargement of the eurozone: Evidence from the new Member-States. International Economic Journal, 32(2), 177-198. doi:10.1080/10168737.2018.148064610.1080/10168737.2018.1480646
  56. Klein, J., Plottka, J., & Tittel, A. (2018). Der Neustart der Europäischen Integration durch eine inklusive Avantgarde?. Integration, 41(2), 141-168. doi:10.5771/0720-5120-2018-2-14110.5771/0720-5120-2018-2-141
  57. Kleinowski, M. (2019). The impact of Brexit on the voting power in the Council of the European Union. Przegląd Europejski, 4, 95-117. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0013.345610.5604/01.3001.0013.3456
  58. Kowalski, T. (2021). The post-2015 institutional shock in Poland: Some empirical findings. CESifo Forum, 22(1), 43-48.
  59. Krugman, P. (2012). Revenge of the optimum currency area. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 27(1), 439-448. doi:10.1086/66918810.1086/669188
  60. Mihm von, A., & Mussler, W. (2020, July 17). Weshalb Bulgarien und Kroatien noch immer EU-Wackelkandidaten Sind. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.
  61. Mody, A. (2018). EuroTragedy: A drama in nine acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199351381.001.0001
  62. Morawiecki, M. (2016, October 16). The Polish case for less economic liberalism. Politico.
  63. Musacchio, A., & Lazzarini, S. G. (2014). Reinventing state capitalism. Leviathan in business, Brazil and beyond. Cambridge, London: Oxford University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674419582
  64. Myant, M., & Drahokoupil, J. (2015). Varieties of capitalism in transition economies. In M. Ebenau, I. Bruff & C. May (Eds.), New directions in critical comparative capitalisms (pp. 155-171). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  65. Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670-702. doi:10.1017/S004388710999009810.1017/S0043887109990098
  66. Ondarza von, N. (2013). “Auf dem Weg zur Union in der Union. Institutionelle Auswirkungen der differenzierten Integration in der Eurozone auf die EU. Integration, 36(1), 17-33.
  67. Pérez, S. A. (2019). A Europe of creditor and debtor states: Explaining the north / south divide in the eurozone. West European Politics, 42(5), 989-1014. doi:10.1080/0140 2382.2019.1573403
  68. Petersen, T., Böhmer, M., & Stein vom, H. (2013). How Germany benefits from the euro in economic. Policy Brief Bertelsmann Stiftung, 1.
  69. Rapacki, R. (Ed.) (2019). Diversity of patchwork capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
  70. Reuters. (2017a). Euro zone enlargement call sparks backlash in Germany. Retrieved October 25, 2020 from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-eurozone-enlargement-idUSKCN1BQ2IJ
  71. Reuters. (2017b, September 13). Juncker’s EU Plan is largely in line with Germany’s vision: Schaeuble. Reuters.
  72. Sandbu, M. (2015). Europe’s orphan: The future of the euro and the politics of debt. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  73. Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D., & Rittberger, B. (2015). The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: Interdependence, politicization and differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 764-782. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.102083510.1080/13501763.2015.1020835
  74. Schimmelfennig, F., & Winzen, T. (2020). Ever looser Union?: Differentiated European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198854333.001.0001
  75. Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. Business, labor and challenges of equitable development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107300446
  76. Schoeller, M. G. (2020). Germany, the problem of leadership, and Institution-building in EMU reform. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 23(3), 309-324. doi:10.1080/17487870.2018.154141010.1080/17487870.2018.1541410
  77. Schoeller, M. G., & Karlsson, O. (2021). Championing the ‘German Model’? Germany’s consistent preferences on the integration of fiscal constraints. Journal of European Integration, 43(2), 191-206. doi:10.1080/07036337.2021.187769710.1080/07036337.2021.1877697
  78. Sinn, H.-W. (2020). The economics of target balances. From Lehmann to Corona. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-50170-9
  79. Skouras, T. (2019). On a low-competitiveness country joining the eurozone: Are there lessons from Greece?. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.336553210.2139/ssrn.3365532
  80. Sørensen, C. (2020). Three reasons why Denmark could transform its relationship with the EU. European Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from https://ecfr.eu/article/three-reasons-why-denmark-could-transform-its-relationship-with-the-u/
  81. Sperber, N. (2019). The many lives of state capitalism: From classical Marxism to free-market advocacy. History of the Human Sciences, 32(3), 100-124. doi:10.1177/095269511881555310.1177/0952695118815553
  82. Spiegel, P., Peel, Q., Barker, A., & Pignal, S. (2011, December 9). Britain’s cold shoulder for Europe. Financial Times.
  83. Steen, M. (2012, September 6). Weidmann isolated as ECB plan approved. Financial Times.
  84. Tokarski, P., & Funk, S. (2018, December). Die Nicht-Euro-Staaten in der EU nach dem Brexit. SWP-Aktuell, 68.
  85. Visvizi, A., & Tokarski, P. (2014). Poland and the euro: Between lock-in and unfinished transition. Society and Economy, 36(4), 445-468. doi:10.1556/SocEc.36.2014.4.110.1556/SocEc.36.2014.4.1
  86. Visvizi, A., & Tokarski, P. (2018). Poland and the re-categorization of the eurozone entry: From a legal obligation to a political issue. Law in Eastern Europe, 67, 113-133. doi:10.1163/9789004352070_00910.1163/9789004352070_009
  87. Zank, W. (2019). Insufficient data, short time spans, illusions and multiple pressures: Designing the German Monetary Union in 1990. Economics and Business Review, 5(1), 53-78. doi:10.18559/ebr.2019.1.410.18559/ebr.2019.1.4
  88. Zhang, X., & Walter, A. (2012). East Asian capitalism: Diversity, continuity, and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1142/8505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2021.1.4 | Journal eISSN: 2450-0097 | Journal ISSN: 2392-1641
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 67
Submitted on: Jan 10, 2021
Accepted on: Mar 18, 2021
Published on: Apr 27, 2021
Published by: Poznań University of Economics and Business Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Sebastian Płóciennik, published by Poznań University of Economics and Business Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.