Skip to main content

Parliamentary Supremacy versus Judicial SupremacyHow can adversarial judicial, public, and political dialogue be institutionalised? Cover

Parliamentary Supremacy versus Judicial SupremacyHow can adversarial judicial, public, and political dialogue be institutionalised?

Utrecht Law Review

Volume 12 (2016): Issue 1

By: Veit Bader

Open Access

|Oct 2016

Download Article

Download the full article as a PDF file.

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.364 | Journal eISSN: 1871-515X

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 159 - 183

Published on: Oct 10, 2016

Published by: Utrecht University School of Law

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

judicial review in political philosophy,

comparative constitutionalism,

Canada and Europe,

new forms of cooperation,

competition and dialogue between courts and parliaments

© 2016 Veit Bader, published by Utrecht University School of Law
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 12 (2016): Issue 1

Previous article