
The Proliferation of Constitutional Law and Constitutional Adjudication, or How American Judicial Review Came to Europe After All
Abstract
This article submits that the continental European (Kelsenian) model of constitutional adjudication is affected, if not undermined, by the proliferation of constitutional adjudication outside centralized constitutional courts, due to 'globalization' in the European context, which results in a dispersion of constitutional adjudication that bears some of the traits of American judicial review. This contribution focuses on the institutional implications this has for the position and legitimacy of courts and constitutional adjudication by both national and European courts, and for the dynamics of their mutual relations. These implications and dynamics, it is submitted, are in some important respects different from the manner in which globalization plays out in American courts.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.223 | Journal eISSN: 1871-515X
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 35
Published on: Mar 25, 2013
Published by: Utrecht University School of Law
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2013 Leonard F.M. Besselink, published by Utrecht University School of Law
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.