Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Toward a postcapitalist feminist political ecology’ approach to the commons and commoning Cover

Toward a postcapitalist feminist political ecology’ approach to the commons and commoning

Open Access
|May 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1:

Postcapitalist community economies’ approach to commoning.

figures/ijc2019-2019028_fx_1.jpg
figures/ijc2019-2019028_fig_001.jpg
Figure 1:

The location of Milpa Maguey.

Table 2:

Commoning performed by the cooperative members.

AccessUseBenefitCareResponsibilityProperty
BiophysicalCooperative members, households, native species of plants, insectsCooperative members, their family members (plot allocation, organic methods)Cooperative members, their family, community members, future generations, nonhuman species and regional atmosphereCooperative members, the head of households, state, NGO, technical school, universities, nonhuman species and insectsCooperative members, their family, community members, community authoritiesIndividually owned private (e.g. family plots, seeds)
Collectively owned private (e.g. cooperative, ejido);
Open access (e.g. insects);
State
KnowledgeCooperative members, their family, peasants, NGOs, technical schools and universitiesCooperative, household members, supported by external actorsCooperative, households, peasants, future generations and nonhuman species. Widely distributed to a communityCooperative members, peasants, community members, community authorities, school children, NGOs, technical schools and universitiesCooperative, households, community membersCollectively owned private (e.g. cooperative, technical school and universities);
Private (e.g. HHs);
State
CulturalA: Syrup recipe shared by Individual recipe holders, cooperative;
B: Otomi shared by community members
A: Cooperative;
B: Community members, cooperative members, community authorities, school and state
A: Cooperative members, their family and consumers;
B: Community members, future generations and nonhuman species and regional atmosphere
A: Cooperative members and technical school;
B. Cooperative members, community members, school and state
A: Cooperative;
B: Community members, cooperative members, community authorities and state
A: Collectively owned private (e.g. cooperative, technical school);
Private (e.g. HHs)
B: Open access (Otomi)
SocialA: Cooperative; shared by cooperative members;
B: On-site childcare, money commons and mano vuelta shared by cooperative members;
C: Inter-community water supply system shared by 8 communities
A: Cooperative supported by external actors;
B: Cooperative members;
C: 8 communities through the assembly
A: Cooperative members, their family and consumers, peasants, future generations and nonhuman species. Widely distributed to a community
B: Cooperative members, their family, community members;
C: Members of 8 communities
A: Cooperative, their family, external actors;
B: Cooperative members and their family;
C: Community members (households, private businesses) through faena
A: Cooperative;
B: Cooperative members;
C: The community assembly – elected by 8 communities
A and C: Collectively owned private (e.g. cooperative, ejido, technical school and universities)
Private (Member HHs);
C: Collectively owned private (8 communities)

Adopted from Gibson-Graham et al. (2013).

Source: survey, interviews, and FGDs, 2012–2015.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.933 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: May 7, 2019
Published by: Uopen Journals
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Chizu Sato, Jozelin María Soto Alarcón, published by Uopen Journals
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.