Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The effects of social norms on motivation crowding: experimental evidence from the Tibetan Plateau Cover

The effects of social norms on motivation crowding: experimental evidence from the Tibetan Plateau

Open Access
|Apr 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1:

Qinghai survey questions.

1.I believe that most people in this group of four people doing this experiment right now are willing to join a team to remove traps. (PDN1)
2.Most people in this group approve of giving our time to remove traps. (PIN2)
3.The majority of nomads in my township think that giving time to remove traps is an important thing to do. (PIN)
4.The other three members of this group would disapprove of me if I didn’t join the team to remove traps. (PIN)
5.The majority of people in this group would be on a team to remove traps. (PDN)
6.The majority of people in this group think that giving time to patrol with a team and remove traps is an important thing to do. (PIN)
7.Most people in this group will give their time to patrol with a team to remove traps. (PDN)
8.I believe that most nomads in my township approve of giving our time to remove traps. (PDN)
9.The majority of people in this group would work with a team to remove traps from the landscape. (PDN)
I usually sacrifice my self-interest for the benefit of others. (GO3)
10.It is important for me to maintain harmony with others. (GO)
11.To me, pleasure is spending time with others. (GO)
12.I feel good when I cooperate with others. (GO)
13.My work as a nomad is an important part of how I see myself. (GID4)
14.Being a nomad is an important part of who I am. (GID)
15.How many of the people in this group did you know before today?
Please think about people in this group for these questions. On the whole, how similar do you think most people in this group are to you…
Extremely similarNot at all similar
17.Intellectually?1234567
18.In the way they think?1234567
19.In their values?1234567
20.In their behaviors?1234567

Notes:

Questions 1–15 are Likert-scale questions with the following possible responses: Strongly Disagree/Disagree/Neutral/Agree/Strongly Agree.

1PDN: perceived descriptive norm.

2PIN: perceived injunctive norm.

3GO: group orientation.

4GID: group identification.

figures/ijc2019-2019010_fig_001.jpg
Figure 1:

Mean days volunteered for anti-trapping patrol (vertical axis) by treatment and round (horizontal axis).

Note: Treatments: Control, Injunctive norms (IN) message, payment, injunctive norms (IN) message+payment.

figures/ijc2019-2019010_fig_002.jpg
Figure 2:

Mean days volunteered for anti-trapping patrol (vertical axis) by treatment and phase (horizontal axis).

Note: Treatments: Control, Injunctive norms (IN) message, payment, injunctive norms (IN) message+payment.

figures/ijc2019-2019010_fig_003.jpg
Figure 3:

Perceived descriptive norms (vertical axis) by treatment, rounds 1, 5, 10, 15 (horizontal axis).

Note: perceived descriptive norms measures are a composite of responses to survey questions 1, 5, 7 and 8 in Table 1, each of which reflects descriptive norms. Treatments: Control, Injunctive norms (IN) message, payment, injunctive norms (IN) message+payment.

figures/ijc2019-2019010_fig_004.jpg
Figure 4:

Perceived injunctive norms (vertical axis) by treatment, rounds 1, 5, 10, 15 ­(horizontal axis).

Note: perceived injunctive norms measures are a composite of responses to survey questions 2, 3, 4 and 6 in Table 1, each of which reflects injunctive norms. Treatments: Control, Injunctive norms (IN) message, payment, injunctive norms (IN) message+payment.

Table 2:

Summary statistics of variables in the model.

NMinimumMaximumMeanStd. Deviation
Days volunteered for antitrapping patrol19200.007.005.6051.69
Initial group average days (in round 1)19201281.07.05.35
Collective descriptive norm (CDN)1192017920.07.05.61
Perceived descriptive norm (PDN)25121.005.004.450.76
Perceived injunctive norm (PIN)25121.805.004.420.68
Injunctive norms message319200.001.000.500.50
Financial incentive419200.001.000.170.37
Post-financial incentive519200.001.000.170.37

1Lagged average days for other participants in the group (the non-self mean). Round 15 is excluded.

2PDN and PIN are computed using confirmatory factor analysis on the responses to survey questions listed in Table 1 designed to measure PDN and PIN, respectively.

3Dummy variable set equal to 1 for cases in the injunctive norms message treatment. This message is delivered in all 15 rounds.

4Dummy variable set to equal 1 for cases in the financial incentive treatment groups during phase 2 when the financial incentive is in effect, otherwise zero.

5Dummy variable set to equal 1 for cases in the financial incentive treatment groups during phase 3, when the incentive has been withdrawn.

Table 3:

Estimation results: number of days volunteered.

Model 1Model 2Model 3
Initial group avg. days (phase 1, round 1)0.10 (0.06)*0.11 (0.05)**0.11 (0.5)**
Financial incentive0.12 (0.10)0.10 (0.09)0.36 (0.42)
Post-financial incentive0.15 (0.09)0.13 (0.08)−0.28 (0.49)
Collective descriptive norm (CDN)0.00 (0.06)−0.02 (0.05)−0.02 (0.06)
Own days volunteered in previous round0.73 (0.06)***0.71 (0.06)***0.70 (0.06)***
Injunctive norms message−0.01 (0.09)
Perceived descriptive norm (PDN)−0.01 (0.08)−0.01 (0.07)
Perceived injunctive norm (PIN)0.17 (0.06)***0.16 (0.07)**
Financial incentive*perceived injunctive norm−0.06 (0.09)
Post-financial incentive*perceived injunctive norm0.09 (0.10)
N179217921792
r20.600.600.60

Notes: OLS regression; standard errors in parentheses, * p<0.10, ** p<0.05, *** p<0.01. All models contain a variable for round (1–5) and dummy variables for phases 2 and 3.

Table 4:

Estimation results: perceived injunctive norm.

Initial group avg. days volunteered (phase 1, round 1)−0.05 (0.02)***
Financial incentive0.11 (0.05)**
Post-financial incentive0.12 (0.05)**
Injunctive norms message0.03 (0.03)
Collective descriptive norm (CDN)0.12 (0.02)***
Own days volunteered in previous round0.16 (0.02)***
N1792
r20.07

Notes: OLS regression; clustered (by group) robust standard errors in parentheses, * p<0.10, ** p<0.05, *** p<0.01.

Model also contains a variable for round (1–5) and dummy variables for phases 2 and 3.

Table 5:

Mediation model: regression of days volunteered on perceived injunctive norms (mediator) and payment (exogenous variable).

Panel A: regression of perceived injunctive norms (mediator) on financial incentive
Model 1
Financial incentive0.06 (0.03)*
Constant1.02 (0.08)***
N1792
r20.66
F435.5
Model 2Model 3
Perceived injunctive norms (mediator)0.17 (0.08)***
Financial incentive (independent variable)0.10 (0.09)0.09 (0.9)
Constant0.39 (0.28)−0.26 (0.22)
N17921792
r20.60.6
F337.09301.44

Notes: Control variables: initial group average days, collective descriptive norm, own number of days volunteered in previous round, perceived descriptive norm, round, phase 1, phase 2.

OLS regression; standard errors in parentheses, * p<0.10, ** p<0.05, *** p<0.01; Sobel-Goodman Tests indicate 31% of the variance in perceived descriptive norms is explained by the mediator, Sobel coefficient=0.032; SE=0.018, z=1.82, p=0.10.

Table 6:

Mediation model: regression of days volunteered on perceived injunctive norms (mediator) and post-payment (exogenous variable).

Panel A: regression of perceived injunctive norms (mediator) on post-financial incentive
Model 1
Post-financial incentive0.07 (0.03)**
Constant1.01 (0.08)***
N1792
r20.65
F436.09
Model 2Model 3
Perceived injunctive norms (mediator)0.17 (0.07)***
Post-financial incentive (independent variable)0.13 (0.11)0.12 (0.09)
Constant−0.26 (0.22)
N17921792
r20.60.6
F337.4301.67

Notes: Control variables: initial group average days, collective descriptive norm, own number of days volunteered in previous round, perceived descriptive norm, round, phase 1, phase 2.

Standard errors in parentheses; * p<0.10, ** p<0.05, *** p<0.01; Sobel-Goodman Tests indicate 28% of the variance in perceived descriptive norms is explained by the mediator, Sobel coefficient=0.037; SE=0.017, z=2.12, p=0.05.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.882 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Apr 25, 2019
Published by: Uopen Journals
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 John M. Kerr, Tsering Bum, Maria K Lapinski, Rain Wuyu Liu, Zhi Lu, Jinhua Zhao, published by Uopen Journals
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.