Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Differentiated reactions to Payment for Ecosystem Service Programs in the Columbia River Basin: A qualitative study exploring irrigation district characteristics as local common-pool resource management institutions in Oregon, USA Cover

Differentiated reactions to Payment for Ecosystem Service Programs in the Columbia River Basin: A qualitative study exploring irrigation district characteristics as local common-pool resource management institutions in Oregon, USA

Open Access
|Apr 2018

Figures & Tables

Table 1:

Analysis framework.

CPRM enabling characteristicsDistrict attributesAttribute descriptionsSupporting literature for attributes
Resource characteristicsWater availability
Water source
Water right priority
Water availability – level of scarcity or uncertainty
Water source – physical location and surface water type
Water right priority is the order in which the district receives water relative to other districts in the basin
(Tang 1992; Meinzen-Dick 2007)
User characteristicsWater dependence
Homogeneity
Group size
Water dependence – district member reliance on water for livelihood
Homogeneity – similarity of water use within a district
Group size – the number of patrons served by a district
(Ostrom 1990, 1994; Agrawal 2001)
Existing institutionsWater sharing/Transfers
Infrastructure
Delivery efficiency
Water sharing – Ability to lease or transfer water to other patrons within the district
Infrastructure – Physical capacity to physical move water
Delivery efficiency – the ability to move water with minimal waste
(Tang 1992; Ostrom 1994; Garrick and Aylward 2012)
External environmentRelationships with other entities
Federal and state laws
Quality of relationships that districts have with other organizations
Enforcement of Endangered Species Act or other environmental regulations
(Ostrom 1994; Merrey 1996; Agrawal 2001)
Table 2:

District groupings.

CPRM characteristicsWater rights protectorsCautious convertersNew pioneers
Resource characteristicLow costs for water delivery
Low efficiency water delivery
High cost for water delivery
Seeking opportunities for replacing aging infrastructure
Low cost for water delivery
High efficiency water delivery
User characteristicsHomogenous, High agricultural dependencyIncreasingly heterogeneous suburban usesHeterogeneous, high profit crops
Existing institutionsStatic formal rules, accompanied by social norms
Mix of junior and senior water rights
Dynamic formal rules
Junior water rights
Dynamic formal rules
Senior water rights
External environmentFew connections to other entities, typically contractual agreements with Bureau of ReclamationIncreasingly integrated, collaborating to improve water security or address environmental concernsHighly integrated with other districts, state and federal agencies, and local watershed institutions
Integration with transactionsInstream leasing informally discouragedInstream leasing allowed lack formal mechanism for instream leasingProvide mechanisms for allowing instream leasing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.806 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Apr 23, 2018
Published by: Uopen Journals
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Spencer Thomas Plumb, Travis Paveglio, Kelly West Jones, Brett Alan Miller, Dennis R Becker, published by Uopen Journals
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.