Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sustainability of generalized exchange in the sharing economy: The case of the “freecycling” Facebook groups Cover

Sustainability of generalized exchange in the sharing economy: The case of the “freecycling” Facebook groups

By: Lukas Norbutas and  Rense Corten  
Open Access
|Apr 2018

Figures & Tables

figures/ijc2018-2018013_fig_001.jpg
Figure 1

Friendship network of the freecycling group in Facebook (blue points – females; green points – males).

figures/ijc2018-2018013_fig_002.jpg
Figure 2

Number of members in the freecycling Facebook group by date.

Table 1:

Descriptive statistics.

N = 64,625 (multiple obs per individual)Mean/%SDRange
Dependent variable
 Posting behavior0.0050.070–1
Independent variables
 Commenting behavior (past 3 days)0.0900.630/18
 Length of stay23.8646.891/33
 Total posts observed (past 3 days)39.18615.490/87
Controls
 Total number of comments (past 3 days)411.37781.410/529
 Degree centrality5.0465.780/58
 Local clustering coefficient0.1340.2250/1
 Day 10.0080–1
 Newcomer (N = 4910)0.1050–1
 Female (N = 4910)0.7380–1
figures/ijc2018-2018013_fig_003.jpg
Figure 3

An example of a typical item offer (children’s clothing) and item requests (comments) in the group. The highlighted text above the picture reads, translated from Dutch: “Only for people who really need it! No response = trash! Multiple responses = lottery! No desperate private messages please, I’m not sensitive to that! Pick up in Overvecht!”. The three comments read “yes please”, “I’d like to participate in the lottery please ϑ ”and “I’d like to come and pick it up,” respectively.

figures/ijc2018-2018013_fig_004.jpg
Figure 4

Number of posts in the group by date.

Table 2:

Multilevel logistic regression on posting behavior in the freecycling group.

B (S.E.)Odds ratioB (S.E.)Odds ratioB (S.E.)Odds ratio
Intercept−15.691 (1.53)−15.153 (1.37)−15.837 (1.42)
Length of stay0.047** (0.01)1.0490.029 (0.01)1.0290.037* (0.01)1.038
Commenting behavior (past 3 days)0.301** (0.10)1.3510.304** (0.10)1.355
Total posts observed (past 3 days)0.009* (0.00)1.009
Total comments (past 3 days)0.001 (0.00)1.0010.002 (0.00)1.002
Log(Degree)−0.308 (0.20)0.734−0.310 (0.19)0.732−0.319 (0.19)0.726
Clustering coefficient−0.802 (0.83)0.447−0.777 (0.81)0.459−0.759 (0.81)0.467
Day 10.819 (0.74)2.2691.502* (0.74)4.4941.955* (0.79)7.069
Newcomer1.929** (0.70)6.8861.636* (0.70)5.1351.873* (0.72)6.510
Female1.007* (0.42)2.7370.998* (0.41)2.7130.998* (0.41)2.713
Variance (intercept)22.361 (5.07)19.219 (4.03)19.220 (4.03)
Log likelihood−1227.917−1220.148−1218.197

*− significant at p < 0.05.

**− significant at p < 0.01.

Statistically significant coefficients provided in bold.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.789 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Apr 23, 2018
Published by: Uopen Journals
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Lukas Norbutas, Rense Corten, published by Uopen Journals
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.