Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Finding common ground between theories of collective action: the potential of analyses at a meso-scale Cover

Finding common ground between theories of collective action: the potential of analyses at a meso-scale

Open Access
|Oct 2017

Figures & Tables

figures/ijc2017-2017033_fig_001.jpg
Figure 1

Examples of research on collective action using different validity scales.

Table 1:

How the theoretical bases used by Shah (1995 and 1996) and Ben Mustapha (2016) address the criticisms of sociologists and anthropologists with regard to the IESD school of thought.

ShahBen Mustapha
Multiple issues and social embeddednessThe qualitative component of the analysis takes into account multiple issues and social embeddednessThe interactions between actors were studied with regard to several issues
Multiple values, objectives and definitions of performanceA social constructivist approach of performanceA social constructivist approach of performance
External actors and factorsThe study takes into account supporting institutions and economic contextThe influence of major actors external to the irrigation scheme is taken into account
Power relationshipsPower relationships are taken into account in the qualitative component of the studyThere is an assessment of how actors attempt to impose their viewpoints, alone or in coalitions
History and processesThis component is considered in the qualitative component of the studyThe study involved an assessment of the evolution of the relations between actors over a 4-year period
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.776 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Oct 16, 2017
Published by: Uopen Journals
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Nicolas Faysse, Azza Ben Mustapha, published by Uopen Journals
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.