Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Access without benefit-sharing: Design, effectiveness and reform of the FAO Seed Treaty Cover

Access without benefit-sharing: Design, effectiveness and reform of the FAO Seed Treaty

International Journal of the Commons
Volume 11 (2017): Issue 2
By: Florian Rabitz  
Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. Altieri and Rogé 2010
    AltieriM RogéP The Ecological Role and Enhancement of Biodiversity in Agroecosystems Agriculture, Biodiversity and Markets. Livelihoods and Agroecology in Comparative Perspective 2010 LockieS CarpenterD. London/Washington, DC Earthscan
    Back to article
  2. Andersen 2008
    AndersenR Governing Agrobiodiversity. Plant Genetics and Developing Countries 2008 Aldershot Ashgate
    Back to article
  3. Buck and Hamilton 2011
    BuckM HamiltonC The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 2011 20 1 47 61 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2011.00703.x
    Back to article
  4. CGRFA 2016
    CGRFA ABS Elements. Elements to Facilitate Domestic Implementation of Access and Benefit-sharing for Different Subsectors of Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture 2016 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization
    Back to article
  5. Chiarolla 2008
    ChiarollaC Plant Patenting, Benefit Sharing and the Law Applicable to the Food and Agriculture Organisation Standard Material Transfer Agreement Journal of World Intellectual Property 2008 11 1 1 28 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00332.x
    Back to article
  6. Chiarolla and Jungcurt 2011
    ChiarollaC JungcurtS Outstanding Issues on Access and Benefit-Sharing under the Multilateral System of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture 2011 Berne Declaration/Norwegian Development Fund
    Back to article
  7. Chiarolla and Shand 2013
    ChiarollaC ShandH An Assessment of Private Ex Situ Collections: The Private Sector’s Participation in the Multilateral System of the FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Berne Declaration/Norwegian Development Fund 2013
    Back to article
  8. Compliance Committee 2017
    Compliance Committee Synthesis of Reports Received from Contracting Parties on Measures Taken to Implement the Provisions of the International Treaty Second Meeting of the Compliance Committee, IT/GB7/CC-2/17/3 2017
    Back to article
  9. Correa 2006
    CorreaC. M Considerations on the Standard Material Transfer Agreement under the FAO Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Journal of World Intellectual Property 2006 9 2 137 165 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1422-2213.2006.00272.x
    Back to article
  10. Coupe and Lewins 2007
    CoupeS LewinsR Negotiating the Seed Treaty 2007 Rugby Practical Action Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780441252
    Back to article
  11. de Carvalho 2005
    de CarvalhoN. P From the Shaman’s Hut to the Patent Office: In Search of a TRIPS-Consistent Requirement to Disclose the Origin of Genetic Resources and Prior Informed Consent Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 2005 17 111 186
    Back to article
  12. De Castro et al. 2013
    De CastroP AdinolfiF CapitanioF Di FalcoS di MambroA The Politics of Land and Food Scarcity 2013 London/New York Routledge
    Back to article
  13. Dutfield 2004
    DutfieldG Intellectual Property, Biogenetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge 2004 London/Sterling, VA Earthscan
    Back to article
  14. ENB 2015
    ENB 2015 Summary of the Sixth Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: 5–9 October 2015 Earth Negotiation Bulletin 9 656 1 15
    Back to article
  15. ETC Group 2015
    ETC Group 2015 Breaking Bad: Big Ag Mega-mergers in Play Dow+DuPont in the Pocket? Next Demonsanto? ETC Group Communiqué 115 Montreal Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration
    Back to article
  16. Esquinas-Alcázar 2005
    Esquinas-AlcázarJ Protecting Crop Genetic Diversity for Food Security: Political, Ethical and Technical Challenges Nature Reviews Genetics 2005 6 12 946 953 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1729
    Back to article
  17. FAO 2010
    FAO The Second Report on the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture 2010 Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Rome Food and Agriculture Organization
    Back to article
  18. Fleck and Baldock 2003
    FleckB BaldockC Intellectual Property Protection for Plant-related Inventions in Europe Nature Reviews Genetics 2003 4 10 834 838 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1184
    Back to article
  19. Fuglie et al. 2012
    FuglieK HeiseyP KingJ PrayC. E SchimmelfennigD The Contribution of Private Industry to Agricultural Innovation Science 2012 338 6610 1031 1032 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226294
    Back to article
  20. GB 2013
    GB 2013 Implementation of the Multilateral System of Access and Benefit-Sharing. Resolution 1/2013 of the Governing Body to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
    Back to article
  21. GB 2015
    GB 2015 Measures to Enhance the Functioning of the Multilateral System of Access and Benefit-Sharing. Draft Resolution 1/2015 of the Governing Body to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
    Back to article
  22. Halewood 2013
    HalewoodM What Kind of Goods are Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture? Towards the Identification and Development of a New Global Commons International Journal of the Commons 2013 7 2 278 312 https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.412
    Back to article
  23. Kloppenburg 1987
    KloppenburgJ. R Seed Wars: Common Heritage, Private Property, and Political Strategy Socialist Review 1987 95 7 41
    Back to article
  24. Mitchell 2006
    MitchellR. B Problem Structure, Institutional Design, and the Relative Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements Global Environmental Politics 2006 6 3 72 89 https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2006.6.3.72
    Back to article
  25. Moeller and Stannard 2013
    MoellerN. I StannardC Identifying Benefit Flows. Studies on the Potential Monetary and Non-monetary Benefits Arising from the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture 2013 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization
    Back to article
  26. Murphy 2007
    MurphyD. J People, Plants, and Genes. The Story of Crops and Humanity 2007 Oxford/New York Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207145.001.0001
    Back to article
  27. Noriega et al. 2013
    NoriegaI. L WambuguP MejíasA Assessment of Progress to Make the Multilateral System Functional: Incentives and Challenges at the Country Level Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons: Challenges in International Law and Governance 2013 HalewoodM López Noriega and S. LouafiI London Earthscan 201 227
    Back to article
  28. Oberthür and Pozarowska 2013
    OberthürS PozarowskaJ Managing Institutional Complexity and Fragmentation: The Nagoya Protocol and the Global Governance of Genetic Resources Global Environmental Politics 2013 13 3 100 118 https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00185
    Back to article
  29. OEWG 2014
    OEWG 2014 An analysis of the factors that influence the willingness of stakeholder groups to make contributions to the benefit-sharing fund and to access plant genetic resources for food and agriculture from the multilateral system. Ad-hoc Open-ended Working Group to Enhance the Functioning of the Multilateral System. Second meeting. IT/OWG-EFMLS-2/14/6
    Back to article
  30. OEWG 2015a
    OEWG 2015a Commentary on Structural Elements for the Development of a Subscription Model/System. Ad-hoc Open-ended Working Group to Enhance the Functioning of the Multilateral System. Fourth Meeting. IT/OWG-EFMLS-4/15/4
    Back to article
  31. OEWG 2015b
    OEWG 2015b Development of a Subscription System for Users of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture under the Treaty (Measure III): Background Information. Ad-hoc Open-ended Working Group to Enhance the Functioning of the Multilateral System. Third Meeting. IT/OWG-EFMLS-3/15/Inf. 5
    Back to article
  32. OEWG 2015c
    OEWG 2015c Submissions received by the Working Group during the Biennium, in preparation for the subscription system and the draft revised Standard Material Transfer Agreement. Ad-hoc Open-ended Working Group to Enhance the Functioning of the Multilateral System. Fourth Meeting. IT/OWG-EFMLS-4/15/Inf. 3
    Back to article
  33. OEWG 2016a
    OEWG 2016a Note by the Co-chairs on the Outcome of the Friends of the Co-chairs Groups. Ad-hoc Open-ended Working Group to Enhance the Functioning of the Multilateral System. Fifth Meeting. IT/OWG-EFMLS-5/16/4
    Back to article
  34. OEWG 2016b
    OEWG 2016b Report from the Friends of the Co-chairs Group on Access Mechanisms and Payment Rates. Ad-hoc Open-ended Working Group to Enhance the Functioning of the Multilateral System. Fifth Meeting. IT/OWG-EFMLS-5/16/Inf.5
    Back to article
  35. Palombi 2009
    PalombiL Gene Cartels: Biotech Patents in the Age of Free Trade 2009 Cheltenham Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848447431
    Back to article
  36. PIP-FW AG 2015
    PIP-FW AG 2015 Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework Advisory Group Annual Report to the Director-General under PIP Framework Section 7.2.5. Annual Report. Geneva: World Health Organization
    Back to article
  37. Rabitz 2017
    RabitzF The Global Governance of Genetic Resources: Institutional Change and Structural Constraints 2017 London/New York Routledge
    Back to article
  38. Raustiala and Victor 2004
    RaustialaK VictorD. G The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources International Organization 2004 58 2 277 309 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582036
    Back to article
  39. Rosendal 2000
    RosendalK The Convention on Biological Diversity and Developing Countries 2000 Boston Kluwer Academics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9421-9
    Back to article
  40. Schaffrin et al. 2006
    SchaffrinD GörlachB GerstetterC The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture – Implications for Developing Countries and Interdependence with International Biodiversity and Intellectual Property Law 2006 Berlin Ecologic Institute
    Back to article
  41. Stannard 2013
    StannardC 2013 The Multilateral System of Access and Benefit Sharing: Could it Have Been Constructed Another Way? Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons: Challenges in International Law and Governance HalewoodM NoriegaI. L LouafiS. 243 264 London Earthscan
    Back to article
  42. ten Kate and Laird 1999
    ten KateK LairdS. A The Commercial Use of Biodiversity. Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-sharing 1999 London Earthscan
    Back to article
  43. Thornton et al. 2005
    ThorntonD GunninghamN. A KaganR. A 2005 General Deterrence and Corporate Environmental Behavior Law & Policy 27 2 262 288 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00200.x
    Back to article
  44. Tvedt 2014
    TvedtM. W Beyond Nagoya: Towards a Legally Functional System of Access and Benefit Sharing Global Governance of Genetic Resources. Access and Benefit Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol 2014 OberthürS RosendalG. K Abingdon Routledge 158 177
    Back to article
  45. Ulukan 2011
    UlukanH The Use of Plant Genetic Resources and Biodiversity in Classical Plant Breeding Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 2011 61 2 97 104 https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710903573390
    Back to article
  46. Underdal 2002
    UnderdalA One Question, Two Answers Environmental Regime Effectiveness. Confronting Theory with Evidence 2002 MilesE. L. UnderdalA. AndresenS. WettestadJ. SkjærsethJ. B. CarlinE. M. Cambridge, MA/London MIT Press
    Back to article
  47. Wallbott et al. 2014
    WallbottL WolffF PozarowskaJ The Negotiations of the Nagoya Protocol. Issues, Coalitions and Process Global Governance of Genetic Resources. Access and Benefit Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol 2014 OberthürS RosendalG. K Abingdon Routledge 33 59
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.736 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Published on: Oct 16, 2017
Published by: Uopen Journals
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
agricultural biodiversity,
access and benefit-sharing,
genetic resources,
intellectual property,
regime effectiveness

© 2017 Florian Rabitz, published by Uopen Journals
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 11 (2017): Issue 2Next article