Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Institutional nesting and robustness of self-governance: the adaptation of irrigation systems in Taiwan Cover

Institutional nesting and robustness of self-governance: the adaptation of irrigation systems in Taiwan

By: Wai Fung Lam and  Chung Yuan Chiu  
Open Access
|Sep 2016

Figures & Tables

figures/ijc2016-2016045_fig_001.jpg
Figure 1:

Irrigation systems by ecological-physical settings.

figures/ijc2016-2016045_map_001.jpg
Map 1:

Locations of the four ecological-institutional settings.

Table 1:

Nesting structure and adaptation strategies.

Extent and structure of nestingFarmers’ adaptation strategiesPatterns of change of local institutions
SinkangTightly nested
Through strict adherence to RIS and heavy infrastructure investment.
Seeking help from IA for more intensive management and infrastructure investment.A rapid deterioration of local institutions.
KungwenDisjointedly nested
Through adherence to RIS with major modifications with a view to strengthening horizontal complementary among farmers.
Responses falling into two extremes. While some farmers take the initiative to perfect the existing rules, some simply give up.Rigorous yet unstable rule-crafting efforts in pockets of systems, resulting in a certain degree of institutional diversity.
Guiren-TaipuWeakly nested
Through infrastructure investment from the IA and complementary actions from farmers and IA officials.
Seeking help from IA for continual infrastructure investment with farmers fine-tuning the local rules to cope with contingencies at specific locales.Relatively minor institutional changes with narrow scopes.
Guiren-YirenjunMinimally nested
Through a recognition of autonomy and farmers’ collective action.
Crafting and re-crafting rules for better collective action.Rigorous rule-crafting efforts with a high degree of institutional diversity.
figures/ijc2016-2016045_fig_002.jpg
Figure 2:

Estimated differences of paired systems on social capital (SC), management order (MO), mutual help (M), farmer involvement-past (I), farmer involvement-present (Ii), groundwater-past (GW), groundwater-present (GWi), fallowed lands (F), deprivation (D), and conflicts (C).

Note: Each graph pairs one region with the other three. Groundwater measures are not available for Kungwen.

Table 2:

Multiple dimensions of irrigation performance.*

Sinkang (N=13)Kungwen (N=8)Guiren-Taipu (N=5)Guiren-Yirenjun (N=8)Sinkang (N=13)Kungwen (N=8)Guiren-Taipu (N=5)Guiren-Yirenjun (N=8)
Percentage of fallowed lands (%)21.4662.254736.751857.505047.50
Reliance on groundwater in late 1990s (%)3.311617.5012017.50
Reliance on groundwater in 2008 (%)16.2323.6016.88102517.50
Change in reliance on groundwater** (%)+12.92+7.6−0.62+9+50
Farmer involvement in early 1980s (%)21.7925.163832.5017.5018.7537.5027.50
Farmer involvement in 2008 (%)9.132.0323.2521.196.25023.7516.25
Extent of mutual help among farmers (%)18.232.131825.63801020
Extent of deprivation0.690.251.400.750020
Extent of conflicts0.150.500.800.6300.5000
Social capital2.382.12522.3832.5023
Management order2.083.252.6042434

*For details, refer to Appendix 2.

**The score of ‘change in reliance on groundwater’ is calculated by subtracting the 1998 figure from the 2008 figure for systems in each ecological-physical setting.

Table 3:

Fallowed lands in Kungwen.

Irrigation groupFallowed lands in percentage of total cultivated areas
Sher Tien25
Tu Cheng Tze90
Xue Jia Liu30
Sha Lun Jiao90
Xi Nan Liu50
Xi Pu Liu98
Si Kung Chin Liu65
Si Xue Jia Liu50
figures/ijc2016-2016045_fig_003.jpg
Figure 3:

Longitudinal comparison of groundwater and involvement.

Note: The median farmer involvement has decreased universally. The pattern for groundwater suggests greater cross-system variation in groundwater use, with the increase in consumption more pronounced in Sinkang (SK) and Taipu (TP) but less so in Yirenjun (YRJ).

Appendix 1.

Physical and agricultural characteristics of the ecological-institutional settings.

SinkangKungwenGuiren-TaipuGuiren-Yirenjun
Hydrological/physical characteristicsA. Planned water supply (cms)*274.08191.23118.0575.29
B. Actual water supply (cms)196.6998.3970.0034.30
Water shortage percentage (A-B/A*100%)28.23%48.54%40.70%45.6%
Total length of canals (m)198,397101,77960522.5 (including a 9126 m lateral shared with Yirenju)80590.5 (including 9126 m lateral shared with Taipu)
Social-agriculture informationService area (ha)1600.335052.00448.26522.56
Production of paddy per hectare in 2008 (ton/ha)10.316.678.507.50
Total number of farmer-members6006534326842894

Note: All data are as of 2008.

*cms refers to “cubic meter per second”, which is used to measure the amount of water a particular area will receive during the water delivery periods for the area as specified in the Irrigation Plan.

Sources: Chianan Irrigation Association Headquarters, Sinkang Working Station, Kungwen Working Station, and Guiren Working Station.

Appendix 2.

Results of appraisal survey conducted in 2008.

What is the percentage of the service area in your irrigation system that was fallowed this year?

Ecological-institutional settingNMean (%)Median (%)Max (%)Min (%)Standard deviation
Sinkang1321.4618 65 020.57
Kungwen 862.2557.5982528.17
Guiren-Taipu 547.0050 5535 7.58
Guiren-Yirenjun 836.7547.570 326.5
Ecological-institutional settingNMean (%)Median (%)Max (%)Min (%)Standard deviation
Sinkang13 3.311200 5.97
Kungwen 8 – – – –
Guiren-Taipu 516.0020 30011.4
Guiren-Yirenjun 817.5017.555024.01
Ecological-institutional settingNMean (%)Median (%)Max (%)Min (%)Standard deviation
Sinkang1316.2310 70125.4
Kungwen 8 – – – –
Guiren-Taipu 523.602550017.95
Guiren-Yirenjun 816.8817.555518.1
Ecological-institutional settingNMean (%)Median (%)Max (%)Min (%)Standard deviation
Sinkang1321.7917.556.251.2516.30
Kungwen 825.1618.75 6012.515.70
Guiren-Taipu 538.0037.552.528.758.87
Guiren-Yirenjun 832.5027.561.25 1017.92
Ecological-institutional settingNMean (%)Median (%)Max (%)Min (%)Standard deviation
Sinkang13 9.13 6.2525 0 8.24
Kungwen 8 2.03 016.250 5.74
Guiren-Taipu 523.2523.7537.5512.80
Guiren-Yirenjun 821.1916.2552.50218.84
Ecological-institutional settingNMean (%)Median (%)Max (%)Min (%)Standard deviation
Sinkang1318.23 8100026.71
Kungwen8 2.13 0 100 3.64
Guiren-Taipu518.0010 60024.9
Guiren-Yirenjun825.6320 80029.21
Ecological-institutional settingNMeanMedianMaxMinStandard deviation
Sinkang130.690301.03
Kungwen 80.250100.46
Guiren-Taipu 51.42301.34
Guiren-Yirenjun 80.750301.16
Ecological-institutional settingNMeanMedianMaxMinStandard deviation
Sinkang130.150100.38
Kungwen80.50.5100.53
Guiren-Taipu50.80301.30
Guiren-Yirenjun80.630301.06
Ecological-institutional settingNMeanMedianMaxMinStandard deviation
Sinkang132.383310.87
Kungwen82.132.5310.99
Guiren-Taipu52 2 311
Guiren-Yirenjun82.383 310.92
Ecological-institutional settingNMeanMedianMaxMinStandard deviation
Sinkang132.082411.04
Kungwen 83.254511.98
Guiren-Taipu 52.6 3411.14
Guiren-Yirenjun 84 4511.31
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.638 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Sep 23, 2016
Published by: Uopen Journals
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Wai Fung Lam, Chung Yuan Chiu, published by Uopen Journals
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.