Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services Cover

Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services

International Journal of the Commons
Volume 8 (2014): Issue 2
By: John M. Kerr,  Mamta Vardhan and  Rohit Jindal  
Open Access
|Aug 2014

References

  1. Alix-Garcia et al. 2005 Alix-Garcia J de Janvry A Sadoulet E Torres J. M Varela J. B Ramos M. Z An Assessment of Mexico’s Payment for Environmental Services Program. Unpublished paper prepared for FAO by UC Berkeley and the Centre for Research and Teaching of Economics, Mexico 2005
    Back to article
  2. Andreoni 1989 Andreoni J Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence Journal of Political Economy 1989 97 1447 1458
    Back to article
  3. Auer 2007 Auer M More Aid, Better Institutions, or Both? Sustainability Science 2007 2 179 187
    Back to article
  4. Baland and Platteau 1996 Baland J-M Platteau J-P Halting degradation of naturalresources: is there a role for rural communities? 1996 Rome, Italy Food & Agriculture Organization
    Back to article
  5. Berg et al. 1995 Berg J Dickhaut J McCabe K Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History Games and Economic Behavior 1995 10 122 142
    Back to article
  6. Bowles and Polonia-Reyes 2011 Bowles S Polonia-Reyes S Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements? Journal of Economic Literature 2011 50 2 368 425
    Back to article
  7. Bray and Merino-Pérez 2002 Bray D Merino-Pérez L Los ejidos de Sebastopol y Atzintlimaya y la unión de ejidos forestales de Chignahuapan, Puebla. Pp 259–278, Chpt 11 La experiencia de las comunidades forestales en México 2002 Mexico Instituto Nacional de Ecología
    Back to article
  8. Bromley 2008 Bromley D Incentive-compatible Institutional Design: Who’s in Charge Here? Keynote Address for a Conference “Designing Pro-Poor Rewards for Ecosystem Services” Sponsored by the Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, April 7, 2008 2008
    Back to article
  9. Cardenas et al. 2000 Cardenas J. C Stranlund J Willis C Local Environmental Control and Institutional Crowding Out World Development 2000 28 10 1719 1733
    Back to article
  10. Child and Clayton 2004 Child B Clayton D McShane T Wells P The Luangwa Experiment in Zambia Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work. Towards More Effective Conservation and Development 2004 New York Columbia University Press 256 289
    Back to article
  11. Clements et al. 2010 Clements T John A Nielsen K An D Tan S Milner-Gulland E. J Payments for Biodiversity Conservation in the Context of Weak Institutions: Comparison of Three Programs from Cambodia Ecological Economics 2010 69 6 1283 1291
    Back to article
  12. Conservation International 2007 Conservation International Conservation Agreements: Model, Design, and Implementation. Conservation Stewards Program, Conservation International, Arlington, VA 2007
    Back to article
  13. Deci 1971 Deci E. L Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971 18 105 115
    Back to article
  14. Deci et al. 1999 Deci E. L Koestner R Ryan R. M A Meta-analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation Psychological Bulletin 1999 125 627 668
    Back to article
  15. Dietz et al. 2003 Dietz T Ostrom E Stern P. C The Struggle to Govern the Commons Science 2003 301 1907 1912
    Back to article
  16. Farrington and Lobo 1997 Farrington J Lobo C Scaling up Participatory Watershed Development in India: Lessons from the Indo-German Watershed Development Programme Natural Resource Perspectives 17 1997 London Overseas Development Institute
    Back to article
  17. Feeny et al. 1990 Feeny D Berkes F McCay B Acheson J The Tragedy of the Commons: 22 Years Later Human Ecology 1990 18 1 1 19
    Back to article
  18. Fehr and Falk 2002 Fehr E Falk A Psychological Foundations of Incentives European Economic Review 2002 46 687 724
    Back to article
  19. Fehr and Schmidt 1999 Fehr E Schmidt K. M A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation Quarterly Journal of Economics 1999 114 817 868
    Back to article
  20. Ferraro and Kiss 2002 Ferraro P. J Kiss A Direct Payments to Conserve Biodiversity Science 2002 298 5599 1718 1719
    Back to article
  21. Fisher et al. 2010 Fisher B Kulindwa K Mwanyoka I Turner R. K Burgess N Common Pool Resource Management and PES: Lessons and Constraints for Water PES in Tanzania Ecological Economics 2010 69 6 1253 1261
    Back to article
  22. Frey 1999 Frey B. S Morality and Rationality in Environmental Policy Journal of Consumer Policy 1999 22 395 417
    Back to article
  23. Garcia-Amado et al. 2013 Garcia-Amado L. R Perez M. R Garcia S. B Motivation for Conservation: Assessing Integrated Conservation and Development Projects and Payments for Environmental Services in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico Ecological Economics 2013 89 92 100
    Back to article
  24. Gustafsson 1998 Gustafsson B Scope and Limits of the Market Mechanism in Environmental Management Ecological Economics 1998 24 2 259 274
    Back to article
  25. Hajek et al. 2011 Hajek F Ventresca M. J Scriven J Castro A Regime-building for REDD+: Evidence from a Cluster of Local Initiatives in South-eastern Peru Environmental Science & Policy 2011 14 2 201 215
    Back to article
  26. Harbaugh et al. 2007 Harbaugh W. T Mayr U Burghart D. R Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations Science 2007 316 1622 1625
    Back to article
  27. Harford and Klein 2005 Harford T Klein M Aid and the Resource Curse: How Can Aid Be Designed to Preserve Institutions? Private Sector Development Vice Presidency Note 291. World Bank, Washington 2005
    Back to article
  28. Harvey et al. 2010 Harvey C. A Zerbock O Papageorgiou S Parra A What is Needed to Make REDD+ Work on the Ground? Lessons Learned from Pilot Forest Carbon Initiatives. Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia 2010
    Back to article
  29. Heyman and Ariely 2004 Heyman J Ariely D Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets Psychological Science 2004 15 787 793
    Back to article
  30. Huang et al. 2009 Huang M Upadhyaya S. K Jindal R Kerr J Payments for Watershed Services in Asia: A Review of Current Initiatives Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2009 28 3–5 551 575
    Back to article
  31. Jones and Murphree 2004 Jones B. T. B Murphree M Child B Murphree M Community-based Natural Resource Management as a Conservation Mechanism: Lessons and Directions. Chapter 2, pp. 63–104 Parks in Transition: Biodiversity, Rural Development and the Bottom Line 2004 London Earthscan
    Back to article
  32. Kerr 2010 Kerr J. M PSAH in Puebla, Mexico: a case study. Unpublished paper, Michigan State University 2010
    Back to article
  33. Kerr et al. 2012 Kerr J Vardhan M Jindal R Prosocial Behavior and Incentives: Evidence from Field Experiments in Rural Mexico and Tanzania Ecological Economics 2012 73 220 227
    Back to article
  34. Kerr et al. 2006 Kerr J Pender J Suyanto Property Rights and Environmental Services in Lampung Province, Indonesia. Presented at the International Association for the Study of Common Property Biennial Meeting, Ubud, Indonesia, June 19–23, 2006 2006
    Back to article
  35. Kerr 2002 Kerr J An Evaluation of Watershed Development Projects in India. Research Report 127 2002 Washington International Food Policy Research Institute
    Back to article
  36. Meinzen-Dick 2007 Meinzen-Dick R Beyond Panaceas in Water Institutions Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007 104 15200 15205
    Back to article
  37. Milne and Niesten 2009 Milne S Niesten E Direct Payments for Biodiversity Conservation in Developing Countries: Practical Insights for Design and Implementation Oryx 2009 43 530 541
    Back to article
  38. Muñoz-Piña et al. 2008 Muñoz-Piña C Guevara A Torres J. M Braña J Paying for the Hydrological Services of Mexico’s Forests: Analysis, Negotiations and Results Ecological Economics 2008 65 725 736
    Back to article
  39. Muradian et al. 2010 Muradian R Corbera E Pascual U Kosoy N May P Reconciling Theory and Practice: An Alternative Conceptual Framework for Understanding Payments for Environmental Services Ecological Economics 2010 69 1202 1208
    Back to article
  40. Narloch et al. 2012 Narloch U Pascual U Drucker A. G Collective Action Dynamics under External Rewards: Experimental Insights from Andean Farming Communities World Development 2012 40 10 2096 2107
    Back to article
  41. Ostrom 1990 Ostrom E Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
    Back to article
  42. Ostrom 2009 Ostrom E A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-ecological Systems Science 2009 325 419 422
    Back to article
  43. Ostrom et al. 1994 Ostrom E Gardner R Walker J Rules, Games and Common Pool Resources 1994 Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press
    Back to article
  44. Pagiola 2008 Pagiola S Payment for Environmental Services in Costa Rica Ecological Economics 2008 65 4 712 724
    Back to article
  45. Pagiola et al. 2005 Pagiola S Arcenas A Platais G Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America World Development 2005 33 2 237 253
    Back to article
  46. Peskett et al. 2011 Peskett L Schreckenberg K Brown J Institutional Approaches for Carbon Financing in the Forest Sector: Learning Lessons for REDD+ from Forest Carbon Projects in Uganda Environmental Science & Policy 2011 14 2 216 229
    Back to article
  47. Pender et al. 2007 Pender J Suyanto Kerr Cato E Impacts of the Hutan Kamasyarakatan Social Forestry Program in the Sumberjaya Watershed, Sumatra, Indonesia. Discussion Paper 769 2007 Washington, DC International Food Policy Research Institute
    Back to article
  48. Poteete et al. 2010 Poteete A Janssen M Ostrom E Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice 2010 Princeton Princeton University Press
    Back to article
  49. Raufflet 2003 Raufflet E A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Environmental Performance. Cahiers du CRISES Working paper no. ET0316. Centre de recherche sur les innovations sociales (CRISES). Université du Quèbec 2003
    Back to article
  50. Reynolds 2012 Reynolds T. W Institutional Determinants of Success Among Forestry-based Carbon Sequestration Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa World Development 2012 40 3 542 544
    Back to article
  51. Rights and Resources Initiative 2012 Rights and Resources Initiative What Rights? A Comparative Analysis of Developing Countries’ National Legislation on Community and Indigenous Peoples’ Forest Tenure Rights 2012 Washington, DC Rights and Resources Initiative
    Back to article
  52. Sommerville et al. 2010 Sommerville M Jones J Rahajaharison M Milner-Gulland E. J The Role of Fairness and Benefit Distribution in Community-based Payment for Environmental Services Interventions: A Case Study from Menabe, Madagascar Ecological Economics 2010 69 1262 1271
    Back to article
  53. Southgate and Wunder 2009 Southgate D Wunder S Paying for Watershed Services in Latin America: A Review of Current Initiatives Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2009 28 3–5 497 524
    Back to article
  54. USDA 2014 USDA Farm Service Agency Conservation Reserve Program. Retrieved from http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home 2014
    Back to article
  55. United Nations 2010 United Nations The UN-REDD Program Strategy: 2011–2015. United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries 2010
    Back to article
  56. United Nations 2014 United Nations http://www.un-redd.org/Donors_and_Partners/tabid/102612/Default.aspx, accessed April 1 2014 2014
    Back to article
  57. Van Hecken and Bastiaensen 2010 Van Hecken G Bastiaensen J Payments for Ecosystem Services in Nicaragua: Do Market-based Approaches Work? Development and Change 2010 41 3 421 444
    Back to article
  58. Van Noordwijk and Leimona 2010 Van Noordwijk M Leimona B Principles for Fairness and Efficiency in Enhancing Environmental Services in Asia: Payments, Compensation, or Co-investment? Ecology and Society 2010 15 4 17
    Back to article
  59. Vatn 2009 Vatn A Cooperative Behavior and Institutions The Journal of Socio-Economics 2009 38 188 196
    Back to article
  60. Vatn 2010 Vatn A An Institutional Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services Ecological Economics 2010 69 6 1245 1252
    Back to article
  61. Vollan 2008 Vollan B Socio-ecological Explanations for Crowding-out Effects from Economic Field Experiments in Southern Africa Ecological Economics 2008 67 4 560 573
    Back to article
  62. Wade 1989 Wade R Village Republics 1989 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
    Back to article
  63. Wunder 2008 Wunder S Payments for Environmental Services and the Poor: Concepts and Preliminary Evidence Environment and Development Economics 2008 13 3 279
    Back to article
  64. Wunder 2004 Wunder S Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42 2004 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research
    Back to article
  65. Zbinden and Lee 2005 Zbinden S Lee D. R Paying for Environmental Services: An Analysis of Participation in Costa Rica’s PSA Program World Development 2005 33 2 255 272
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.438 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Published on: Aug 31, 2014
Published by: Igitur Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
commons,
collective action,
conditionality,
Indonesia,
Mexico,
payment for ecosystem services,
payment for environmental services

© 2014 John M. Kerr, Mamta Vardhan, Rohit Jindal, published by Igitur Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 8 (2014): Issue 2Next article