References
-
Adair 1997
Adair J. R The Bioprospecting Question: Should the United States Charge Biotechnology Companies for the Commercial Use of Public Wild Genetic Resources Ecology Law Quarterly 1997 24 131 171 -
Albright 2004
Albright M Profits Pending: How Life Patents Represent the Biggest Swindle of the 21st Century 2004 Monroe Common Courage Press -
American Civil Liberties Union 2009
American Civil Liberties Union Legal Challenge to Human Gene Patents. Available at: http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/freespeech/brca_qanda.pdf. 2009 -
Andonian 1989
Andonian J Environment Changing in Pharmaceuticals Les Nouvelles 1989 24 48 -
Andrews and Paradise 2005
Andrews L. B Paradise J Gene Patents: The Need for Bioethics Scrutiny and Legal Change Yale Journal of Health Policy Law, and Ethics 2005 5 403 412 -
Aseff 2011
Aseff A First Federal Prohibition on Bioprospecting within a Place of Protection: Time to Spur the Legislative Dialogue Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 2011 22 189 218 -
Australian Law Reform Commission 2004
Australian Law Reform Commission Genes and Ingenuity: Gene Patenting and Human Health, Report 99 2004 Sydney Australian Commonwealth Available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/alrc/publications/reports/99/ -
Benkler 2000a
Benkler Y Constitutional Bounds of Database Protection: The Role of Judicial Review in the Creation and Definition of Private Rights in Information Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2000a 15 535 603 -
Benkler 2000b
Benkler Y An Unhurried View of Private Ordering in Information Transactions Vanderbilt Law Review 2000b 55 2063 2080 -
Bently and Sherman 2009
Bently L Sherman B Intellectual Property Law 2009 3rd ed Oxford Oxford University Press -
Bessen and Meurer 2008
Bessen J Meurer M. J Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk 2008 Princeton Princeton University Press -
Boettiger and Burk 2004
Boettiger S Burk D. L Open Source Patenting Journal of International Biotechnology Law 2004 1 221 231 -
Boldrin and Levine 2008
Boldrin M Levine D. K Against Intellectual Monopoly 2008 Cambridge Cambridge University Press -
Bowman 1996
Bowman M Bowman M Redgwell C The Nature, Development and Philosophical Foundations of the Biodiversity Concept in International law International Law And Conservation Of Biological Diversity 1996 The Hauge Kluwer Law International 5 31 -
Boyle 1996
Boyle J Shamans, Software & Spleens 1996 Cambridge Harvard University Press -
Boyle 2003
Boyle J The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain Law & Contemporary Problems 2003 66 33 74 -
Burk and Lemley 2009
Burk D. L Lemley M. A The Patent Crisis and How the Courts Can Solve It 2009 Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press -
Chambers 2002
Chambers J. C Patent Eligibility of Biotechnological Inventions in the United States, Europe, and Japan: How Much Patent Policy is Public Policy? George Washington International Law Review 2002 34 223 246 -
Conley 2009
Conley J. M Gene Patents and the Product of Nature Doctrine Chicago-Kent Law Review 2009 84 109 132 -
Conley and Makowski 2003
Conley J. M Makowski R Back to the Future: Rethinking the Product of Nature Doctrine as a Barrier to Biotechnology Patents (Part II) Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society 2003 85 371 385 -
Contreras 2010
Contreras J. L Data Sharing, Latency Variables and the Science Commons Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2010 25 1601 1672 -
Crescenzi 2012
Crescenzi A Bin R Access to Genetic Resources in the Practices of States Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights 2012 Milano Springer 345 353 -
Crespi 2003
Crespi R. S Patenting and Ethics – A Dubious Connection Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society 2003 85 31 47 -
Crespi 2005
Crespi R. S Ethico-Legal Issues in Biomedicine Patenting: A Patent Professional Viewpoint Science and Engineering Ethics 2005 11 117 136 -
Crichton 2007
Crichton M Patenting Life N.Y. Times 2007 2 13 A23 -
David and Foray 1995
David P Foray D Accessing and Expanding the Science and Technology Knowledge Base OECD Science Technology Industry Review 1995 16 13 68 -
Dedeurwaerdere 2005
Dedeurwaerdere T From Bioprospecting to Reflexive governance Ecological Economics 2005 53 473 491 -
Deibel 2009
Deibel E Common Genomes: An Open Source in Biology & Critical Theory Beyond the Patent 2009 Amsterdam Vrije Universiteit -
Doll 1998
Doll J. J The Patenting of DNA Science 1998 280 689 690 -
Eisemberg 1990
Eisemberg R Patenting the Human Genome Emory Law Journal 1990 39 721 745 -
Eisemberg 2006
Eisemberg R. S Ginzburg J. C Dreyfuss R. C The Story of Diamond v. Chakrabarty: Technological Change and the Subject Matter Boundaries of the Patent System Intellectual Property Stories 2006 New York Foundation Press 327 357 -
European Commission 2006
European Commission Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: education, research and innovation. Brussels, 208 final of 10.5.2006 2006 -
European Patent Office 2007
European Patent Office Scenarios For The Future – How Might IP Regimes Evolve by 2025? What Global Legitimacy Might Such Regimes Have? 2007 Munich European Patent Organisation -
Finegold et al. 2005
Finegold D. L Bensimon C. M Daar A. S Eaton M. L Beatrice Godard B Knoppers B. M Mackie J Singer P. A Bioindustry Ethics 2005 Boston, MA Elsevier Academic Press -
Frison et al. 2010
Frison C Dedeurwaerdere T Halewood M Intellectual Property and Facilitated Access to Genetic Resources under the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture European Intellectual Property Review 2010 32 1 8 -
Garforth 2008
Garforth K Gibson J Life as Chemistry or Life as Biology? An Ethic of Patents on Genetically Modified Organisms” Patenting Lives: Life Patents, Culture and Development 2008 Aldershot Ashgate 27 52 -
Geetter 2011
Geetter J. S Another Man’s Treasure: The Promise and Pitfalls of Leveraging Existing Biomedical Assets for Future Use Journal of Health & Life Scieces Law 2011 4 1 104 -
Ghosh 2012
Ghosh S Identity, Invention, and the Culture of Personalized Medicine Patenting 2012 Cambridge Cambridge University Press -
Gibson 2008
Gibson J Gibson J Patent Publics, Patent Cultures Patenting Lives: Life Patents, Culture and Development 2008 Aldershot Ashgate 1 6 -
Gitter 2001
Gitter D. M International Conflicts Over Patenting Human DNA Sequences in the United States and the European Union: An Argument for Compulsory Licensing and a Fair-Use Exemption N.Y.U. Law Review 2001 76 1623 1691 -
Gold and Carbone 2010
Gold E. R Carbone J Myriad Genetics: In the Eye of the Policy Storm Genetics in Medicine 2010 12 S39 S70 -
Guellec and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie 2007
Guellec D van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B The Economics of the European Patent System: IP Policy for Innovation and Competition 2007 Oxford Oxford University Press -
Hamelink 2003
Hamelink C. J Girard B Siochrú S. Ó Human Rights for the Information Society Communicating in the Information Society 2003 Geneve United Nations Research Institute for Social Development 121 163 -
Hanson 2002
Hanson M. J Magnus D Patenting Genes and Life: Improper Commodification? Who Owns Life? 2002 New York Prometheus Books 161 174 -
Hardin 1968
Hardin G The Tragedy of the Commons Science 1968 162 1243 1248 -
Heller 2008
Heller M The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives 2008 New York, NY Basic Books -
Heller and Eisenberg 1998
Heller M. A Eisenberg R Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research Science 1998 280 698 701 -
Hess and Ostrom 2006a
Hess C Ostrom E Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice 2006a Cambridge MIT Press -
Hess and Ostrom 2006b
Hess C Ostrom E A Framework for Analysing the Microbiological Commons International Social Science Journal 2006b 58 335 350 -
Holman 2013
Holman C. M In Myriad the Supreme Court Has, Once Again, Increased the Uncertainty of U.S. Patent Law Biotechnology Law Report 2013 32 1 5 -
Hovenkamp et al. 2006
Hovenkamp H. J Janis M. D Lemley M. A Unilateral Refusals to License in the US Journal of Competition Law and Economics 2006 2 1 42 -
Howlett and Christie 2003
Howlett M. J Christie A. F An Analysis of the Approach of the European, Japanese and United States Patent Offices to Patenting Partial DNA Sequences (ESTs) International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright 2003 34 581 602 -
Joint Policy Statement 1998
Joint Policy Statement Trilateral Co-operation of the US, European, and Japanese Patent Offices US, Japan and European Patent Offices Biotechnology Law Review 1998 7 159 193 -
Katz 1997
Katz E Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and Natural Community 1997 Lanham, MD Rowman and Littlefield -
Kevles and Berkowitz 2001
Kevles D. J Berkowitz A The Gene Patenting Controversy: A Convergence of Law, Economic Interests, and Ethics Brooklyn Law Review 2001 67 233 248 -
Koepsell 2009
Koepsell D Who Owns You? The Corporate Gold-Rush To Patent Your Genes 2009 Malden, Ma Wiley-Blackwell -
Larrimore Ouellette 2010
Larrimore Ouellette L Access to Bio-Knowledge: From Gene Patents to Biomedical Materials Stanford Technology Law Review 2010 2010 1 27 -
Liivak 2007
Liivak O Maintaining Competition in Copying: Narrowing the Scope of Gene Patents U.C. Davis Law Review 2007 41 177 238 -
Litman 1990
Litman J The Public Domain Emory Law Journal 1990 39 965 1023 -
Macchia 2012
Macchia G Bin R Patentability Requirements of Biotech Inventyions at the European Patent Office: Ethical Issues Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights 2012 Milano Springer 37 43 -
Madison et al. 2010
Madison M. J Frischmann B. M Strandburg K. J Constructing Commons in the Cultural Envinronment Cornell Law Review 2010 95 657 709 -
Mattix 1999
Mattix C The Debate over Bioprospecting on the Public Lands National Resources and Environment 1999 13 528 532 -
Michaels 1999
Michaels D Bioprospecting Agreements: Forging a Comprehensive Strategy for Managing Genetic Resources on Public Lands Environmental Law And Policy Journal 1999 22 3 70 -
Miki et al. 1994
Miki Y Swensen J Shattuck-Eidens D Futreal P. A Harshman K Tavtigian S Liu Q Cochran C Bennett L. M Ding W A Strong Candidate for the Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Gene BRCA1 Science 1994 266 66 71 -
Mills 2010
Mills O Biotechnological Inventions. Moral Restraints and Patent Law 2010 2nd ed Farnham Ashgate -
Moran et al. 2001
Moran K King S. R Carlson T. J Biodiversity Prospecting: Lessons and Prospects Annual Review of Anthropology 2001 30 505 526 -
Murray and Stern 2007
Murray F Stern S Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-Commons Hypothesis The Journal of Economic behavior and Organization 2007 63 648 687 -
National Research Council 2011
National Research Council – Committee on a Framework for Development a New Taxonomy of Disease Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease 2011 Washington, DC The National Academies Press -
Ostrom 1990
Ostrom E Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990 Cambridge Cambridge University Press -
Paradise 2005
Paradise J. K Lessons from the European Union: The Need for a Post-Grant Mechanism for Third-Party Challenge to U.S. Patents Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 2005 7 315 325 -
Personalized Medicine Coalition
Personalized Medicine Coalition Personalized Medicine 101. Available online at: http://www.personalizedmedicinecoalition.org/about/about-personalized-medicine/personalized-medicine-101. -
Qualset and Webster 1998
Qualset C. O Webster R. K Biotechnology: New benefits, New Questions California Agriculture 1998 52 2 2 -
Rai 1999
Rai A. K Regulating Scientific Research: Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science Northwestern University Law Review 1999 94 77 152 -
Rai 2007
Rai A. K Knowledge Commons: The Case of Biopharmaceutical Industry First Monday 2007 6 4 Available at: http://firstmonday.org/issue12_6/rai/index.html. -
Rai and Eisenberg 2003
Rai A. K Eisenberg R. S Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine Law & Contemporary Problems 2003 66 289 314 -
Reese and Opeskin 2006
Reese A Opeskin B Freckelton I Petersen K Current Issues in Gene Patenting Disputes and Dilemmas in Health Law 2006 Annandale, N.S.W. Federation Press 277 295 -
Reichman and Dreyfuss 2007
Reichman J. H Dreyfuss R. C Harmonization Without Consensus: Critical Reflections on Drafting a Substantive Patent Law Treaty Duke Law Journal 2007 57 85 130 -
Reinisch 2010
Reinisch A Reinisch A Decisions of the European Patent Organization Before National Courts Challenging Acts of International Organizations Before National Courts 2010 Oxford Oxford University Press 137 156 -
Resnik 2004
Resnik D. B Owning the Genome: A Moral Analysis of DNA Patenting 2004 Albany SUNY Press -
Resta 2011
Resta G Resta G Nuovi Beni Immateriali e Numerus Clausus dei Diritti Esclusivi Diritti Esclusivi e Nuovi Beni Immateriali 2011 Torino Utet 3 72 -
Restaino et al. 2003
Restaino L. G Halpern S. E Tang E. L Patenting DNA-Related Inventions in the European Union, United States and Japan: A Trilateral Approach or a Study in Contrast? UCLA Journal of Law & Technology 2003 7 2 25 -
Robinson and Medlock 2005
Robinson D Medlock N Diamond v. Chakrabarty: A Retrospective on 25 Years of Biotech Patents Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal 2005 17 12 15 -
Saladino 2011
Saladino T Seeing the Forest Through the Trees: Gene Patents & the Reality of the Commons Berkeley Technology Law Journal 2011 26 301 328 -
Samuelson 2003
Samuelson P Mapping the Digital Public Domain: Threats and Opportunities Law & Contemporary Problems 2003 66 147 171 -
Samuelson 2006
Samuelson P Enriching Discourse on Public Domains Duke Law Journal 2006 55 783 834 -
Sarnoff 2011
Sarnoff J. D Patent Eligible Medical and Biotechnology Inventions After Bilski, Prometheus, and Myriad Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal 2011 19 393 418 -
Sarr and Swanson 2012
Sarr M Swanson T Brousseau E Governance of the Research and Development Sector for Biotechnology: Intellectual Property Rights and Bioprospecting Reflexive Governance for Global Public Goods 2012 Cambridge, MA MIT Press 105 122 -
Sedjo 1992
Sedjo R. A Property Rights, Genetic Resources, and Biotechnological Change Journal of Law and Economics 1992 35 199 213 -
Shiva 1997
Shiva V Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge 1997 Cambridge, Ma South End Press -
Spinello and Bottis 2009
Spinello R. A Bottis M A Defense of Intellectual Property Rights 2009 Cheltenham Edward Elgar -
U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Services 2007
U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Services Personalized Health Care: Opportunities, Pathways, Resources. Available online at: www.hhs.gov/myhealthcare/news/phc-report.pdf 2007 -
U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Services 2008
U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Services Personalized Health Care Pioneers, Partnerships, Progress. Available online at; www.hhs.gov/myhealthcare/news/phc_2008_report.pdf 2008 -
U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission 2011
U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission The Evolving IP Marketplace: Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies With Competition 2011 Washington DC Federal Trade Commission -
Van Overwalle 2010a
Van Overwalle G Grosheide W Human Rights’ Limitations in Patent Law Intellectual Property And Human Rights. A Paradox 2010a Cheltenham Edward Elgar Publishing 236 271 -
Van Overwalle 2010b
Van Overwalle G Turning Patent Swords into Shares Science 2010b 330 1630 1631 -
Van Overwalle et al. 2006
Van Overwalle G Van Zimmeren E Verbeure B Matthijs G Models for Facilitating Access to Patents on Genetic Inventions Nature Review Genetics 2006 7 143 154 -
von der Ropp and Taubman 2006
von der Ropp A Taubman T Bioethics and Patent Law: The Case of Myriad WIPO Magazine 2006 4 8 9 -
Walsh et al. 2003
Walsh J. P Arora A Cohen W. M Working Through the Patent Problem Science 2003 299 1021 -
Willard and Ginsburg 2009
Willard H. F Ginsburg G. S Essentials of Genomic and Personalized Medicine 2009 Boston Academic Press -
Wood 2000
Wood M Are National Park Resources for Sale? Public Land & Resources Law Review 2000 21 201 222 -
Wright 2010
Wright T Patent Trends in the U.S. Supreme Court.Available at: http://brandlaw.org/2010/01/patent-trends-in-the-u-s-supreme-court/ (last visited Dec. 22, 2012) 2010