Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multiple levels and multiple challenges for measurement, reporting and verification of REDD+ Cover

Multiple levels and multiple challenges for measurement, reporting and verification of REDD+

International Journal of the Commons
Volume 7 (2013): Issue 2
By: Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki,  Maria Brockhaus,  Amy E. Duchelle,  Stibniati Atmadja,  Pham Thu Thuy and  Lydia Schofield  
Open Access
|Aug 2013

References

  1. Agrawal et al. 2008 Agrawal A Chatreand A Hardin R Changing Governance of the World’s Forests Science 2008 320 1460 1462
    Back to article
  2. Alencar et al. 2012 Alencar A Nepstad D Mendoza E Soares Filho B Moutinho P Stabile M. C. C McGrath D Mazer S Pereira C Azevedo A Stickler C Souza S Castro I Stella O Acre State’s Progress towards Jurisdictional REDD: Research, Analysis, and Recommendations for the State Carbon Incentive Program (ISA-Carbono) 2012 Brasília, Brazil Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia
    Back to article
  3. Angelsen et al. 2009 Angelsen A Brockhaus M Kanninen M Sills E Sunderlin W. D Wertz-Kanounnikoff S Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research
    Back to article
  4. Armitage 2008 Armitage D Governance and the Commons in a Multi-level World International Journal of the Commons 2008 2 7 32
    Back to article
  5. Barr et al. 2010 Barr C Dermawan A Purnomo H Komarudin H Financial Governance and Indonesia’s Reforestation Fund during the Soeharto and post-Soeharto periods, 1989–2009: A Political Economic Analysis of Lessons for REDD+. Occasional Paper 52 2010 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research
    Back to article
  6. Bird and Schreckenberg 2006 Bird N Schreckenberg K Developmental Impacts of Verification Systems in the Forest Sector 2006 VERIFOR Briefing Paper
    Back to article
  7. Boyd 2012 Boyd A MRV Across Multi-level Governance: National, Provincial and Municipal Institutions in South Africa. Energy Research Centre. World Resources Institute for the Measurement and Performance Tracking Project. MAPT Institutions Case Study Series 2012 Available online: http://www.erc.uct.ac.za/Research/publications/13-Boyd-MRV_Multilevel_Governance.pdf
    Back to article
  8. Brockhaus and Angelsen 2012 Brockhaus M Angelsen A Angelsen A Brockhaus M SunderlinW. D Verchot L. V Seeing REDD+ Through 4Is: A Political Economy Framework Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research 15 30
    Back to article
  9. Corbera and Schroeder 2011 Corbera E Schroeder H Governing and Implementing REDD+ Environmental Science and Policy 2011 14 89 99
    Back to article
  10. Cronkleton et al. 2011 Cronkleton P Bray B. D Medina G Community Forest Management and the Emergence of Multi-scale Governance Institutions: Lessons for REDD+ Development from Mexico, Brazil and Bolivia Forests 2011 2 451 473
    Back to article
  11. Dermawan et al. 2011 Dermawan A Petkova E Sinaga A Muhajir M Indriatmoko Y Preventing the Risks of Corruption in REDD+ in Indonesia 2011 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research
    Back to article
  12. Doherty and Schroeder 2011 Doherty E Schroeder H Forest Tenure and Multi-level Governance in Avoiding Deforestation under REDD Global Environmental Politics 2011 11 66 88
    Back to article
  13. Espeland and Stevens 2008 Espeland W. N Stevens M. L A Sociology of Quantification European Journal of Sociology 2008 49 401 436
    Back to article
  14. Estrada 2011 Estrada M Standards and Methods Available for Estimating Project-level REDD+ Carbon Benefits: Reference Guide for Project Developers. Working Paper 52 2011 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research.
    Back to article
  15. Forsyth 2009 Forsyth T Angelsen A Brockhaus M Kanninen M Sills E Sunderlin W. D Wertz-Kanounnikoff S Multilevel, Multiactor Governance in REDD+ Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research 113 122
    Back to article
  16. Gallemore and Dini 2012 Gallemore C Dini R Angelsen A Brockhaus M Sunderlin W. D Verchot L. V Regional Policy Networks in Indonesia Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research 102
    Back to article
  17. Gibson et al. 2000 Gibson C. C Ostrom E Ahn T. K The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change Ecological Economics 2000 32 217 239
    Back to article
  18. Gomes et al. 2010 Gomes R Bone S Cunha M Nahur A. C Moreira P. F Meneses-Filho L. C. L Voivodic M Bonfante T Moutinho P Exploring the Bottom-up Generation of REDD+ Policy by Forest-dependent Peoples Policy Matters 2010 17 161 168
    Back to article
  19. Government of Acre 2010 Government of Acre Sistema Estadual de Incentivos aosServiçosAmbientais 2010 Rio Branco, Brazil Governo do Acre
    Back to article
  20. Government of Mato Grosso 2013 Government of Mato Grosso SistemaEstadual de REDD+ 2013 Cuiabá, Brazil Governo do Mato Grosso
    Back to article
  21. Grainger 2008 Grainger A Difficulties in Tracking the Long-term Global Trend in Tropical Forest Area PNAS 2008 105 818 823
    Back to article
  22. Grainger and Matthews 2002 Grainger A Matthews E Evaluation of FAO’s Global Forest Resources Assessment from the user perspective Unasylva 2002 53 42 50
    Back to article
  23. Griffiths 2007 Griffiths T Seeing ‘REDD’? Forests, Climate Change Mitigation and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities 2007 Moreton-in-Marsh, UK Forest Peoples Programme
    Back to article
  24. Gupta et al. 2013 Gupta J van der Grijp N. M Kuik O. J Climate Change, Forests and REDD: Lessons for Institutional Design 2013 London Routledge
    Back to article
  25. Herold and Skutsch 2009 Herold M Skutsch M Angelsen A Brockhaus M Kanninen M Sills E Sunderlin W. D Wertz-Kanounnikoff S Measurement, Reporting and Verification for REDD+: Objectives, Capacities and Institutions Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options 2009 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research 85 100
    Back to article
  26. Indrarto et al. 2012 Indrarto G. B Muharjanti P Khatarina J Pulungan I Ivalerina F Rahman J Prana M. N Resosudarmo I. A. P Muharrom E The Context of REDD+ in Indonesia: Drivers, Agents and Institutions 2012 Jakarta and Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research and Indonesian Center for Environmental Law
    Back to article
  27. Kanninen et al. 2010 Kanninen M Brockhaus M Murdiyarso D Mery Harnessing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation Through REDD+ Forest and Society – Responding to Global Drivers of Change 2010 Vienna, Austria IUFRO IUFRO World Series Volume 25. IUFRO
    Back to article
  28. Korhonen-Kurki et al. 2012 Korhonen-Kurki K Brockhaus M Duchelle A Atmadja S Pham T. T Angelsen A Brockhaus M Sunderlin W. D Verchot L. V Multiple Levels, Multiple Challenges for REDD+ Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research 91 110
    Back to article
  29. Kurniatun et al. 2001 Kurniatun H Sitompul S. M van Noordwijk M Palm C Methods for Sampling Carbon Stocks Above and Below Ground. ASB Lecture Note 4b 2001 Bogor, Indonesia World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Program
    Back to article
  30. Larson and Petkova 2011 Larson A. M Petkova E An Introduction to Forest Governance, People and REDD+ in Latin America: Synergies and Opportunities Forests 2011 2 86 111
    Back to article
  31. Larson and Lewis-Mendoza 2012 Larson A Lewis-Mendoza J Decentralisation and Devolution in Nicaragua’s North Atlantic Autonomous Region: Natural Resources and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights International Journal of the Commons 2012 6 179 199
    Back to article
  32. Luttrell et al. 2012 Luttrell C Loft L Gebara M. F Kweka D Angelsen A Brockhaus M Sunderlin W. D Verchot L. V Who Should Benefit and Why? Discourses on REDD+ Benefit Sharing Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research 129 152
    Back to article
  33. Martins et al. 2013 Martins H Fonseca A Souza C Jr Sales M Veríssimo A Boletim Transparência Florestal da Amazônia Legal (Junho de 2013) 2013 Belém, Brazil Imazon
    Back to article
  34. May et al. 2011 May P Millikan P Gebara M. F The Context of REDD+ in Brazil. Drivers, Agents and Institutions. Occasional Paper 55 2011 Bogor, Indonesia Center for International Forestry Research
    Back to article
  35. Miles and Kapos 2008 Miles L Kapos V Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation: Global Land Use Implications Science 2008 320 1454 1455
    Back to article
  36. Mwangi and Wardell 2012 Mwangi E Wardell A Multi-Level Governance of Forest Resources International journal of the Commons 2012 6 79 103
    Back to article
  37. Nagendra and Ostrom 2012 Nagendra H Ostrom E Polycentric Governance of Multifunctional Forested Landscapes International Journal of the Commons 2012 6 104 133
    Back to article
  38. Ostrom 2012 Ostrom E Nested Externalities and Polycentric Institutions: Must We Wait for Global Solutions to Climate Change Before Taking Actions at Other Scales? Economic Theory 2012 49 353 369
    Back to article
  39. Pahl-Wostl 2009 Pahl-Wostl C A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Adaptive Capacity and Multi-level Learning Processes in Resource Governance Regimes Global Environmental Change 2009 19 354 365
    Back to article
  40. Peters and Pierre 2004 Peters B Pierre J Bache I Flinders M Multi-level Governance and Democracy: A Faustian bargain? Multi-level Governance 2004 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press
    Back to article
  41. Pham et al. 2009 Pham T. T Campbell B. M Garnett S Lessons for Pro-Poor Payment for Environmental Services: An Analysis of the Payment for Environmental Services Projects in Vietnam Asian Pacific Journal of Public Administration 2009 31 117 135
    Back to article
  42. Pham et al. 2010 Pham T. T Campbell B. M Garnett S Aslin H Hoang M. H Importance and impacts of intermediary boundary organisations in facilitating payment for environmental services in Vietnam Environmental Conservation 2010 37 64 72
    Back to article
  43. Pham et al. 2012 Pham T. T Moeliono M Hien N. T Tho N. H Hien V. T The Context of REDD+ in Vietnam: Drivers, Agents and Institutions 2012 Bogor, Indonesia and Hanoi, Vietnam Center for International Forestry Research and Central Institute for Economic Management
    Back to article
  44. Phelps et al. 2010 Phelps J Webb E Agrawal A Does REDD+ Threaten to Recentralize Forest Governance? Science 2010 328 312 313
    Back to article
  45. Poteete 2012 Poteete A Levels, Scales, Linkages, and Other ‘Multiples’ Affecting Natural Resources International Journal of the Commons 2012 6 134 150
    Back to article
  46. Poteete and Ostrom 2004 Poteete A. R Ostrom E Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management Development and Change 2004 35 437 461
    Back to article
  47. Ribot 2004 Ribot J. C Waiting for Democracy: The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization 2004 Washington, DC, USA World Resources Institute
    Back to article
  48. Richards and Panfil 2011 Richards M Panfil S. N Towardscost-effective Social Impact Assessment of REDD+ Projects: Meeting the Challenge of Multiple Benefit Standards International Forestry Review 2011 13 1 12
    Back to article
  49. Saunders et al. 2008 Saunders J Ebeling J Nussbaum R Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation: Lessons from a Forest Governance Perspective 2008 Oxford, UK Chatham House, ProForest and EcoSecurities
    Back to article
  50. Skutsch and van Laake 2008 Skutsch M van Laake P REDD as Multilevel Governance in the Making Energy and Environment 2008 19 831 844
    Back to article
  51. Soares et al. 2006 Soares B Nepstad D. C Curran L. M Cerqueira G. C Garcia R. A Ramos C. A Voll E McDonald A Lefebvre P Schlesinger P Modelling Conservation in the Amazon Basin Nature 2006 440 520 523
    Back to article
  52. Soares-Filho et al. 2012 Soares-Filho B Lima L Bowman M Viana L Challenges for Low-carbon Agricultura and Forest Conservation in Brazil IBD Technical Note 2012 385 35
    Back to article
  53. Swart et al. 2007 Swart R Bergamaschi P Pulles T Raeset F Are National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reports Scientifically Valid? Climate Policy 2007 7 535 538
    Back to article
  54. Van Laake and Skutsch 2008 Van Laake P Skutsch M Forest Biomass Assessment in Support of REDD by Indigenous People and Local Communities 2008 Submission in response to SBSTA agenda item 5, para. 11 (Document FCCC/SBSTA/2008/L.23)
    Back to article
  55. Van Noordwijk 2007 Van Noordwijk M Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal (RaCSA) 2007 Bogor, Indonesia World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Program
    Back to article
  56. Wunder 2010 Wunder S Forest Decentralization for REDD? A Response to Sandbrook et al Oryx 2010 44 335 337
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.372 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Published on: Aug 29, 2013
Published by: Igitur Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
climate change,
REDD,
multilevel governance

© 2013 Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki, Maria Brockhaus, Amy E. Duchelle, Stibniati Atmadja, Pham Thu Thuy, Lydia Schofield, published by Igitur Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 7 (2013): Issue 2Next article