Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Shareholder perceptions of individual and common benefits in Swedish forest commons Cover

Shareholder perceptions of individual and common benefits in Swedish forest commons

Open Access
|Feb 2013

Figures & Tables

figures/ijc2012-2012026-001.jpg
Figure 1

Average dividend per year per hectare in the Älvdalen, Jokkmokk and Tärna-Stensele (TSA) FCs during the five 10-year periods between 1958 and 2007, converted to 2006 prices. 1SEK= 0.15 USD.

Sources: Forest management reports and annual reports provided by each FC for the period 1958–2007, except Jokkmokk in the period 1958–1967, for which the source was Liljenäs (1977).

Box 1

Attributes of successful common property regimes (adapted from McKean 1998). These also generally correspond to the “design principles” for long surviving commons (Ostrom 1990)

figures/ijc2012-2012026-002.jpg
Box 2

The aims of the Swedish forest commons and the means intended to achieve them

figures/ijc2012-2012026-003.jpg
Table 1

Proportion of shareholders stating participation and use of their Forest Common (%). The percentage figures are rounded to the nearest integer

figures/ijc2012-2012026-004.jpg

*Pearson χ2(2)/Bonferroni adjusted p-values; significant difference at p<0.05 in bold.

Table 2

Perceived benefits from the FCs by individual shareholders. The figures represent the proportion (%) of affirmative response to specific benefits by the respondents (local shareholders). The table only includes perceived benefits with 20% or higher total response. The percentage figures are rounded to the nearest integer

figures/ijc2012-2012026-005.jpg

*Pearson χ2(2)/Bonferroni adjusted p-values; significant difference at p<0.05 in bold.

Table 3

The perceived contribution of the FC to local community by the shareholders. The figures represent the proportion (%) of affirmative response to specific benefits by the respondents (local shareholders). The table only includes perceived benefits with 20% or higher total response. The percentage figures are rounded to the nearest integer

figures/ijc2012-2012026-006.jpg

*Pearson χ2(2)/Bonferroni adjusted p-values; significant difference at p<0.05 in bold.

Table 4

Local shareholders’ opinions about their FC in Älvdalen, Jokkmokk and Tärna-Stensele (TSA). Responses to the statements are: A=Totally agree; B=Partly agree; C=Do not agree; and D=Have no opinion. Figures across each response indicate the proportion (%) of respondents choosing that response, rounded to the nearest integer. ‘Cases’ shows the total number of respondents (N)

figures/ijc2012-2012026-007.jpg

*Pearson χ2(2)/Bonferroni adjusted p-values; significant difference at p<0.05 in bold.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.323 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Feb 28, 2013
Published by: Igitur Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2013 Gun Lidestav, Mahesh Poudyal, Eva Holmgren, Carina Keskitalo, published by Igitur Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.