Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Crop improvement in the CGIAR as a global success story of open access and international collaboration Cover

Crop improvement in the CGIAR as a global success story of open access and international collaboration

By: Derek Byerlee and  H.J. Dubin  
Open Access
|Dec 2009

Figures & Tables

figures/ijc2009-200933-001.jpg
Figure 1

The Four-Year Cycle of the International Nurseries.

figures/ijc2009-200933-002.jpg
Figure 2

Annual Number of Wheat Nurseries Shipped, 1973–2007.

figures/ijc2009-200933-003.jpg
Figure 3

Annual Number of Wheat Trainees and Countries of Origin, 1967–2008.

figures/ijc2009-200933-004.jpg
Figure 4

Average Number of Landrace Ancestors for Spring Bread Wheat Varieties in Developing Countries, 1965–1997 (Source: Smale et al. 2002).

figures/ijc2009-200933-005.jpg
Figure 5

Trends in Real Budget of CIMMYT’s Wheat Program, 1980–2002.

figures/ijc2009-200933-006.jpg
Figure 6

Number of patents issued annually on varieties and research tools and processes for major crops in the USA. Source: Heisey, P. W. (personal communication).

figures/ijc2009-200933-007.jpg
Figure 7

Real Public and Private Sector Expenditures on Plant Breeding, USA.

figures/ijc2009-200933-008.jpg
Figure 8

Impacts of ‘New Rules’ of the Game on Germplasm Flows.

Table 1

Evolution of international spring wheat nurseries, 1950s–2000s.

DecadeMain focusMain nurseries added
1950s (USDA)RustsInternational Stem Rust Trial for North and South America
1960s Pre-CIMMYT and early CIMMYTProvide best available wheat germplasm to cooperating programs with broad adaptation, high yield potential, and multiple disease resistance and test these qualities over time and spaceFirst International Spring Wheat Yield Trial; Int Durum Yield Trial; Int Bread Wheat Screening Nursery; Int Triticale Yield Trial; Int Triticale Screening Nursery
1970s CIMMYT eraProvide high yielding, broadly adapted, daylength insensitive, multiple disease resistant germplasm. Start of spring by winter wheat breeding program. Specialty nurseries particularly for disease resistanceCrossing blocks; F2’s irrigated and dryland; International Septoria Screening Nursery; Elite Spring Wheat Yield Trial; Regional Disease Trap Nursery
1980sAs before but with additional adaptation for diverse environments, designated as mega-environments. Large program on wheat for non-traditional, warmer climatesSemi-Arid Wheat Screening Nursery; Acid Soils Wheat Screening Nursery; High Rainfall Wheat Screening Nursery; International Disease Trap Nursery; Karnal Bunt Screening Nursery
1990sAs before with additional stratification of environments including higher latitudes with daylength sensitive wheat for eastern Europe and central AsiaHigh Rainfall Wheat Yield Trial; High Temp Wheat Yield Trial; Semi-Arid Wheat Yield Trial; Warmer Area Wheat Screening Nursery. High Latitude Wheat Screening Nursery
2000sAdditional specialty nurseries for diseases and other traitsScab Resistance Screening Nursery International; South Asia Micronutrient Yield Trial; International Adaptation Trial; Global Adaptation Wheat Yield Trial. Other special ones such as Stem Rust Screening Nursery
Table 2

Number of visiting scientists to CIMMYT by region, 1966–2000 (Source: Villareal, 2001).

OriginNumber
Sub-Saharan Africa133
West and North Africa177
East, South and Southeast Asia451
Latin America499
Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Caucasus60
High-income countries546
Total1866
Table 3

Origin of Spring Bread Wheat Varieties Released in Developing Countries, 1966–1997 (Source: Heisey et al. 2003).

CIMMYT crossCIMMYT parentCIMMYT ancestorOther origin
1966–197037.720.4635.9100
1971–197548.223.96.221.7100
1976–198040.938.56.114.5100
1981–198545.832.09.113.1100
1986–199052.328.610.19.0100
1991–199752.729.28.39.8100
Table 4

Percent origin of land race ancestors of bread wheat varieties grown in the developing world in 1990. (Based on Smale and McBride 1996.)

Origin of base land races (%)SS AfricaN. AfricaW. AsiaSouth AsiaMexico and CASouthern Cone
SS Africa12979107
N. Africa242321
W. Asia217211
S. Asia10872166
Mexico and CA437695
Southern Cone14168111732
Transitional152116182114
High-income272733201727
Other-unknown1411131057
Total100100100100100100
Table 5

Trends in yield potential of spring bread wheats by environment, 1979–1999. (Source: Lantican et al. 2001).

IrrigatedHigh rainfallDryHot
Growth rate (%/year)0.821.16 3.48 2.10
Growth (kg/year)53.562.587.746.1
Table 6

Summary of estimates of economic benefits to international wheat breeding research.

StudyPeriod coveredAll breedingAttributed to CIMMYT-national network
Byerlee and Traxler (1996)1966–1990$3.0 billion per year
Internal rate of return of 53%
$1.5 billion per year
Heisey et al. (2002) mid-range estimate1996–1997$2.4 billion per year$1.1 billion per year
Lantican et al. (2005) – mid-range estimate1988–2002$3.4–4.8 billion per year$1.0–1.8 billion per year
Marasas et al. (2004) – leaf rust resistance only1973–2007$5.4 billion net present value
Evenson and Rosegrant (2002)1965–2000With no breeding research:
• 9–14% reduction in output
• 29–61% increase in price
With no CGIAR
• 5–6% reduction in output
• 19–22% increase in price
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.147 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Dec 2, 2009
Published by: Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services for IASC
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2009 Derek Byerlee, H.J. Dubin, published by Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services for IASC
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.