Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Institutional innovation in less than ideal conditions: Management of commons by an Alaska Native village corporation Cover

Institutional innovation in less than ideal conditions: Management of commons by an Alaska Native village corporation

By: Dixie Dayo and  Gary Kofinas  
Open Access
|Sep 2009

Figures & Tables

figures/ijc2009-200921-001.jpg
Figure 1

The Twelve ANCSA Regional Corporation boundaries and the community of Manley Hot Springs, Alaska.

figures/ijc2009-200921-002.jpg
Figure 2

Bean Ridge Corporation Office located in Manley Hot Springs, Alaska. (Photo Credit G. Pullar)

Table 1

ANCSA formula determining the number of shareholders and number of acres available to convey to local corporations.

Number of corporation shareholdersNumber of acres entitled to be selected
25–9969,120
100–19992,160
200–399115,200
400–599138,240
600 or more161,280
Table 2

Examples of 2008 7(i) Alaska Regional Corporation contributions to the Doyon region. 70% of revenues from timber and subsurface estate is shared among all 12 regional corporations. ANCSA section 7 (j) distributes 50% of these revenues to village corporations and at-large shareholders. Bean Ridge Corporation received $49,182 or $1171 per shareholder in May 2008.

Alaska Native CorporationContributions
Sealaska$410,442
ASRC$7,625,200
CIRI$248,993
NANA$2,191,261
Calista$110,638
Interest$28,208
Total$10,614,742
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.146 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Sep 25, 2009
Published by: Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services for IASC
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2009 Dixie Dayo, Gary Kofinas, published by Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services for IASC
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.